All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20120330200447.GL755@shiny>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index fc77b56..c573b7f 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,14 +4,12 @@ On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:54:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
 > >
 > > This causes a new warning for me:
 > >
-> > =C2=A0fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function =E2=80=98repair_eb_io_failu=
-re=E2=80=99:
-> > =C2=A0fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1940:6: warning: =E2=80=98ret=E2=80=99 m=
-ay be used
+> >  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function ‘repair_eb_io_failure’:
+> >  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1940:6: warning: ‘ret’ may be used
 > > uninitialized in this function
 > >
 > > Hmm?
->=20
+> 
 > Ok, so presumably num_pages (which is "num_extent_pages(eb->start,
 > eb->len)") cannot be zero, so I guess the code is ok. But gcc can't
 > know that, and it's an annoying warning.
@@ -19,9 +17,8 @@ ay be used
 Whoops, my reply was too slow, sorry.  If you're curious my gcc that
 doesn't warn in 4.6.3.
 
->=20
-> So please fix, but it's not urgent. In the meantime I've pulled and p=
-ushed out.
+> 
+> So please fix, but it's not urgent. In the meantime I've pulled and pushed out.
 
 Ok, I'll send just the incremental in a later pull.
 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 3bcd4b0..0d0d3a0 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -15,14 +15,12 @@
  "> >\n"
  "> > This causes a new warning for me:\n"
  "> >\n"
- "> > =C2=A0fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function =E2=80=98repair_eb_io_failu=\n"
- "re=E2=80=99:\n"
- "> > =C2=A0fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1940:6: warning: =E2=80=98ret=E2=80=99 m=\n"
- "ay be used\n"
+ "> > \302\240fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function \342\200\230repair_eb_io_failure\342\200\231:\n"
+ "> > \302\240fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1940:6: warning: \342\200\230ret\342\200\231 may be used\n"
  "> > uninitialized in this function\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > Hmm?\n"
- ">=20\n"
+ "> \n"
  "> Ok, so presumably num_pages (which is \"num_extent_pages(eb->start,\n"
  "> eb->len)\") cannot be zero, so I guess the code is ok. But gcc can't\n"
  "> know that, and it's an annoying warning.\n"
@@ -30,12 +28,11 @@
  "Whoops, my reply was too slow, sorry.  If you're curious my gcc that\n"
  "doesn't warn in 4.6.3.\n"
  "\n"
- ">=20\n"
- "> So please fix, but it's not urgent. In the meantime I've pulled and p=\n"
- "ushed out.\n"
+ "> \n"
+ "> So please fix, but it's not urgent. In the meantime I've pulled and pushed out.\n"
  "\n"
  "Ok, I'll send just the incremental in a later pull.\n"
  "\n"
  -chris
 
-22cb4f9c0d4a3267203db3ce60ce900cca70066f31cad0e7696af091277f8c41
+2f3b15386ca3ccd6a71447379c5eaedf286d0555356bf55de849759c29b815e2

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.