From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Grant Likely
<grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
vitalywool-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
kevin.wells-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org,
srinivas.bakki-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: Add device tree support to i2c-pnx.c
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:28:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420072811.GA9769@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F90812F.5090106-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]
> Another solution would be to not use timeout with the dt enabled
> i2c-pnx for now (using the hard coded default timeout as the current
> i2c-pnx.c does) and possibly introduce the (anyway optional) "timeout"
> later.
Yeah, let's do it like this.
> Interesting! When the documentation is outdated - how does the parser
> actually decide between hex (e.g. regs/addresses) and dec (e.g.
> clock-frequency) in the absence of "0x"?
Are there regs without 0x?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] i2c: Add device tree support to i2c-pnx.c
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:28:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420072811.GA9769@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F90812F.5090106@antcom.de>
> Another solution would be to not use timeout with the dt enabled
> i2c-pnx for now (using the hard coded default timeout as the current
> i2c-pnx.c does) and possibly introduce the (anyway optional) "timeout"
> later.
Yeah, let's do it like this.
> Interesting! When the documentation is outdated - how does the parser
> actually decide between hex (e.g. regs/addresses) and dec (e.g.
> clock-frequency) in the absence of "0x"?
Are there regs without 0x?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120420/40b6643a/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
vitalywool@gmail.com, khali@linux-fr.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, arm@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com,
srinivas.bakki@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: Add device tree support to i2c-pnx.c
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:28:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420072811.GA9769@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F90812F.5090106@antcom.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]
> Another solution would be to not use timeout with the dt enabled
> i2c-pnx for now (using the hard coded default timeout as the current
> i2c-pnx.c does) and possibly introduce the (anyway optional) "timeout"
> later.
Yeah, let's do it like this.
> Interesting! When the documentation is outdated - how does the parser
> actually decide between hex (e.g. regs/addresses) and dec (e.g.
> clock-frequency) in the absence of "0x"?
Are there regs without 0x?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-19 15:50 [PATCH v4] i2c: Add device tree support to i2c-pnx.c Roland Stigge
2012-04-19 15:50 ` Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <1334850612-24151-1-git-send-email-stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-19 16:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-19 16:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-19 16:07 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120419160715.GD24987-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-19 16:32 ` Roland Stigge
2012-04-19 16:32 ` Roland Stigge
2012-04-19 16:32 ` Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <4F903E0C.6010604-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-19 20:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-19 20:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-19 20:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-19 21:18 ` Roland Stigge
2012-04-19 21:18 ` Roland Stigge
2012-04-19 21:18 ` Roland Stigge
[not found] ` <4F90812F.5090106-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-20 7:28 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-04-20 7:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-20 7:28 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120420072811.GA9769-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-20 7:53 ` Roland Stigge
2012-04-20 7:53 ` Roland Stigge
2012-04-20 7:53 ` Roland Stigge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120420072811.GA9769@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kevin.wells-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=srinivas.bakki-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stigge-uj/7R2tJ6VmzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vitalywool-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.