[lm-sensors] [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp

[lm-sensors] [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
limited by hardcoded array size.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
 v4:
   - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
 v3:
   - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
 v2:
   - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
   - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
---
 drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |  119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index b9d5123..602bdc8 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -52,11 +53,9 @@ module_param_named(tjmax, force_tjmax, int, 0444);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(tjmax, "TjMax value in degrees Celsius");
 
 #define BASE_SYSFS_ATTR_NO	2	/* Sysfs Base attr no for coretemp */
-#define NUM_REAL_CORES		32	/* Number of Real cores per cpu */
 #define CORETEMP_NAME_LENGTH	17	/* String Length of attrs */
 #define MAX_CORE_ATTRS		4	/* Maximum no of basic attrs */
 #define TOTAL_ATTRS		(MAX_CORE_ATTRS + 1)
-#define MAX_CORE_DATA		(NUM_REAL_CORES + BASE_SYSFS_ATTR_NO)
 
 #define TO_PHYS_ID(cpu)		(cpu_data(cpu).phys_proc_id)
 #define TO_CORE_ID(cpu)		(cpu_data(cpu).cpu_core_id)
@@ -82,6 +81,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(tjmax, "TjMax value in degrees Celsius");
  * @valid: If this is 1, the current temperature is valid.
  */
 struct temp_data {
+	struct list_head list;
+	int id;
 	int temp;
 	int ttarget;
 	int tjmax;
@@ -101,7 +102,8 @@ struct temp_data {
 struct platform_data {
 	struct device *hwmon_dev;
 	u16 phys_proc_id;
-	struct temp_data *core_data[MAX_CORE_DATA];
+	struct list_head temp_data_list;
+	struct mutex temp_data_lock;
 	struct device_attribute name_attr;
 };
 
@@ -114,6 +116,20 @@ struct pdev_entry {
 static LIST_HEAD(pdev_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(pdev_list_mutex);
 
+static struct temp_data *get_temp_data(struct platform_data *pdata, int id)
+{
+	struct temp_data *tdata;
+
+	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list)
+		if (tdata->id = id)
+			goto out;
+	tdata = NULL;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	return tdata;
+}
+
 static ssize_t show_name(struct device *dev,
 			struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
 {
@@ -125,7 +141,7 @@ static ssize_t show_label(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
 	if (tdata->is_pkg_data)
 		return sprintf(buf, "Physical id %u\n", pdata->phys_proc_id);
@@ -139,7 +155,7 @@ static ssize_t show_crit_alarm(struct device *dev,
 	u32 eax, edx;
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
 	rdmsr_on_cpu(tdata->cpu, tdata->status_reg, &eax, &edx);
 
@@ -151,8 +167,9 @@ static ssize_t show_tjmax(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
-	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pdata->core_data[attr->index]->tjmax);
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", tdata->tjmax);
 }
 
 static ssize_t show_ttarget(struct device *dev,
@@ -160,8 +177,9 @@ static ssize_t show_ttarget(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
-	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pdata->core_data[attr->index]->ttarget);
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", tdata->ttarget);
 }
 
 static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
@@ -170,7 +188,7 @@ static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
 	u32 eax, edx;
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
 	mutex_lock(&tdata->update_lock);
 
@@ -423,7 +441,7 @@ static struct temp_data __cpuinit *init_temp_data(unsigned int cpu,
 	return tdata;
 }
 
-static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
+static int __cpuinit create_temp_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
 				unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
 {
 	struct temp_data *tdata;
@@ -440,9 +458,6 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	 */
 	attr_no = pkg_flag ? 1 : TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
 
-	if (attr_no > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
-		return -ERANGE;
-
 	/*
 	 * Provide a single set of attributes for all HT siblings of a core
 	 * to avoid duplicate sensors (the processor ID and core ID of all
@@ -450,7 +465,8 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	 * Skip if a HT sibling of this core is already registered.
 	 * This is not an error.
 	 */
-	if (pdata->core_data[attr_no] != NULL)
+	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
+	if (tdata)
 		return 0;
 
 	tdata = init_temp_data(cpu, pkg_flag);
@@ -480,16 +496,23 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		}
 	}
 
-	pdata->core_data[attr_no] = tdata;
+	tdata->id = attr_no;
+
+	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	list_add(&tdata->list, &pdata->temp_data_list);
+	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
 
 	/* Create sysfs interfaces */
 	err = create_core_attrs(tdata, &pdev->dev, attr_no);
 	if (err)
-		goto exit_free;
+		goto exit_list_del;
 
 	return 0;
+exit_list_del:
+	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	list_del(&tdata->list);
+	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
 exit_free:
-	pdata->core_data[attr_no] = NULL;
 	kfree(tdata);
 	return err;
 }
@@ -502,23 +525,20 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_add_core(unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
 	if (!pdev)
 		return;
 
-	err = create_core_data(pdev, cpu, pkg_flag);
+	err = create_temp_data(pdev, cpu, pkg_flag);
 	if (err)
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding Core %u failed\n", cpu);
 }
 
-static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata,
-				struct device *dev, int indx)
+static void coretemp_remove_core(struct temp_data *tdata, struct device *dev)
 {
 	int i;
-	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx];
 
 	/* Remove the sysfs attributes */
 	for (i = 0; i < tdata->attr_size; i++)
 		device_remove_file(dev, &tdata->sd_attrs[i].dev_attr);
 
-	kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]);
-	pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL;
+	kfree(tdata);
 }
 
 static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -536,6 +556,8 @@ static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto exit_free;
 
 	pdata->phys_proc_id = pdev->id;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdata->temp_data_list);
+	mutex_init(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pdata);
 
 	pdata->hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register(&pdev->dev);
@@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
 static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	int i;
+	struct temp_data *tdata;
 
-	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
-		if (pdata->core_data[i])
-			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
+	for (;;) {
+		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
+			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
+					struct temp_data, list);
+			list_del(&tdata->list);
+		} else
+			tdata = NULL;
+		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+
+		if (!tdata)
+			break;
+		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
+	}
 
 	device_remove_file(&pdev->dev, &pdata->name_attr);
 	hwmon_device_unregister(pdata->hwmon_dev);
@@ -641,16 +674,18 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
 
 static bool __cpuinit is_any_core_online(struct platform_data *pdata)
 {
-	int i;
+	struct temp_data *tdata;
+	bool ret = false;
 
-	/* Find online cores, except pkgtemp data */
-	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
-		if (pdata->core_data[i] &&
-			!pdata->core_data[i]->is_pkg_data) {
-			return true;
+	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list) {
+		if (!tdata->is_pkg_data) {
+			ret = true;
+			break;
 		}
 	}
-	return false;
+	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -697,9 +732,10 @@ static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
 
 static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	int i, indx;
+	int i, attr_no;
 	struct platform_data *pdata;
 	struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
+	struct temp_data *tdata;
 
 	/* If the physical CPU device does not exist, just return */
 	if (!pdev)
@@ -707,14 +743,15 @@ static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	indx = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
+	attr_no = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
 
-	/* The core id is too big, just return */
-	if (indx > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
-		return;
-
-	if (pdata->core_data[indx] && pdata->core_data[indx]->cpu = cpu)
-		coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, indx);
+	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
+	if (tdata && tdata->cpu = cpu) {
+		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+		list_del(&tdata->list);
+		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If a HT sibling of a core is taken offline, but another HT sibling
-- 
1.7.9.1


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

[PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp data

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
limited by hardcoded array size.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
 v4:
   - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
 v3:
   - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
 v2:
   - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
   - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
---
 drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |  119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index b9d5123..602bdc8 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -52,11 +53,9 @@ module_param_named(tjmax, force_tjmax, int, 0444);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(tjmax, "TjMax value in degrees Celsius");
 
 #define BASE_SYSFS_ATTR_NO	2	/* Sysfs Base attr no for coretemp */
-#define NUM_REAL_CORES		32	/* Number of Real cores per cpu */
 #define CORETEMP_NAME_LENGTH	17	/* String Length of attrs */
 #define MAX_CORE_ATTRS		4	/* Maximum no of basic attrs */
 #define TOTAL_ATTRS		(MAX_CORE_ATTRS + 1)
-#define MAX_CORE_DATA		(NUM_REAL_CORES + BASE_SYSFS_ATTR_NO)
 
 #define TO_PHYS_ID(cpu)		(cpu_data(cpu).phys_proc_id)
 #define TO_CORE_ID(cpu)		(cpu_data(cpu).cpu_core_id)
@@ -82,6 +81,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(tjmax, "TjMax value in degrees Celsius");
  * @valid: If this is 1, the current temperature is valid.
  */
 struct temp_data {
+	struct list_head list;
+	int id;
 	int temp;
 	int ttarget;
 	int tjmax;
@@ -101,7 +102,8 @@ struct temp_data {
 struct platform_data {
 	struct device *hwmon_dev;
 	u16 phys_proc_id;
-	struct temp_data *core_data[MAX_CORE_DATA];
+	struct list_head temp_data_list;
+	struct mutex temp_data_lock;
 	struct device_attribute name_attr;
 };
 
@@ -114,6 +116,20 @@ struct pdev_entry {
 static LIST_HEAD(pdev_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(pdev_list_mutex);
 
+static struct temp_data *get_temp_data(struct platform_data *pdata, int id)
+{
+	struct temp_data *tdata;
+
+	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list)
+		if (tdata->id == id)
+			goto out;
+	tdata = NULL;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	return tdata;
+}
+
 static ssize_t show_name(struct device *dev,
 			struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
 {
@@ -125,7 +141,7 @@ static ssize_t show_label(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
 	if (tdata->is_pkg_data)
 		return sprintf(buf, "Physical id %u\n", pdata->phys_proc_id);
@@ -139,7 +155,7 @@ static ssize_t show_crit_alarm(struct device *dev,
 	u32 eax, edx;
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
 	rdmsr_on_cpu(tdata->cpu, tdata->status_reg, &eax, &edx);
 
@@ -151,8 +167,9 @@ static ssize_t show_tjmax(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
-	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pdata->core_data[attr->index]->tjmax);
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", tdata->tjmax);
 }
 
 static ssize_t show_ttarget(struct device *dev,
@@ -160,8 +177,9 @@ static ssize_t show_ttarget(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
-	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pdata->core_data[attr->index]->ttarget);
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", tdata->ttarget);
 }
 
 static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
@@ -170,7 +188,7 @@ static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
 	u32 eax, edx;
 	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
 	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
+	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
 
 	mutex_lock(&tdata->update_lock);
 
@@ -423,7 +441,7 @@ static struct temp_data __cpuinit *init_temp_data(unsigned int cpu,
 	return tdata;
 }
 
-static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
+static int __cpuinit create_temp_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
 				unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
 {
 	struct temp_data *tdata;
@@ -440,9 +458,6 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	 */
 	attr_no = pkg_flag ? 1 : TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
 
-	if (attr_no > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
-		return -ERANGE;
-
 	/*
 	 * Provide a single set of attributes for all HT siblings of a core
 	 * to avoid duplicate sensors (the processor ID and core ID of all
@@ -450,7 +465,8 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	 * Skip if a HT sibling of this core is already registered.
 	 * This is not an error.
 	 */
-	if (pdata->core_data[attr_no] != NULL)
+	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
+	if (tdata)
 		return 0;
 
 	tdata = init_temp_data(cpu, pkg_flag);
@@ -480,16 +496,23 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		}
 	}
 
-	pdata->core_data[attr_no] = tdata;
+	tdata->id = attr_no;
+
+	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	list_add(&tdata->list, &pdata->temp_data_list);
+	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
 
 	/* Create sysfs interfaces */
 	err = create_core_attrs(tdata, &pdev->dev, attr_no);
 	if (err)
-		goto exit_free;
+		goto exit_list_del;
 
 	return 0;
+exit_list_del:
+	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	list_del(&tdata->list);
+	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
 exit_free:
-	pdata->core_data[attr_no] = NULL;
 	kfree(tdata);
 	return err;
 }
@@ -502,23 +525,20 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_add_core(unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
 	if (!pdev)
 		return;
 
-	err = create_core_data(pdev, cpu, pkg_flag);
+	err = create_temp_data(pdev, cpu, pkg_flag);
 	if (err)
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding Core %u failed\n", cpu);
 }
 
-static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata,
-				struct device *dev, int indx)
+static void coretemp_remove_core(struct temp_data *tdata, struct device *dev)
 {
 	int i;
-	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx];
 
 	/* Remove the sysfs attributes */
 	for (i = 0; i < tdata->attr_size; i++)
 		device_remove_file(dev, &tdata->sd_attrs[i].dev_attr);
 
-	kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]);
-	pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL;
+	kfree(tdata);
 }
 
 static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -536,6 +556,8 @@ static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto exit_free;
 
 	pdata->phys_proc_id = pdev->id;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdata->temp_data_list);
+	mutex_init(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pdata);
 
 	pdata->hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register(&pdev->dev);
@@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
 static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	int i;
+	struct temp_data *tdata;
 
-	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
-		if (pdata->core_data[i])
-			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
+	for (;;) {
+		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
+			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
+					struct temp_data, list);
+			list_del(&tdata->list);
+		} else
+			tdata = NULL;
+		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+
+		if (!tdata)
+			break;
+		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
+	}
 
 	device_remove_file(&pdev->dev, &pdata->name_attr);
 	hwmon_device_unregister(pdata->hwmon_dev);
@@ -641,16 +674,18 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
 
 static bool __cpuinit is_any_core_online(struct platform_data *pdata)
 {
-	int i;
+	struct temp_data *tdata;
+	bool ret = false;
 
-	/* Find online cores, except pkgtemp data */
-	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
-		if (pdata->core_data[i] &&
-			!pdata->core_data[i]->is_pkg_data) {
-			return true;
+	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list) {
+		if (!tdata->is_pkg_data) {
+			ret = true;
+			break;
 		}
 	}
-	return false;
+	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -697,9 +732,10 @@ static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
 
 static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	int i, indx;
+	int i, attr_no;
 	struct platform_data *pdata;
 	struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
+	struct temp_data *tdata;
 
 	/* If the physical CPU device does not exist, just return */
 	if (!pdev)
@@ -707,14 +743,15 @@ static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	indx = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
+	attr_no = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
 
-	/* The core id is too big, just return */
-	if (indx > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
-		return;
-
-	if (pdata->core_data[indx] && pdata->core_data[indx]->cpu == cpu)
-		coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, indx);
+	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
+	if (tdata && tdata->cpu == cpu) {
+		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+		list_del(&tdata->list);
+		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
+		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If a HT sibling of a core is taken offline, but another HT sibling
-- 
1.7.9.1

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp

[Guenter Roeck]

On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> limited by hardcoded array size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  v4:
>    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
>  v3:
>    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
>  v2:
>    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
>    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> ---

Hi Kirill,

unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...

>  drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |  119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> index b9d5123..602bdc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>  #include <asm/msr.h>
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
> @@ -52,11 +53,9 @@ module_param_named(tjmax, force_tjmax, int, 0444);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(tjmax, "TjMax value in degrees Celsius");
>  
>  #define BASE_SYSFS_ATTR_NO	2	/* Sysfs Base attr no for coretemp */
> -#define NUM_REAL_CORES		32	/* Number of Real cores per cpu */
>  #define CORETEMP_NAME_LENGTH	17	/* String Length of attrs */
>  #define MAX_CORE_ATTRS		4	/* Maximum no of basic attrs */
>  #define TOTAL_ATTRS		(MAX_CORE_ATTRS + 1)
> -#define MAX_CORE_DATA		(NUM_REAL_CORES + BASE_SYSFS_ATTR_NO)
>  
>  #define TO_PHYS_ID(cpu)		(cpu_data(cpu).phys_proc_id)
>  #define TO_CORE_ID(cpu)		(cpu_data(cpu).cpu_core_id)
> @@ -82,6 +81,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(tjmax, "TjMax value in degrees Celsius");
>   * @valid: If this is 1, the current temperature is valid.
>   */
>  struct temp_data {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	int id;
>  	int temp;
>  	int ttarget;
>  	int tjmax;
> @@ -101,7 +102,8 @@ struct temp_data {
>  struct platform_data {
>  	struct device *hwmon_dev;
>  	u16 phys_proc_id;
> -	struct temp_data *core_data[MAX_CORE_DATA];
> +	struct list_head temp_data_list;
> +	struct mutex temp_data_lock;
>  	struct device_attribute name_attr;
>  };
>  
> @@ -114,6 +116,20 @@ struct pdev_entry {
>  static LIST_HEAD(pdev_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(pdev_list_mutex);
>  
> +static struct temp_data *get_temp_data(struct platform_data *pdata, int id)
> +{
> +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list)
> +		if (tdata->id = id)
> +			goto out;
> +	tdata = NULL;
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	return tdata;
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t show_name(struct device *dev,
>  			struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
>  {
> @@ -125,7 +141,7 @@ static ssize_t show_label(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
>  	if (tdata->is_pkg_data)
>  		return sprintf(buf, "Physical id %u\n", pdata->phys_proc_id);
> @@ -139,7 +155,7 @@ static ssize_t show_crit_alarm(struct device *dev,
>  	u32 eax, edx;
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
>  	rdmsr_on_cpu(tdata->cpu, tdata->status_reg, &eax, &edx);
>  
> @@ -151,8 +167,9 @@ static ssize_t show_tjmax(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pdata->core_data[attr->index]->tjmax);
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", tdata->tjmax);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t show_ttarget(struct device *dev,
> @@ -160,8 +177,9 @@ static ssize_t show_ttarget(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pdata->core_data[attr->index]->ttarget);
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", tdata->ttarget);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
> @@ -170,7 +188,7 @@ static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
>  	u32 eax, edx;
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tdata->update_lock);
>  
> @@ -423,7 +441,7 @@ static struct temp_data __cpuinit *init_temp_data(unsigned int cpu,
>  	return tdata;
>  }
>  
> -static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +static int __cpuinit create_temp_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  				unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
>  {
>  	struct temp_data *tdata;
> @@ -440,9 +458,6 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	 */
>  	attr_no = pkg_flag ? 1 : TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
>  
> -	if (attr_no > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
> -		return -ERANGE;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Provide a single set of attributes for all HT siblings of a core
>  	 * to avoid duplicate sensors (the processor ID and core ID of all
> @@ -450,7 +465,8 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	 * Skip if a HT sibling of this core is already registered.
>  	 * This is not an error.
>  	 */
> -	if (pdata->core_data[attr_no] != NULL)
> +	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
> +	if (tdata)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	tdata = init_temp_data(cpu, pkg_flag);
> @@ -480,16 +496,23 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	pdata->core_data[attr_no] = tdata;
> +	tdata->id = attr_no;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	list_add(&tdata->list, &pdata->temp_data_list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
>  
>  	/* Create sysfs interfaces */
>  	err = create_core_attrs(tdata, &pdev->dev, attr_no);
>  	if (err)
> -		goto exit_free;
> +		goto exit_list_del;
>  
>  	return 0;
> +exit_list_del:
> +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	list_del(&tdata->list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
>  exit_free:
> -	pdata->core_data[attr_no] = NULL;
>  	kfree(tdata);
>  	return err;
>  }
> @@ -502,23 +525,20 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_add_core(unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
>  	if (!pdev)
>  		return;
>  
> -	err = create_core_data(pdev, cpu, pkg_flag);
> +	err = create_temp_data(pdev, cpu, pkg_flag);
>  	if (err)
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding Core %u failed\n", cpu);
>  }
>  
> -static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata,
> -				struct device *dev, int indx)
> +static void coretemp_remove_core(struct temp_data *tdata, struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx];
>  
>  	/* Remove the sysfs attributes */
>  	for (i = 0; i < tdata->attr_size; i++)
>  		device_remove_file(dev, &tdata->sd_attrs[i].dev_attr);
>  
> -	kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]);
> -	pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL;
> +	kfree(tdata);
>  }
>  
>  static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -536,6 +556,8 @@ static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto exit_free;
>  
>  	pdata->phys_proc_id = pdev->id;
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdata->temp_data_list);
> +	mutex_init(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pdata);
>  
>  	pdata->hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
>  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -	int i;
> +	struct temp_data *tdata;
>  
> -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> +	for (;;) {
> +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> +					struct temp_data, list);
> +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> +		} else
> +			tdata = NULL;
> +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +
> +		if (!tdata)
> +			break;
> +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> +	}
>  
Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.

I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
NULL.

>  	device_remove_file(&pdev->dev, &pdata->name_attr);
>  	hwmon_device_unregister(pdata->hwmon_dev);
> @@ -641,16 +674,18 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  static bool __cpuinit is_any_core_online(struct platform_data *pdata)
>  {
> -	int i;
> +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> +	bool ret = false;
>  
> -	/* Find online cores, except pkgtemp data */
> -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
> -		if (pdata->core_data[i] &&
> -			!pdata->core_data[i]->is_pkg_data) {
> -			return true;
> +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list) {
> +		if (!tdata->is_pkg_data) {

Actually, we don't need is_pkg_data anymore at all. Just test for
"tdata->id = 1" instead. That will simplify the code a bit.

> +			ret = true;
> +			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	return false;
> +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> @@ -697,9 +732,10 @@ static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -	int i, indx;
> +	int i, attr_no;
>  	struct platform_data *pdata;
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
> +	struct temp_data *tdata;
>  
>  	/* If the physical CPU device does not exist, just return */
>  	if (!pdev)
> @@ -707,14 +743,15 @@ static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  	pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> -	indx = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
> +	attr_no = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
>  
> -	/* The core id is too big, just return */
> -	if (indx > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (pdata->core_data[indx] && pdata->core_data[indx]->cpu = cpu)
> -		coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, indx);
> +	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
> +	if (tdata && tdata->cpu = cpu) {
> +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +		list_del(&tdata->list);
> +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);

Same race condition as above here.

> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If a HT sibling of a core is taken offline, but another HT sibling



_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

Re: [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp data

[Guenter Roeck]

On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> limited by hardcoded array size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  v4:
>    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
>  v3:
>    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
>  v2:
>    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
>    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> ---

Hi Kirill,

unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...

>  drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |  119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> index b9d5123..602bdc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>  #include <asm/msr.h>
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
> @@ -52,11 +53,9 @@ module_param_named(tjmax, force_tjmax, int, 0444);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(tjmax, "TjMax value in degrees Celsius");
>  
>  #define BASE_SYSFS_ATTR_NO	2	/* Sysfs Base attr no for coretemp */
> -#define NUM_REAL_CORES		32	/* Number of Real cores per cpu */
>  #define CORETEMP_NAME_LENGTH	17	/* String Length of attrs */
>  #define MAX_CORE_ATTRS		4	/* Maximum no of basic attrs */
>  #define TOTAL_ATTRS		(MAX_CORE_ATTRS + 1)
> -#define MAX_CORE_DATA		(NUM_REAL_CORES + BASE_SYSFS_ATTR_NO)
>  
>  #define TO_PHYS_ID(cpu)		(cpu_data(cpu).phys_proc_id)
>  #define TO_CORE_ID(cpu)		(cpu_data(cpu).cpu_core_id)
> @@ -82,6 +81,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(tjmax, "TjMax value in degrees Celsius");
>   * @valid: If this is 1, the current temperature is valid.
>   */
>  struct temp_data {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	int id;
>  	int temp;
>  	int ttarget;
>  	int tjmax;
> @@ -101,7 +102,8 @@ struct temp_data {
>  struct platform_data {
>  	struct device *hwmon_dev;
>  	u16 phys_proc_id;
> -	struct temp_data *core_data[MAX_CORE_DATA];
> +	struct list_head temp_data_list;
> +	struct mutex temp_data_lock;
>  	struct device_attribute name_attr;
>  };
>  
> @@ -114,6 +116,20 @@ struct pdev_entry {
>  static LIST_HEAD(pdev_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(pdev_list_mutex);
>  
> +static struct temp_data *get_temp_data(struct platform_data *pdata, int id)
> +{
> +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list)
> +		if (tdata->id == id)
> +			goto out;
> +	tdata = NULL;
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	return tdata;
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t show_name(struct device *dev,
>  			struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
>  {
> @@ -125,7 +141,7 @@ static ssize_t show_label(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
>  	if (tdata->is_pkg_data)
>  		return sprintf(buf, "Physical id %u\n", pdata->phys_proc_id);
> @@ -139,7 +155,7 @@ static ssize_t show_crit_alarm(struct device *dev,
>  	u32 eax, edx;
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
>  	rdmsr_on_cpu(tdata->cpu, tdata->status_reg, &eax, &edx);
>  
> @@ -151,8 +167,9 @@ static ssize_t show_tjmax(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pdata->core_data[attr->index]->tjmax);
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", tdata->tjmax);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t show_ttarget(struct device *dev,
> @@ -160,8 +177,9 @@ static ssize_t show_ttarget(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pdata->core_data[attr->index]->ttarget);
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", tdata->ttarget);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
> @@ -170,7 +188,7 @@ static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
>  	u32 eax, edx;
>  	struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[attr->index];
> +	struct temp_data *tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr->index);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tdata->update_lock);
>  
> @@ -423,7 +441,7 @@ static struct temp_data __cpuinit *init_temp_data(unsigned int cpu,
>  	return tdata;
>  }
>  
> -static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +static int __cpuinit create_temp_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  				unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
>  {
>  	struct temp_data *tdata;
> @@ -440,9 +458,6 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	 */
>  	attr_no = pkg_flag ? 1 : TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
>  
> -	if (attr_no > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
> -		return -ERANGE;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Provide a single set of attributes for all HT siblings of a core
>  	 * to avoid duplicate sensors (the processor ID and core ID of all
> @@ -450,7 +465,8 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	 * Skip if a HT sibling of this core is already registered.
>  	 * This is not an error.
>  	 */
> -	if (pdata->core_data[attr_no] != NULL)
> +	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
> +	if (tdata)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	tdata = init_temp_data(cpu, pkg_flag);
> @@ -480,16 +496,23 @@ static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	pdata->core_data[attr_no] = tdata;
> +	tdata->id = attr_no;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	list_add(&tdata->list, &pdata->temp_data_list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
>  
>  	/* Create sysfs interfaces */
>  	err = create_core_attrs(tdata, &pdev->dev, attr_no);
>  	if (err)
> -		goto exit_free;
> +		goto exit_list_del;
>  
>  	return 0;
> +exit_list_del:
> +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	list_del(&tdata->list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
>  exit_free:
> -	pdata->core_data[attr_no] = NULL;
>  	kfree(tdata);
>  	return err;
>  }
> @@ -502,23 +525,20 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_add_core(unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
>  	if (!pdev)
>  		return;
>  
> -	err = create_core_data(pdev, cpu, pkg_flag);
> +	err = create_temp_data(pdev, cpu, pkg_flag);
>  	if (err)
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding Core %u failed\n", cpu);
>  }
>  
> -static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata,
> -				struct device *dev, int indx)
> +static void coretemp_remove_core(struct temp_data *tdata, struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -	struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx];
>  
>  	/* Remove the sysfs attributes */
>  	for (i = 0; i < tdata->attr_size; i++)
>  		device_remove_file(dev, &tdata->sd_attrs[i].dev_attr);
>  
> -	kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]);
> -	pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL;
> +	kfree(tdata);
>  }
>  
>  static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -536,6 +556,8 @@ static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto exit_free;
>  
>  	pdata->phys_proc_id = pdev->id;
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdata->temp_data_list);
> +	mutex_init(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pdata);
>  
>  	pdata->hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
>  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -	int i;
> +	struct temp_data *tdata;
>  
> -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> +	for (;;) {
> +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> +					struct temp_data, list);
> +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> +		} else
> +			tdata = NULL;
> +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +
> +		if (!tdata)
> +			break;
> +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> +	}
>  
Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.

I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
NULL.

>  	device_remove_file(&pdev->dev, &pdata->name_attr);
>  	hwmon_device_unregister(pdata->hwmon_dev);
> @@ -641,16 +674,18 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  static bool __cpuinit is_any_core_online(struct platform_data *pdata)
>  {
> -	int i;
> +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> +	bool ret = false;
>  
> -	/* Find online cores, except pkgtemp data */
> -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
> -		if (pdata->core_data[i] &&
> -			!pdata->core_data[i]->is_pkg_data) {
> -			return true;
> +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list) {
> +		if (!tdata->is_pkg_data) {

Actually, we don't need is_pkg_data anymore at all. Just test for
"tdata->id == 1" instead. That will simplify the code a bit.

> +			ret = true;
> +			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	return false;
> +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> @@ -697,9 +732,10 @@ static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -	int i, indx;
> +	int i, attr_no;
>  	struct platform_data *pdata;
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
> +	struct temp_data *tdata;
>  
>  	/* If the physical CPU device does not exist, just return */
>  	if (!pdev)
> @@ -707,14 +743,15 @@ static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  	pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> -	indx = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
> +	attr_no = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
>  
> -	/* The core id is too big, just return */
> -	if (indx > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (pdata->core_data[indx] && pdata->core_data[indx]->cpu == cpu)
> -		coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, indx);
> +	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
> +	if (tdata && tdata->cpu == cpu) {
> +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +		list_del(&tdata->list);
> +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);

Same race condition as above here.

> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If a HT sibling of a core is taken offline, but another HT sibling

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4510 bytes --]

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  v4:
> >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> >  v3:
> >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> >  v2:
> >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > ---
> 
> Hi Kirill,
> 
> unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...

Ughh..

> > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > -	int i;
> > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> >  
> > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > +	for (;;) {
> > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > +		} else
> > +			tdata = NULL;
> > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +
> > +		if (!tdata)
> > +			break;
> > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > +	}
> >  
> Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> 
> I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
> after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> NULL.

I think

if (tdata)
	return -ENODEV;

in show methods will fix the issue. Right?

> 
> >  	device_remove_file(&pdev->dev, &pdata->name_attr);
> >  	hwmon_device_unregister(pdata->hwmon_dev);
> > @@ -641,16 +674,18 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
> >  
> >  static bool __cpuinit is_any_core_online(struct platform_data *pdata)
> >  {
> > -	int i;
> > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > +	bool ret = false;
> >  
> > -	/* Find online cores, except pkgtemp data */
> > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
> > -		if (pdata->core_data[i] &&
> > -			!pdata->core_data[i]->is_pkg_data) {
> > -			return true;
> > +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list) {
> > +		if (!tdata->is_pkg_data) {
> 
> Actually, we don't need is_pkg_data anymore at all. Just test for
> "tdata->id == 1" instead. That will simplify the code a bit.

Okay, I'll update this.

> > +			ret = true;
> > +			break;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -	return false;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> > @@ -697,9 +732,10 @@ static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> >  
> >  static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> >  {
> > -	int i, indx;
> > +	int i, attr_no;
> >  	struct platform_data *pdata;
> >  	struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
> > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> >  
> >  	/* If the physical CPU device does not exist, just return */
> >  	if (!pdev)
> > @@ -707,14 +743,15 @@ static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> >  
> >  	pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >  
> > -	indx = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
> > +	attr_no = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
> >  
> > -	/* The core id is too big, just return */
> > -	if (indx > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
> > -		return;
> > -
> > -	if (pdata->core_data[indx] && pdata->core_data[indx]->cpu == cpu)
> > -		coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, indx);
> > +	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
> > +	if (tdata && tdata->cpu == cpu) {
> > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +		list_del(&tdata->list);
> > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> 
> Same race condition as above here.
> 
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If a HT sibling of a core is taken offline, but another HT sibling
> 
> 

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

Re: [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp data

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4510 bytes --]

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  v4:
> >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> >  v3:
> >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> >  v2:
> >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > ---
> 
> Hi Kirill,
> 
> unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...

Ughh..

> > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > -	int i;
> > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> >  
> > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > +	for (;;) {
> > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > +		} else
> > +			tdata = NULL;
> > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +
> > +		if (!tdata)
> > +			break;
> > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > +	}
> >  
> Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> 
> I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
> after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> NULL.

I think

if (tdata)
	return -ENODEV;

in show methods will fix the issue. Right?

> 
> >  	device_remove_file(&pdev->dev, &pdata->name_attr);
> >  	hwmon_device_unregister(pdata->hwmon_dev);
> > @@ -641,16 +674,18 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
> >  
> >  static bool __cpuinit is_any_core_online(struct platform_data *pdata)
> >  {
> > -	int i;
> > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > +	bool ret = false;
> >  
> > -	/* Find online cores, except pkgtemp data */
> > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
> > -		if (pdata->core_data[i] &&
> > -			!pdata->core_data[i]->is_pkg_data) {
> > -			return true;
> > +	mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +	list_for_each_entry(tdata, &pdata->temp_data_list, list) {
> > +		if (!tdata->is_pkg_data) {
> 
> Actually, we don't need is_pkg_data anymore at all. Just test for
> "tdata->id == 1" instead. That will simplify the code a bit.

Okay, I'll update this.

> > +			ret = true;
> > +			break;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -	return false;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> > @@ -697,9 +732,10 @@ static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> >  
> >  static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> >  {
> > -	int i, indx;
> > +	int i, attr_no;
> >  	struct platform_data *pdata;
> >  	struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
> > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> >  
> >  	/* If the physical CPU device does not exist, just return */
> >  	if (!pdev)
> > @@ -707,14 +743,15 @@ static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> >  
> >  	pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >  
> > -	indx = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
> > +	attr_no = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
> >  
> > -	/* The core id is too big, just return */
> > -	if (indx > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
> > -		return;
> > -
> > -	if (pdata->core_data[indx] && pdata->core_data[indx]->cpu == cpu)
> > -		coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, indx);
> > +	tdata = get_temp_data(pdata, attr_no);
> > +	if (tdata && tdata->cpu == cpu) {
> > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +		list_del(&tdata->list);
> > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> 
> Same race condition as above here.
> 
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If a HT sibling of a core is taken offline, but another HT sibling
> 
> 

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2466 bytes --]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  v4:
> > >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> > >  v3:
> > >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> > >  v2:
> > >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> > >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > > ---
> > 
> > Hi Kirill,
> > 
> > unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...
> 
> Ughh..
> 
> > > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> > >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > -	int i;
> > > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > >  
> > > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > > +	for (;;) {
> > > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > > +		} else
> > > +			tdata = NULL;
> > > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > +
> > > +		if (!tdata)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > > +	}
> > >  
> > Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> > entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> > 
> > I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> > mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()

I haven't got how list_for_each_entry_safe() will be really safe without
the lock.

> > after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> > remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> > NULL.
> 
> I think
> 
> if (tdata)
> 	return -ENODEV;
> 
> in show methods will fix the issue. Right?

It won't. Stupid me.

But the check + kref seems will work...

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

Re: [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp data

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2466 bytes --]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  v4:
> > >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> > >  v3:
> > >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> > >  v2:
> > >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> > >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > > ---
> > 
> > Hi Kirill,
> > 
> > unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...
> 
> Ughh..
> 
> > > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> > >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > -	int i;
> > > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > >  
> > > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > > +	for (;;) {
> > > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > > +		} else
> > > +			tdata = NULL;
> > > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > +
> > > +		if (!tdata)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > > +	}
> > >  
> > Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> > entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> > 
> > I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> > mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()

I haven't got how list_for_each_entry_safe() will be really safe without
the lock.

> > after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> > remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> > NULL.
> 
> I think
> 
> if (tdata)
> 	return -ENODEV;
> 
> in show methods will fix the issue. Right?

It won't. Stupid me.

But the check + kref seems will work...

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp

[Guenter Roeck]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:23:39AM -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > > > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  v4:
> > > >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> > > >  v3:
> > > >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> > > >  v2:
> > > >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> > > >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Hi Kirill,
> > > 
> > > unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...
> > 
> > Ughh..
> > 
> > > > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> > > >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > -	int i;
> > > > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > > >  
> > > > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > > > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > > > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > > > +	for (;;) {
> > > > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > > > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > > > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > > > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > > > +		} else
> > > > +			tdata = NULL;
> > > > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (!tdata)
> > > > +			break;
> > > > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > > > +	}
> > > >  
> > > Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> > > entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> > > 
> > > I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> > > mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
> 
> I haven't got how list_for_each_entry_safe() will be really safe without
> the lock.
> 
We know that it by itself won't be called multiple times. So the only question is 
if the functions to add/remove a core can be called while coretemp_remove is called,
or if that is mutually exclusive (not that the current code handles this case).

Fortunately, there is a function to block CPU removal/insertion: get_online_cpus()
and put_online_cpus(). I have no idea if it is necessary to protect coretemp_remove()
with it, but it might be on the safe side anyway.

> > > after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> > > remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> > > NULL.
> > 
> > I think
> > 
> > if (tdata)
> > 	return -ENODEV;
> > 
> > in show methods will fix the issue. Right?
> 
> It won't. Stupid me.
> 
> But the check + kref seems will work...
> 
Yes, but would be way too complicated.

Guenter


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

Re: [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp data

[Guenter Roeck]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:23:39AM -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > > > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  v4:
> > > >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> > > >  v3:
> > > >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> > > >  v2:
> > > >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> > > >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Hi Kirill,
> > > 
> > > unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...
> > 
> > Ughh..
> > 
> > > > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> > > >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > -	int i;
> > > > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > > >  
> > > > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > > > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > > > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > > > +	for (;;) {
> > > > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > > > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > > > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > > > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > > > +		} else
> > > > +			tdata = NULL;
> > > > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (!tdata)
> > > > +			break;
> > > > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > > > +	}
> > > >  
> > > Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> > > entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> > > 
> > > I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> > > mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
> 
> I haven't got how list_for_each_entry_safe() will be really safe without
> the lock.
> 
We know that it by itself won't be called multiple times. So the only question is 
if the functions to add/remove a core can be called while coretemp_remove is called,
or if that is mutually exclusive (not that the current code handles this case).

Fortunately, there is a function to block CPU removal/insertion: get_online_cpus()
and put_online_cpus(). I have no idea if it is necessary to protect coretemp_remove()
with it, but it might be on the safe side anyway.

> > > after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> > > remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> > > NULL.
> > 
> > I think
> > 
> > if (tdata)
> > 	return -ENODEV;
> > 
> > in show methods will fix the issue. Right?
> 
> It won't. Stupid me.
> 
> But the check + kref seems will work...
> 
Yes, but would be way too complicated.

Guenter

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3643 bytes --]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 02:56:17AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:23:39AM -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > > > > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  v4:
> > > > >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> > > > >  v3:
> > > > >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> > > > >  v2:
> > > > >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> > > > >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Kirill,
> > > > 
> > > > unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...
> > > 
> > > Ughh..
> > > 
> > > > > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> > > > >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > > -	int i;
> > > > > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > > > >  
> > > > > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > > > > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > > > > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > > > > +	for (;;) {
> > > > > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > > > > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > > > > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > > > > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > > > > +		} else
> > > > > +			tdata = NULL;
> > > > > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		if (!tdata)
> > > > > +			break;
> > > > > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > > > > +	}
> > > > >  
> > > > Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> > > > entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> > > > 
> > > > I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> > > > mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
> > 
> > I haven't got how list_for_each_entry_safe() will be really safe without
> > the lock.
> > 
> We know that it by itself won't be called multiple times. So the only question is 
> if the functions to add/remove a core can be called while coretemp_remove is called,
> or if that is mutually exclusive (not that the current code handles this case).
> 
> Fortunately, there is a function to block CPU removal/insertion: get_online_cpus()
> and put_online_cpus(). I have no idea if it is necessary to protect coretemp_remove()
> with it, but it might be on the safe side anyway.
> 
> > > > after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> > > > remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> > > > NULL.
> > > 
> > > I think
> > > 
> > > if (tdata)
> > > 	return -ENODEV;
> > > 
> > > in show methods will fix the issue. Right?
> > 
> > It won't. Stupid me.
> > 
> > But the check + kref seems will work...
> > 
> Yes, but would be way too complicated.

More code, yes, but complicated? What you propose looks like a trick. It
has too many assumptions on context.

I personally prefer kref since it's straight forward and more friendly for
future changes.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

Re: [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp data

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3643 bytes --]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 02:56:17AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:23:39AM -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > > > > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  v4:
> > > > >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> > > > >  v3:
> > > > >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> > > > >  v2:
> > > > >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> > > > >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Kirill,
> > > > 
> > > > unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...
> > > 
> > > Ughh..
> > > 
> > > > > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> > > > >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > > -	int i;
> > > > > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > > > >  
> > > > > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > > > > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > > > > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > > > > +	for (;;) {
> > > > > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > > > > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > > > > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > > > > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > > > > +		} else
> > > > > +			tdata = NULL;
> > > > > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		if (!tdata)
> > > > > +			break;
> > > > > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > > > > +	}
> > > > >  
> > > > Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> > > > entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> > > > 
> > > > I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> > > > mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
> > 
> > I haven't got how list_for_each_entry_safe() will be really safe without
> > the lock.
> > 
> We know that it by itself won't be called multiple times. So the only question is 
> if the functions to add/remove a core can be called while coretemp_remove is called,
> or if that is mutually exclusive (not that the current code handles this case).
> 
> Fortunately, there is a function to block CPU removal/insertion: get_online_cpus()
> and put_online_cpus(). I have no idea if it is necessary to protect coretemp_remove()
> with it, but it might be on the safe side anyway.
> 
> > > > after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> > > > remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> > > > NULL.
> > > 
> > > I think
> > > 
> > > if (tdata)
> > > 	return -ENODEV;
> > > 
> > > in show methods will fix the issue. Right?
> > 
> > It won't. Stupid me.
> > 
> > But the check + kref seems will work...
> > 
> Yes, but would be way too complicated.

More code, yes, but complicated? What you propose looks like a trick. It
has too many assumptions on context.

I personally prefer kref since it's straight forward and more friendly for
future changes.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp

[Guenter Roeck]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 06:16:34AM -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 02:56:17AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:23:39AM -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > > > > > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  v4:
> > > > > >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> > > > > >  v3:
> > > > > >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> > > > > >  v2:
> > > > > >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> > > > > >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi Kirill,
> > > > > 
> > > > > unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...
> > > > 
> > > > Ughh..
> > > > 
> > > > > > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> > > > > >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > > > -	int i;
> > > > > > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > > > > > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > > > > > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > > > > > +	for (;;) {
> > > > > > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > > > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > > > > > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > > > > > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > > > > > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > > > > > +		} else
> > > > > > +			tdata = NULL;
> > > > > > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +		if (!tdata)
> > > > > > +			break;
> > > > > > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > > >  
> > > > > Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> > > > > entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> > > > > mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
> > > 
> > > I haven't got how list_for_each_entry_safe() will be really safe without
> > > the lock.
> > > 
> > We know that it by itself won't be called multiple times. So the only question is 
> > if the functions to add/remove a core can be called while coretemp_remove is called,
> > or if that is mutually exclusive (not that the current code handles this case).
> > 
> > Fortunately, there is a function to block CPU removal/insertion: get_online_cpus()
> > and put_online_cpus(). I have no idea if it is necessary to protect coretemp_remove()
> > with it, but it might be on the safe side anyway.
> > 
> > > > > after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> > > > > remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> > > > > NULL.
> > > > 
> > > > I think
> > > > 
> > > > if (tdata)
> > > > 	return -ENODEV;
> > > > 
> > > > in show methods will fix the issue. Right?
> > > 
> > > It won't. Stupid me.
> > > 
> > > But the check + kref seems will work...
> > > 
> > Yes, but would be way too complicated.
> 
> More code, yes, but complicated? What you propose looks like a trick. It
> has too many assumptions on context.
> 

There is an even better solution: unregistering the hotplug notifier
before removing the driver. And, as you will notice, that is already done.
So list_for_each_entry_safe() is safe after all, since no other remove/add
activity will occur at the same time.

> I personally prefer kref since it's straight forward and more friendly for
> future changes.
> 
Guess we have to agree to disagree on that one.

Thanks,
Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

Re: [PATCH, v4] hwmon: coretemp: use list instead of fixed size array for temp data

[Guenter Roeck]

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 06:16:34AM -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 02:56:17AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:23:39AM -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:49 -0400, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Let's rework code to allow arbitrary number of cores on a CPU, not
> > > > > > limited by hardcoded array size.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  v4:
> > > > > >    - address issues pointed by Guenter Roeck;
> > > > > >  v3:
> > > > > >    - drop redundant refcounting and checks;
> > > > > >  v2:
> > > > > >    - fix NULL pointer dereference. Thanks to R, Durgadoss;
> > > > > >    - use mutex instead of spinlock for list locking.
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi Kirill,
> > > > > 
> > > > > unfortunately now we have another race condition :(. See below ...
> > > > 
> > > > Ughh..
> > > > 
> > > > > > @@ -557,11 +579,22 @@ exit_free:
> > > > > >  static int __devexit coretemp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > >  	struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > > > -	int i;
> > > > > > +	struct temp_data *tdata;
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > -	for (i = MAX_CORE_DATA - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> > > > > > -		if (pdata->core_data[i])
> > > > > > -			coretemp_remove_core(pdata, &pdev->dev, i);
> > > > > > +	for (;;) {
> > > > > > +		mutex_lock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > > > +		if (!list_empty(&pdata->temp_data_list)) {
> > > > > > +			tdata = list_first_entry(&pdata->temp_data_list,
> > > > > > +					struct temp_data, list);
> > > > > > +			list_del(&tdata->list);
> > > > > > +		} else
> > > > > > +			tdata = NULL;
> > > > > > +		mutex_unlock(&pdata->temp_data_lock);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +		if (!tdata)
> > > > > > +			break;
> > > > > > +		coretemp_remove_core(tdata, &pdev->dev);
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > > >  
> > > > > Unfortunately, that results in a race condition, since the tdata list
> > > > > entry is gone before the attribute file is deleted.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think you can still use list_for_each_entry_safe, only outside the
> > > > > mutex, and remove the list entry at the end of coretemp_remove_core()
> > > 
> > > I haven't got how list_for_each_entry_safe() will be really safe without
> > > the lock.
> > > 
> > We know that it by itself won't be called multiple times. So the only question is 
> > if the functions to add/remove a core can be called while coretemp_remove is called,
> > or if that is mutually exclusive (not that the current code handles this case).
> > 
> > Fortunately, there is a function to block CPU removal/insertion: get_online_cpus()
> > and put_online_cpus(). I have no idea if it is necessary to protect coretemp_remove()
> > with it, but it might be on the safe side anyway.
> > 
> > > > > after deleting the attribute file. Just keep the code as it was, and
> > > > > remove the list entry (mutex-protected) where core_data[] was set to
> > > > > NULL.
> > > > 
> > > > I think
> > > > 
> > > > if (tdata)
> > > > 	return -ENODEV;
> > > > 
> > > > in show methods will fix the issue. Right?
> > > 
> > > It won't. Stupid me.
> > > 
> > > But the check + kref seems will work...
> > > 
> > Yes, but would be way too complicated.
> 
> More code, yes, but complicated? What you propose looks like a trick. It
> has too many assumptions on context.
> 

There is an even better solution: unregistering the hotplug notifier
before removing the driver. And, as you will notice, that is already done.
So list_for_each_entry_safe() is safe after all, since no other remove/add
activity will occur at the same time.

> I personally prefer kref since it's straight forward and more friendly for
> future changes.
> 
Guess we have to agree to disagree on that one.

Thanks,
Guenter