From: "Gerhard Pircher" <gerhard_pircher@gmx.net>
To: "\"Michel Dänzer\"" <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, ojordan12345@hotmail.co.uk,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: PowerPC radeon KMS - is it possible?
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:48:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120419114825.203090@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334817171.5989.366.camel@thor.local>
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:32:51 +0200
> Von: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
> An: Gerhard Pircher <gerhard_pircher@gmx.net>
> CC: ojordan12345@hotmail.co.uk, schwab@linux-m68k.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Betreff: Re: PowerPC radeon KMS - is it possible?
> On Mit, 2012-04-18 at 18:23 +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> > > Von: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
> > > On Mit, 2012-04-18 at 17:49 +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> > > > > Von: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
> > > > > On Mit, 2012-04-18 at 16:55 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > > > > Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> writes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mit, 2012-04-18 at 16:28 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > > > > >> Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> writes:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Have you tried smaller aperture sizes
> (uninorth_agp.aperture)
> > > > > > >> > and/or radeon.test=1? (See commit
> > > > > > >> > 52f072cb084bbb460d3a4ae09f0b6efc3e7e8a8c)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Neither changes anything.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How small aperture sizes have you tried?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 32M. With the old UMS driver 3D once worked fine ...
> > > > >
> > > > > That doesn't necessarily mean much per se, as with UMS memory is
> > > > > only statically mapped into the AGP GART once (so most of those
> > > > > 32M are wasted at least most of the time), whereas with KMS it's
> > > > > dynamically (un)mapped on demand.
> > > > That may be a stupid question, but is it allowed (for a DRM client
> > > > or whatever does the mapping) to change the content of a page
> > > > mapped into the AGP GART or is it necessary to explicitly unmap
> > > > the page, change its content and map it again?
> > >
> > > The former.
> > I know that the uninorth AGPGART driver does a cache flushing for
> > newly mapped pages,
>
> Ah, right, that probably explains why the map_page_into_agp change
> doesn't make any difference.
>
>
> > but is there any code in the driver that handles the former case (or
> > isn't this necessary on PPC Macs)?
>
> If by 'former case' you mean userspace modifying memory mapped into the
> AGP GART, then no, this generally doesn't require special treatment on
> PowerMacs. (Ignoring the potential issue mentioned by Ben in this
> thread)
I guess you refer to the ordering issue here.
The "former case" is an explanation, why I see data corruption with my
AGPGART driver (more or less a copy of the uninorth driver) on my
non-coherent platform. There are no cache flushes done for writes to
already mapped pages.
I tested this with radeon.test=1, but I'm not even sure if this code
changes already mapped pages (all of this makes it hard to tell for
me whether I stumble over a severe hardware error and/or a "simple"
coherency problem).
> > > > I would say it's necessary to unmap the page first (sounds more
> > > > like the pci_[un]map_page() approach) - at least when it should
> > > > work with non-coherent architectures, too.
> > >
> > > I'm afraid non-coherent platforms haven't really been a concern yet
> > > for KMS, and always doing the above dance would probably have a
> > > significant performance impact on coherent platforms.
> > Are there any plans for a page flushing API? I suppose that wouldn't
> > have such a big performance impact on coherent platforms (but probably
> > an impact on the userspace API).
>
> Not that I know of.
>
> Note that this isn't necessarily the only possible approach for
> addressing this problem. The driver knows which memory buffers are used
> by a GPU command stream sequence, so it should be able to take any
> measures necessary to ensure the device sees their contents as of when
> the command stream was submitted.
Good to hear! Anyway the TTM backend and the KMS drivers are a way
too complex for me so that I can only hope there will be a solution
for non-coherent platforms someday. :-)
Thanks for the clarification!
Gerhard
--
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-19 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 19:49 PowerPC radeon KMS - is it possible? o jordan
2012-04-18 6:35 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 6:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <1334732346.1159.5.camel__22339.9641145535$1334732429$gmane$org@pasglop>
2012-04-18 7:46 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 10:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-04-18 10:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-04-18 10:54 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 11:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-04-18 13:07 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 22:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <1334730915.5989.265.camel__41553.0639271767$1334731329$gmane$org@thor.local>
2012-04-18 7:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 7:52 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 11:25 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 13:02 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 13:22 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 13:25 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 13:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 7:54 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 8:02 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 10:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-04-18 10:34 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 10:44 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 11:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-04-18 13:08 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 12:49 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 11:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-04-18 13:27 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 11:30 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 13:38 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 14:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 14:31 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 14:55 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-04-18 15:01 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 15:49 ` Gerhard Pircher
2012-04-18 16:06 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 16:23 ` Gerhard Pircher
2012-04-19 6:32 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-19 11:48 ` Gerhard Pircher [this message]
2012-04-19 12:41 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-18 15:39 ` Andreas Schwab
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-20 11:15 Gerhard Pircher
2012-04-20 13:18 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-20 16:14 ` Gerhard Pircher
2012-04-23 9:56 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-23 16:45 ` Gerhard Pircher
2012-04-24 14:15 ` Michel Dänzer
2012-04-24 17:10 ` Gerhard Pircher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120419114825.203090@gmx.net \
--to=gerhard_pircher@gmx.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michel@daenzer.net \
--cc=ojordan12345@hotmail.co.uk \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.