From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, horms@verge.net.au,
grant.likely@secretlab.ca, lethal@linux-sh.org, olof@lixom.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Emma Mobile GPIO driver V2
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 20:05:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205162205.09082.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb4iHomtj5Ue=HmHLLvH==wLuSoMA+uwrp3vTBAPnQr_g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Do you guys have any preferences how to merge this?
> >
> > Can I include it together with the EMEV2 SoC bits perhaps? That may be
> > easy so we can keep track of the platform data header file dependency.
>
> For ux500 I made a special "gpio and pins" branch and sent through ARM SoC.
The problem is we have a patch depending on the $subject one in the EMEV2
series and it would be better to keep them both together if that's not
a big deal.
Thanks,
Rafael
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, horms@verge.net.au,
grant.likely@secretlab.ca, lethal@linux-sh.org, olof@lixom.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Emma Mobile GPIO driver V2
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:05:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205162205.09082.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb4iHomtj5Ue=HmHLLvH==wLuSoMA+uwrp3vTBAPnQr_g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Do you guys have any preferences how to merge this?
> >
> > Can I include it together with the EMEV2 SoC bits perhaps? That may be
> > easy so we can keep track of the platform data header file dependency.
>
> For ux500 I made a special "gpio and pins" branch and sent through ARM SoC.
The problem is we have a patch depending on the $subject one in the EMEV2
series and it would be better to keep them both together if that's not
a big deal.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-16 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-15 15:43 [PATCH] gpio: Emma Mobile GPIO driver V2 Magnus Damm
2012-05-15 15:43 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-15 16:32 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-15 16:32 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-17 6:20 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-17 6:20 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-16 7:11 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-16 7:11 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-16 10:15 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-16 10:15 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-16 11:25 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-16 11:25 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-16 20:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-05-16 20:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-16 22:22 ` Olof Johansson
2012-05-16 22:22 ` Olof Johansson
2012-05-16 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-16 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-16 22:54 ` Olof Johansson
2012-05-16 22:54 ` Olof Johansson
2012-05-18 22:56 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-18 22:56 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-19 1:18 ` Olof Johansson
2012-05-19 1:18 ` Olof Johansson
2012-05-19 1:44 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-19 1:44 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-19 2:27 ` Olof Johansson
2012-05-19 2:27 ` Olof Johansson
2012-05-19 12:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-19 12:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-16 7:29 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-16 7:29 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-16 10:09 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-16 10:09 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-16 12:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-16 15:47 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-16 15:47 ` Magnus Damm
2012-05-17 0:41 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-17 0:41 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-18 23:25 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-18 23:25 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-19 6:46 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-19 6:46 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-19 20:05 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-19 20:05 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-18 22:57 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-18 22:57 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-19 2:13 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-19 2:13 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201205162205.09082.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.