From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Rodrigo Silva <rodrigosilva@rodrigosilva.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Rodrigo Silva (MestreLion)" <linux@rodrigosilva.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Ben Walton <bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] var doc: default editor and pager are configurable at build time
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 05:51:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120331105106.GA12552@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f76de0e.2ac7b60a.54ce.ffffd85eSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com>
Hi Rodrigo,
Rodrigo Silva wrote:
>> Unfortunately those compile-time settings do not affect the
>> documentation, so the uninitiated user who tries to understand git by
>> reading the git-var(1) manpage can easily be confused when git falls
>> back to 'nano' and 'more' instead of 'vi' and 'less'. Even if the
>> distributor patches the distributed docs to reflect the new default,
>> the user may read the official documentation from the git-htmldocs
>> repository online and be confused in the same way.
>
> I'm sorry, but I disagree with this approach. There is no "usually":
> upstream sources are *always* 'vi', and Debian packages are *always*
> 'editor'.
I disagree. If I build the pristine source from Junio with
"./configure --with-shell=my-favorite-shell", I still have built the
pristine source from Junio.
[...]
> Upstream git /could/ say "... and finally, a hardcoded editor chosen
> at compile time, by default 'vi'"
It is not hardcoded.
[...]
> IMHO, only saying that "it can be customized", "it is usually 'vi'",
> without saying it /was/ customized and it /isn't/ vi, but editor, is
> not a good approach.
Ah, perhaps that is the source of misunderstanding. This is a
two-patch series. The two patches are meant to go together. Does
that help?
Sorry for the lack of clarity,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-31 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120330002543.2138.91961.reportbug@localhost6.localdomain6>
2012-03-30 0:55 ` [PATCH] Documentation: replace 'vi' for 'editor' to reflect build-time option Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-30 2:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-30 10:33 ` Bug#666250: " Rodrigo Silva
[not found] ` <20120330103326.272B040A067@cobalt.pobox.com>
2012-03-30 16:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-31 8:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-31 8:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] var doc: default editor and pager are configurable at build time Jonathan Nieder
[not found] ` <4f76de0e.2ac7b60a.54ce.ffffd85eSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com>
2012-03-31 10:51 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2012-03-31 8:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] var doc: advertise current DEFAULT_PAGER and DEFAULT_EDITOR settings Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-31 17:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-18 20:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-31 20:29 ` [PATCH] Documentation: replace 'vi' for 'editor' to reflect build-time option Phil Hord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120331105106.GA12552@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=linux@rodrigosilva.com \
--cc=rodrigosilva@rodrigosilva.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.