From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/1] Flexible proportions
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:10:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120425021011.GA5600@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335285033-7347-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Hi Jan,
> So my plan, if people are happy with the new proportion code, would be to
> switch at least bdi writeout proportion to the new code. I can also check
> other users to see whether it would make sense for them to switch. So what
> do people think?
When you get ready with the full patchset, I would be very interested
in watching how it performs in the various JBOD tests :-)
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/1] Flexible proportions
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:10:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120425021011.GA5600@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335285033-7347-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Hi Jan,
> So my plan, if people are happy with the new proportion code, would be to
> switch at least bdi writeout proportion to the new code. I can also check
> other users to see whether it would make sense for them to switch. So what
> do people think?
When you get ready with the full patchset, I would be very interested
in watching how it performs in the various JBOD tests :-)
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-24 16:30 [PATCH RFC v2 0/1] Flexible proportions Jan Kara
2012-04-24 16:30 ` Jan Kara
2012-04-24 16:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2] lib: Proportions with flexible period Jan Kara
2012-04-24 16:30 ` Jan Kara
2012-05-01 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-01 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-25 2:10 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-04-25 2:10 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/1] Flexible proportions Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120425021011.GA5600@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.