From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: fist cleanup branch for 3.5
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:32:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204222032.48694.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8D9037.9010401@atmel.com>
On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Arnd, Olof,
>
> The following changes since commit e816b57a337ea3b755de72bec38c10c864f23015:
>
> Linux 3.4-rc3 (2012-04-15 18:28:29 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-3.5-cleanup
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 39ecc143b4c1f3d42e8300e7f5274681b99f95c2:
>
> ARM: at91: add defconfig for device tree (2012-04-17 14:47:22 +0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> First batch of AT91 cleanup for 3.5 kernel.
> - The biggest improvement of this series is the ability to compile several
> AT91 SoCs in one kernel image.
> For now on it's limited to the DT-enabled boards but we can compile all
> the core together.
> - The Kconfig series is stacked before other patches as it is simple and
> non-intrusive. Its goal is to remove too restrictive dependencies on
> SoC names. This will allow to add support for newer SoC seamlessly.
> - Some very "cosmetic" Kconfig changes are also added (entry names,
> comments, etc.).
Pulled into the next/cleanup branch, and also pulled the MAINTAINERS
update into the next/maintainers branch.
Olof, this is the first pull from a tag I've done, and I think we
should decide on a method to show these pulls in the log. I've
set the at91/cleanup branch to the version that Nicolas sent,
without the merge changeset that is normally generated when you
pull from a tag. For next/cleanup branch, I've pulled directly from
the tag and edited the commit message a bit. Do you think that's good
or do you know a better way to handle these?
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fist cleanup branch for 3.5
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:32:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204222032.48694.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8D9037.9010401@atmel.com>
On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Arnd, Olof,
>
> The following changes since commit e816b57a337ea3b755de72bec38c10c864f23015:
>
> Linux 3.4-rc3 (2012-04-15 18:28:29 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-3.5-cleanup
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 39ecc143b4c1f3d42e8300e7f5274681b99f95c2:
>
> ARM: at91: add defconfig for device tree (2012-04-17 14:47:22 +0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> First batch of AT91 cleanup for 3.5 kernel.
> - The biggest improvement of this series is the ability to compile several
> AT91 SoCs in one kernel image.
> For now on it's limited to the DT-enabled boards but we can compile all
> the core together.
> - The Kconfig series is stacked before other patches as it is simple and
> non-intrusive. Its goal is to remove too restrictive dependencies on
> SoC names. This will allow to add support for newer SoC seamlessly.
> - Some very "cosmetic" Kconfig changes are also added (entry names,
> comments, etc.).
Pulled into the next/cleanup branch, and also pulled the MAINTAINERS
update into the next/maintainers branch.
Olof, this is the first pull from a tag I've done, and I think we
should decide on a method to show these pulls in the log. I've
set the at91/cleanup branch to the version that Nicolas sent,
without the merge changeset that is normally generated when you
pull from a tag. For next/cleanup branch, I've pulled directly from
the tag and edited the commit message a bit. Do you think that's good
or do you know a better way to handle these?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-22 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 15:45 [GIT PULL] at91: fist cleanup branch for 3.5 Nicolas Ferre
2012-04-17 15:45 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-04-17 16:02 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-04-17 16:02 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-04-22 20:32 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-04-22 20:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-22 22:03 ` Olof Johansson
2012-04-22 22:03 ` Olof Johansson
2012-04-23 11:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-23 11:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201204222032.48694.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.