From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>, Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>,
Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>, Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] iscsi-target: remove some dead code
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:26:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517102622.GM16984@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB4CBD0.8000503@bfs.de>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:58:40AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.05.2012 09:08, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > Neither "acceptor_values" nor "proposer_values" can be NULL here.
> > Smatch complains because we are not allowed to pass NULL pointers to
> > strchr().
> >
> > Also I removed a second later check for "!acceptor_values" because it
> > gets checked on the next line in the do while condition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > Compile tested only. Please review carefully.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c
> > index ad3b3c1..ed5241e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c
> > @@ -1037,13 +1037,6 @@ static char *iscsi_check_valuelist_for_support(
> > tmp2 = strchr(acceptor_values, ',');
> > if (tmp2)
> > *tmp2 = '\0';
> this looks like strchrnul(). I realy do not know is this supported inside the kernel ?
>
It can't be NULL here. Adding bogus checks is the wrong idea and
static checkers are right to ask about needless checks.
regards,
dan carpenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>, Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>,
Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>, Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] iscsi-target: remove some dead code
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:26:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517102622.GM16984@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB4CBD0.8000503@bfs.de>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:58:40AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.05.2012 09:08, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > Neither "acceptor_values" nor "proposer_values" can be NULL here.
> > Smatch complains because we are not allowed to pass NULL pointers to
> > strchr().
> >
> > Also I removed a second later check for "!acceptor_values" because it
> > gets checked on the next line in the do while condition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > Compile tested only. Please review carefully.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c
> > index ad3b3c1..ed5241e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c
> > @@ -1037,13 +1037,6 @@ static char *iscsi_check_valuelist_for_support(
> > tmp2 = strchr(acceptor_values, ',');
> > if (tmp2)
> > *tmp2 = '\0';
> this looks like strchrnul(). I realy do not know is this supported inside the kernel ?
>
It can't be NULL here. Adding bogus checks is the wrong idea and
static checkers are right to ask about needless checks.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 7:08 [patch] iscsi-target: remove some dead code Dan Carpenter
2012-05-17 7:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-05-17 7:39 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-05-17 7:39 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-05-17 9:58 ` walter harms
2012-05-17 9:58 ` walter harms
2012-05-17 10:26 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2012-05-17 10:26 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-05-17 15:15 ` Jörn Engel
2012-05-17 15:15 ` Jörn Engel
2012-05-17 10:30 ` walter harms
2012-05-17 11:55 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120517102622.GM16984@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=agrover@redhat.com \
--cc=jj@chaosbits.net \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=wharms@bfs.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.