From: "Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>
To: joancarles <joancarles@fqingenieria.es>
Cc: Zhu Richard-R65037 <r65037@freescale.com>,
shawn.guo@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [MX25][MMC] mmc esdhc failure in 3.3
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:58:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120327105819.00d89783@eb-e6520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac05d6e5c1ce4bf9cfc5c28d235f866f@mail.fqingenieria.es>
Hi Joan Carles,
Le Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:46:45 +0200,
joancarles <joancarles@fqingenieria.es> a écrit :
> >> This is still present, and we have absolutely no idea where to
> >> continue
> >> searching for the solution of the problem. Any pointers? Any git
> >> trees
> >> of mmc driver changes we could try? Anybody else with a MX25 that
> >> has
> >> this issue?
> >>
> > does that attached patch fix your problem ?
>
> YES, indeed it does to a certain degree. The timeout errors do not
> occur anymore and I can successfully perform many fs->ops, such as READ,
> WRITE, UNLINK ... . So thank you very much for this insight through your
> patch!
>
> The speed of the card is excruciatingly slow, however. We roughly get
> between 34KB/s and 64KB/s from a dd if=/dev/zero write to any of the
> following partitions:
>
I have the same speed problem here on i.MX25 but still haven't found
the reason.
Shawn, Richard : do you have an idea of why the eSDHC is so slow on
i.MX25 ?
Thanks,
Eric
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: eric@eukrea.com (Eric Bénard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [MX25][MMC] mmc esdhc failure in 3.3
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:58:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120327105819.00d89783@eb-e6520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac05d6e5c1ce4bf9cfc5c28d235f866f@mail.fqingenieria.es>
Hi Joan Carles,
Le Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:46:45 +0200,
joancarles <joancarles@fqingenieria.es> a ?crit :
> >> This is still present, and we have absolutely no idea where to
> >> continue
> >> searching for the solution of the problem. Any pointers? Any git
> >> trees
> >> of mmc driver changes we could try? Anybody else with a MX25 that
> >> has
> >> this issue?
> >>
> > does that attached patch fix your problem ?
>
> YES, indeed it does to a certain degree. The timeout errors do not
> occur anymore and I can successfully perform many fs->ops, such as READ,
> WRITE, UNLINK ... . So thank you very much for this insight through your
> patch!
>
> The speed of the card is excruciatingly slow, however. We roughly get
> between 34KB/s and 64KB/s from a dd if=/dev/zero write to any of the
> following partitions:
>
I have the same speed problem here on i.MX25 but still haven't found
the reason.
Shawn, Richard : do you have an idea of why the eSDHC is so slow on
i.MX25 ?
Thanks,
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-27 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-06 11:29 [MX25][MMC] mmc esdhc failure in 3.3-rc5 joancarles
2012-03-12 13:12 ` [MX25][MMC] mmc esdhc failure in 3.3-rc5 (still present in rc7) joancarles
2012-03-12 13:12 ` joancarles
2012-03-12 13:24 ` [MX25][MMC] mmc esdhc failure in 3.3-rc5 Wolfram Sang
2012-03-12 14:50 ` joancarles
2012-03-12 21:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-03-13 11:20 ` joancarles
2012-03-13 5:55 ` Zhu Richard-R65037
2012-03-16 15:03 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 7:32 ` [MX25][MMC] mmc esdhc failure in 3.3 joancarles
2012-03-27 7:32 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 7:59 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 7:59 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 8:12 ` Eric Bénard
2012-03-27 8:12 ` Eric Bénard
2012-03-27 8:46 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 8:46 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 8:58 ` Eric Bénard [this message]
2012-03-27 8:58 ` Eric Bénard
2012-03-27 13:03 ` Zhu Richard-R65037
2012-03-27 13:03 ` Zhu Richard-R65037
2012-03-27 9:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-03-27 9:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-03-27 9:06 ` Eric Bénard
2012-03-27 9:06 ` Eric Bénard
2012-03-27 9:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-03-27 9:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-03-27 9:23 ` Eric Bénard
2012-03-27 9:23 ` Eric Bénard
2012-03-27 9:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-03-27 9:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-03-27 9:33 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 9:33 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 9:40 ` Eric Bénard
2012-03-27 9:40 ` Eric Bénard
2012-03-27 10:56 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 10:56 ` joancarles
2012-03-28 9:26 ` joancarles
2012-03-28 9:26 ` joancarles
2012-03-28 14:01 ` joancarles
2012-03-28 14:01 ` joancarles
2012-03-27 9:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-03-27 9:45 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120327105819.00d89783@eb-e6520 \
--to=eric@eukrea.com \
--cc=joancarles@fqingenieria.es \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r65037@freescale.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.