From: Yusuke Goda <yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Cao Minh Hiep <hiepcm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: mmc->f_max should be half of the bus clock
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:45:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F70027A.9020203@renesas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120325223033.GA6860@verge.net.au>
Hi Simon-san, Guennadi-san
(2012/03/26 7:30), Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 07:06:31PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Simon Horman wrote:
>>
>>> mmc->f_max should be half of the bus clock.
>>> And now that mmc->f_max is not equal to the bus clock the
>>> latter should be used directly to calculate mmc->f_min.
>>
>> The patch seems correct as it stands, however, looking at it - does anyone
>> understands why that "close to 400kHz" comment and such a complicated
>> calculation? Shouldn't it be just host->clk / 512 always? Maybe this
>> should be a separate patch, so, for this one
>>
>> Acked-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
>
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> that code seems to date back to the original driver submission
> made by Goda-san. I have CCed him as perhaps he recalls why
> the code is like it is.
I thought to get closer to 400kHz if possible.
Probably even host->clk / 512 does not have any problem.
cheers,
Goda
>>> Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
>>> Tested-by: Cao Minh Hiep <hiepcm@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c | 12 ++++++------
>>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c
>>> index 5014bc4..1410baa 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c
>>> @@ -1297,14 +1297,14 @@ static int __devinit sh_mmcif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> spin_lock_init(&host->lock);
>>>
>>> mmc->ops = &sh_mmcif_ops;
>>> - mmc->f_max = host->clk;
>>> + mmc->f_max = host->clk / 2;
>>> /* close to 400KHz */
>>> - if (mmc->f_max < 51200000)
>>> - mmc->f_min = mmc->f_max / 128;
>>> - else if (mmc->f_max < 102400000)
>>> - mmc->f_min = mmc->f_max / 256;
>>> + if (host->clk < 51200000)
>>> + mmc->f_min = host->clk / 128;
>>> + else if (host->clk < 102400000)
>>> + mmc->f_min = host->clk / 256;
>>> else
>>> - mmc->f_min = mmc->f_max / 512;
>>> + mmc->f_min = host->clk / 512;
>>> if (pd->ocr)
>>> mmc->ocr_avail = pd->ocr;
>>> mmc->caps = MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
>>> --
>>> 1.7.6.3
>>>
>>
>> ---
>> Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
>> Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
>> http://www.open-technology.de/
>>
>
>
--
EC No.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-26 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-21 9:02 [PATCH 0/2] MMCIF Clock Fixes Simon Horman
2012-03-21 9:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: double clock speed Simon Horman
2012-03-24 17:56 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-26 2:21 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-21 9:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sh_mmcif: mmc->f_max should be half of the bus clock Simon Horman
2012-03-24 18:06 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
[not found] ` <20120325223033.GA6860@verge.net.au>
2012-03-26 5:45 ` Yusuke Goda [this message]
2012-03-26 5:52 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-26 6:04 ` Yusuke Goda
2012-03-26 6:17 ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-26 7:04 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-27 7:53 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-27 8:14 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-27 1:43 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-27 2:46 ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-27 3:20 ` Chris Ball
2012-03-27 4:02 ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-27 6:01 ` Simon Horman
2012-03-27 6:37 ` Magnus Damm
2012-03-27 7:12 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F70027A.9020203@renesas.com \
--to=yusuke.goda.sx@renesas.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=hiepcm@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.