All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Yusuke Goda <yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Cao Minh Hiep <hiepcm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: mmc->f_max should be half of the bus clock
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:43:51 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120327014343.GA28782@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoSrg5Niezq5tLA+a3j9PUoTGoBUBtEBazjEKbCFXHhX1g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:17:21PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:45:30PM +0900, Yusuke Goda wrote:
> >> Hi Simon-san, Guennadi-san
> >>
> >> (2012/03/26 7:30), Simon Horman wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 07:06:31PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> mmc->f_max should be half of the bus clock.
> >> >>> And now that mmc->f_max is not equal to the bus clock the
> >> >>> latter should be used directly to calculate mmc->f_min.
> >> >>
> >> >> The patch seems correct as it stands, however, looking at it - does anyone
> >> >> understands why that "close to 400kHz" comment and such a complicated
> >> >> calculation? Shouldn't it be just host->clk / 512 always? Maybe this
> >> >> should be a separate patch, so, for this one
> >> >>
> >> >> Acked-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> >> >
> >> > Hi Guennadi,
> >> >
> >> > that code seems to date back to the original driver submission
> >> > made by Goda-san. I have CCed him as perhaps he recalls why
> >> > the code is like it is.
> >> I thought to get closer to 400kHz if possible.
> >> Probably even host->clk / 512 does not have any problem.
> >
> > Sorry for my ignorance, is ~400kHz desirable for some reason?
> 
> The 400kHz frequency is used during initialization of the SD card.
> Simply put, the SD frequency starts low out low and is then changed to
> something higher depending on the capability of the memory card and
> the host controller. Please have a look at the simplified SD
> specification for more details.

Thanks, got it.

Do you have a feeling of if it it worth trying to start with a value close
to 400kHz or if it would be better to simplify the code? I can try and
measure the difference in start up time for particular hardware
combinations, but I'm not sure how far that will get us.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-27  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-21  9:02 [PATCH 0/2] MMCIF Clock Fixes Simon Horman
2012-03-21  9:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: double clock speed Simon Horman
2012-03-24 17:56   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-26  2:21     ` Simon Horman
2012-03-21  9:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: mmc->f_max should be half of the bus clock Simon Horman
2012-03-24 18:06   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
     [not found]     ` <20120325223033.GA6860@verge.net.au>
2012-03-26  5:45       ` Yusuke Goda
2012-03-26  5:52         ` Simon Horman
2012-03-26  6:04           ` Yusuke Goda
2012-03-26  6:17           ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-26  7:04             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-27  7:53               ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-27  8:14                 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-27  1:43             ` Simon Horman [this message]
2012-03-27  2:46               ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-27  3:20                 ` Chris Ball
2012-03-27  4:02                   ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-27  6:01                     ` Simon Horman
2012-03-27  6:37                       ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-27  7:12                         ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120327014343.GA28782@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=hiepcm@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.