From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat
<FlorianSchandinat-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Split I2C_M_NOSTART support out of I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 09:58:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120503095814.GA3955@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120503095211.GC9574-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 303 bytes --]
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Also, I'd think the FUNC_NOSTART bit should be 0x08 and SMBUS_PEC 0x4000. This
> will be more intuitive, probably?
What is the value in renumbering everything? It just seems like it
makes the diff less clear and has no practical value.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat
<FlorianSchandinat-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Split I2C_M_NOSTART support out of I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 10:58:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120503095814.GA3955@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120503095211.GC9574-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 303 bytes --]
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Also, I'd think the FUNC_NOSTART bit should be 0x08 and SMBUS_PEC 0x4000. This
> will be more intuitive, probably?
What is the value in renumbering everything? It just seems like it
makes the diff less clear and has no practical value.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-03 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-26 12:37 [PATCH] i2c: Split I2C_M_NOSTART support out of I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING Mark Brown
2012-04-26 12:37 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1335443839-22872-1-git-send-email-broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-03 9:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-03 9:52 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120503095211.GC9574-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-03 9:58 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-05-03 9:58 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20120503095814.GA3955-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-03 10:58 ` Jean Delvare
2012-05-03 10:58 ` Jean Delvare
2012-05-03 11:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-03 11:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-03 10:53 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-03 10:53 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1336042416-28330-1-git-send-email-broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-03 11:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-03 11:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-04 8:39 ` Jean Delvare
2012-05-04 8:39 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120504103929.644a05ce-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-04 16:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-04 16:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-05-03 18:36 ` Jean Delvare
2012-05-03 18:36 ` Jean Delvare
2012-05-04 10:08 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-04 10:08 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-04 10:30 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-04 10:30 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-04 10:26 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-04 10:26 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-08 11:31 ` Jean Delvare
2012-05-08 11:31 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120503095814.GA3955@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=FlorianSchandinat-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.