From: agk@sourceware.org <agk@sourceware.org>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: LVM2 ./WHATS_NEW lib/activate/dev_manager.c
Date: 16 May 2012 12:50:17 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120516125017.8063.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
CVSROOT: /cvs/lvm2
Module name: LVM2
Changes by: agk at sourceware.org 2012-05-16 12:50:16
Modified files:
. : WHATS_NEW
lib/activate : dev_manager.c
Log message:
Re-enable partial activation of non-thin LVs until it can be fixed. (2.02.90)
- The test should be checking the LV as a whole, not just individual segments.
Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/WHATS_NEW.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.2405&r2=1.2406
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/LVM2/lib/activate/dev_manager.c.diff?cvsroot=lvm2&r1=1.278&r2=1.279
--- LVM2/WHATS_NEW 2012/05/14 16:18:58 1.2405
+++ LVM2/WHATS_NEW 2012/05/16 12:50:14 1.2406
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
Version 2.02.96 -
================================
+ Re-enable partial activation of non-thin LVs until it can be fixed. (2.02.90)
Fix alloc cling to cling to PVs already found with contiguous policy.
Fix cling policy not to behave like normal policy if no previous LV seg.
Fix allocation loop not to use later policies when --alloc cling without tags.
--- LVM2/lib/activate/dev_manager.c 2012/04/24 00:51:26 1.278
+++ LVM2/lib/activate/dev_manager.c 2012/05/16 12:50:15 1.279
@@ -1581,22 +1581,6 @@
seg->lv->vg->name, seg->lv->name);
return 0;
}
-
- /*
- * Mirrors activate LVs replaced with error targets and
- * RAID can handle non-accessible sub-LVs.
- *
- * TODO: Can we eventually skip to activate such LVs ?
- */
- if (!num_existing_areas &&
- !strstr(seg->lv->name, "_rmeta_") &&
- !strstr(seg->lv->name, "_rimage_") &&
- !strstr(seg->lv->name, "_mimage_") &&
- !((name = strstr(seg->lv->name, "_mlog")) && !name[5])) {
- log_error("Cannot activate %s/%s: all segments missing.",
- seg->lv->vg->name, seg->lv->name);
- return 0;
- }
}
return 1;
next reply other threads:[~2012-05-16 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 12:50 agk [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-20 14:17 LVM2 ./WHATS_NEW lib/activate/dev_manager.c jbrassow
2012-03-05 14:15 zkabelac
2012-02-01 13:47 zkabelac
2012-01-28 20:12 zkabelac
2012-01-23 20:56 jbrassow
2012-01-20 21:56 snitzer
2011-12-21 12:59 zkabelac
2011-11-18 19:42 zkabelac
2011-10-11 8:59 zkabelac
2011-10-11 8:57 zkabelac
2011-08-11 4:18 jbrassow
2011-07-06 0:29 agk
2011-07-05 23:10 agk
2011-01-05 14:03 zkabelac
2010-12-08 19:26 agk
2010-10-25 10:37 agk
2010-10-24 17:36 snitzer
2010-08-26 14:21 jbrassow
2010-08-17 1:51 agk
2010-08-03 13:13 zkabelac
2010-05-24 9:01 zkabelac
2010-05-21 14:47 zkabelac
2010-02-08 23:28 snitzer
2010-01-26 7:58 mbroz
2010-01-22 15:40 snitzer
2009-08-03 18:09 agk
2009-05-28 1:11 agk
2009-05-13 14:13 zkabelac
2008-12-19 15:23 mbroz
2008-06-05 12:45 agk
2007-05-14 11:27 mbroz
2007-03-08 19:58 agk
2006-11-20 16:45 agk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120516125017.8063.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=agk@sourceware.org \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.