All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König"
	<u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mxs: disable QUEUE when sending is done
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:33:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204281533.35277.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120428102601.GO20039-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>

Dear Uwe Kleine-König,

> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:51:56AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Wolfram,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> 
wrote:
> > >        if (i2c->cmd_err == -ENXIO)
> > >                mxs_i2c_reset(i2c);
> > > +       else
> > > +               writel(MXS_I2C_QUEUECTRL_QUEUE_RUN,
> > > +                               i2c->regs + MXS_I2C_QUEUECTRL_CLR);
> > 
> > When setting the QUEUE_RUN, do we really want to clear all the other
> > bits of QUEUECTRL_CLR register?
> > 
> > I am wondering if we should only set QUEUE_RUN bit here.
> 
> I didn't check the manual, but I guess writing to MXS_I2C_QUEUECTRL_CLR
> just clears the QUEUE_RUN bit and nothing else?!

I think the RUN bit will be cleared by the controller anyway, so this patch is 
pointless.

> 
> Best regards
> Uwe

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: mxs: disable QUEUE when sending is done
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:33:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204281533.35277.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120428102601.GO20039@pengutronix.de>

Dear Uwe Kleine-K?nig,

> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:51:56AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Wolfram,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> 
wrote:
> > >        if (i2c->cmd_err == -ENXIO)
> > >                mxs_i2c_reset(i2c);
> > > +       else
> > > +               writel(MXS_I2C_QUEUECTRL_QUEUE_RUN,
> > > +                               i2c->regs + MXS_I2C_QUEUECTRL_CLR);
> > 
> > When setting the QUEUE_RUN, do we really want to clear all the other
> > bits of QUEUECTRL_CLR register?
> > 
> > I am wondering if we should only set QUEUE_RUN bit here.
> 
> I didn't check the manual, but I guess writing to MXS_I2C_QUEUECTRL_CLR
> just clears the QUEUE_RUN bit and nothing else?!

I think the RUN bit will be cleared by the controller anyway, so this patch is 
pointless.

> 
> Best regards
> Uwe

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-28 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-27 14:23 [PATCH] i2c: mxs: disable QUEUE when sending is done Wolfram Sang
2012-04-27 14:23 ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found] ` <1335536631-28202-1-git-send-email-w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-27 14:51   ` Fabio Estevam
2012-04-27 14:51     ` Fabio Estevam
     [not found]     ` <CAOMZO5A1_Z7T5md61OJWmXbx2qCjFEByjyGvjhxqhfxzwfLEVQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-28 10:26       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-04-28 10:26         ` Uwe Kleine-König
     [not found]         ` <20120428102601.GO20039-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-28 13:33           ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-04-28 13:33             ` Marek Vasut
     [not found]             ` <201204281533.35277.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-29  8:43               ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-29  8:43                 ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found]                 ` <20120429084324.GA3001-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-29  9:11                   ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-29  9:11                     ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201204281533.35277.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marex-ynqeqjnshbs@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=festevam-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.