From: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
To: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] video: msm: Fix section mismatches in mddi.c
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:19:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120423161941.GA26903@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F94F3D7.5030904@gmx.de>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 06:16:55AM +0000, Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 06:45 PM, David Brown wrote:
> > The change
> > commit 461cbe77d0a4f887c33a3a95ea68a7daf23b4302
> > Author: Gregory Bean <gbean@codeaurora.org>
> > Date: Wed Jul 28 10:22:13 2010 -0700
> >
> > video: msm: Fix section mismatch in mddi.c.
> >
> > fixes a section mismatch between the board file and the driver's probe
> > function, however, it misses the additional mismatches between the
> > probe function and some routines it calls. Fix these up as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
>
> Applied.
Hmm. I guess it is somewhat my fault, since I sent the message To
both myself and you. I've already applied this to the MSM tree, and I
believe it has been merged into Linus' tree. I don't think it'll be
an issue, since git merge will handle the duplicate patch fine.
Next time, I'll try to be clearer about which tree I'm thinking for a
patch to go through.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] video: msm: Fix section mismatches in mddi.c
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:19:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120423161941.GA26903@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F94F3D7.5030904@gmx.de>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 06:16:55AM +0000, Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 06:45 PM, David Brown wrote:
> > The change
> > commit 461cbe77d0a4f887c33a3a95ea68a7daf23b4302
> > Author: Gregory Bean <gbean@codeaurora.org>
> > Date: Wed Jul 28 10:22:13 2010 -0700
> >
> > video: msm: Fix section mismatch in mddi.c.
> >
> > fixes a section mismatch between the board file and the driver's probe
> > function, however, it misses the additional mismatches between the
> > probe function and some routines it calls. Fix these up as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
>
> Applied.
Hmm. I guess it is somewhat my fault, since I sent the message To
both myself and you. I've already applied this to the MSM tree, and I
believe it has been merged into Linus' tree. I don't think it'll be
an issue, since git merge will handle the duplicate patch fine.
Next time, I'll try to be clearer about which tree I'm thinking for a
patch to go through.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] video: msm: Fix section mismatches in mddi.c
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:19:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120423161941.GA26903@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F94F3D7.5030904@gmx.de>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 06:16:55AM +0000, Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 06:45 PM, David Brown wrote:
> > The change
> > commit 461cbe77d0a4f887c33a3a95ea68a7daf23b4302
> > Author: Gregory Bean <gbean@codeaurora.org>
> > Date: Wed Jul 28 10:22:13 2010 -0700
> >
> > video: msm: Fix section mismatch in mddi.c.
> >
> > fixes a section mismatch between the board file and the driver's probe
> > function, however, it misses the additional mismatches between the
> > probe function and some routines it calls. Fix these up as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
>
> Applied.
Hmm. I guess it is somewhat my fault, since I sent the message To
both myself and you. I've already applied this to the MSM tree, and I
believe it has been merged into Linus' tree. I don't think it'll be
an issue, since git merge will handle the duplicate patch fine.
Next time, I'll try to be clearer about which tree I'm thinking for a
patch to go through.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-23 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-12 18:45 [PATCH 1/2] video: msm: Fix section mismatches in mddi.c David Brown
2012-04-12 18:45 ` David Brown
2012-04-12 18:45 ` David Brown
2012-04-12 18:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: msm: Fix section mismatches in proc_comm.c David Brown
2012-04-12 18:45 ` David Brown
2012-04-23 6:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] video: msm: Fix section mismatches in mddi.c Florian Tobias Schandinat
2012-04-23 6:16 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2012-04-23 6:16 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2012-04-23 16:19 ` David Brown [this message]
2012-04-23 16:19 ` David Brown
2012-04-23 16:19 ` David Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120423161941.GA26903@codeaurora.org \
--to=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.