All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] GPIO: MIPS: lantiq: convert gpio-mm-lantiq to OF and of_mm_gpio
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:34:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517183459.9C9B83E0621@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337201394-11431-2-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org>

On Wed, 16 May 2012 22:49:53 +0200, John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> wrote:
> Implements OF support and convert to of_mm_gpio.
> 
> By attaching hardware latches to the External Bus Unit (EBU) on Lantiq SoC, it
> is possible to create output only gpios. This driver configures a special
> memory address, which when written to, outputs 16 bit to the latches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Ummm...

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

... but there are comments below that should be addressed before
merging.

Also this patch conflates a lot of changes that should be in
separate patches.  It's a lot easier to review discrete changes
instead of a bunch of stuff lumped together.  It's just a device
driver and the code is better after the patch so I'm not going to make
a big deal about it.

g.

> ---
> This patch is part of a series moving the mips/lantiq target to OF and clkdev
> support. The patch, once Acked, should go upstream via Ralf's MIPS tree.
> 
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c |  147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c
> index b91c7f1..9296801 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c
> @@ -3,16 +3,18 @@
>   *  under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published
>   *  by the Free Software Foundation.
>   *
> - *  Copyright (C) 2010 John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
> + *  Copyright (C) 2012 John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>

Why is include/gpio.h being dropped?  This file uses that header.
Depending on another include file using it isn't recommended.

> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  #include <lantiq_soc.h>
>  
> @@ -25,102 +27,131 @@
>  #define LTQ_EBU_BUSCON	0x1e7ff		/* 16 bit access, slowest timing */
>  #define LTQ_EBU_WP	0x80000000	/* write protect bit */
>  
> -/* we keep a shadow value of the last value written to the ebu */
> -static int ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow = 0x0;
> -static void __iomem *ltq_ebu_gpio_membase;
> +struct ltq_mm {
> +	struct of_mm_gpio_chip mmchip;
> +	u16 shadow;	/* shadow the latches state */
> +};
>  
> -static void ltq_ebu_apply(void)
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_apply - write the shadow value to the ebu address.

nit: Kerneldoc format should be:

/**
 * ltq_mm_apply() - write the shadow value to the ebu address.

See Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt

> + * @chip:     Pointer to our private data structure.
> + *
> + * Write the shadow value to the EBU to set the gpios. We need to set the
> + * global EBU lock to make sure that PCI/MTD dont break.
> + */
> +static void ltq_mm_apply(struct ltq_mm *chip)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  	ltq_ebu_w32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON, LTQ_EBU_BUSCON1);
> -	*((__u16 *)ltq_ebu_gpio_membase) = ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow;
> +	*((__u16 *)chip->mmchip.regs) = chip->shadow;

Nasty casting.

>  	ltq_ebu_w32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON | LTQ_EBU_WP, LTQ_EBU_BUSCON1);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> -static void ltq_ebu_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_set - gpio_chip->set - set gpios.
> + * @gc:     Pointer to gpio_chip device structure.
> + * @gpio:   GPIO signal number.
> + * @val:    Value to be written to specified signal.
> + *
> + * Set the shadow value and call ltq_mm_apply.
> + */
> +static void ltq_mm_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset, int value)
>  {
> +	struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
> +	struct ltq_mm *chip =
> +		container_of(mm_gc, struct ltq_mm, mmchip);
> +
>  	if (value)
> -		ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow |= (1 << offset);
> +		chip->shadow |= (1 << offset);
>  	else
> -		ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow &= ~(1 << offset);
> -	ltq_ebu_apply();
> +		chip->shadow &= ~(1 << offset);
> +	ltq_mm_apply(chip);
>  }
>  
> -static int ltq_ebu_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
> -	int value)
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_dir_out - gpio_chip->dir_out - set gpio direction.
> + * @gc:     Pointer to gpio_chip device structure.
> + * @gpio:   GPIO signal number.
> + * @val:    Value to be written to specified signal.
> + *
> + * Same as ltq_mm_set, always returns 0.
> + */
> +static int ltq_mm_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset, int value)
>  {
> -	ltq_ebu_set(chip, offset, value);
> +	ltq_mm_set(gc, offset, value);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct gpio_chip ltq_ebu_chip = {
> -	.label = "ltq_ebu",
> -	.direction_output = ltq_ebu_direction_output,
> -	.set = ltq_ebu_set,
> -	.base = 72,
> -	.ngpio = 16,
> -	.can_sleep = 1,
> -	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> -};
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_save_regs - Set initial values of GPIO pins
> + * @mm_gc: pointer to memory mapped GPIO chip structure
> + */
> +static void ltq_mm_save_regs(struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc)
> +{
> +	struct ltq_mm *chip =
> +		container_of(mm_gc, struct ltq_mm, mmchip);
> +
> +	/* tell the ebu controller which memory address we will be using */
> +	ltq_ebu_w32(CPHYSADDR(chip->mmchip.regs) | 0x1, LTQ_EBU_ADDRSEL1);
>  
> -static int ltq_ebu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +	ltq_mm_apply(chip);
> +}
> +
> +static int ltq_mm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> -	int ret = 0;
>  	struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	struct ltq_mm *chip;
> +	const __be32 *shadow;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (!res) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get memory resource\n");
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  
> -	res = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> -		resource_size(res), dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> -	if (!res) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request memory resource\n");
> -		return -EBUSY;
> -	}
> -
> -	ltq_ebu_gpio_membase = devm_ioremap_nocache(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> -		resource_size(res));
> -	if (!ltq_ebu_gpio_membase) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to ioremap mem region\n");
> +	chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!chip)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
>  
> -	/* grab the default shadow value passed form the platform code */
> -	ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow = (unsigned int) pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +	chip->mmchip.gc.ngpio = 16;
> +	chip->mmchip.gc.label = "gpio-mm-ltq";
> +	chip->mmchip.gc.direction_output = ltq_mm_dir_out;
> +	chip->mmchip.gc.set = ltq_mm_set;
> +	chip->mmchip.save_regs = ltq_mm_save_regs;
>  
> -	/* tell the ebu controller which memory address we will be using */
> -	ltq_ebu_w32(pdev->resource->start | 0x1, LTQ_EBU_ADDRSEL1);
> +	/* store the shadow value if one was passed by the devicetree */
> +	shadow = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,shadow", NULL);
> +	if (shadow)
> +		chip->shadow = *shadow;

Device tree properties are big-endian.  You'll need to use
be32_to_cpu() or of_property_read_u32().

>  
> -	/* write protect the region */
> -	ltq_ebu_w32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON | LTQ_EBU_WP, LTQ_EBU_BUSCON1);
> -
> -	ret = gpiochip_add(&ltq_ebu_chip);
> -	if (!ret)
> -		ltq_ebu_apply();
> +	ret = of_mm_gpiochip_add(pdev->dev.of_node, &chip->mmchip);
> +	if (ret)
> +		kfree(chip);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static struct platform_driver ltq_ebu_driver = {
> -	.probe = ltq_ebu_probe,
> +static const struct of_device_id ltq_mm_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "lantiq,gpio-mm" },
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ltq_mm_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver ltq_mm_driver = {
> +	.probe = ltq_mm_probe,
>  	.driver = {
> -		.name = "ltq_ebu",
> +		.name = "gpio-mm-ltq",
>  		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +		.of_match_table = ltq_mm_match,
>  	},
>  };
>  
> -static int __init ltq_ebu_init(void)
> +static int __init ltq_mm_init(void)
>  {
> -	int ret = platform_driver_register(&ltq_ebu_driver);
> -
> -	if (ret)
> -		pr_info("ltq_ebu : Error registering platfom driver!");
> -	return ret;
> +	return platform_driver_register(&ltq_mm_driver);
>  }
>  
> -postcore_initcall(ltq_ebu_init);
> +subsys_initcall(ltq_mm_init);

Why the change of initcall level?

g.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] GPIO: MIPS: lantiq: convert gpio-mm-lantiq to OF and of_mm_gpio
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:34:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517183459.9C9B83E0621@localhost> (raw)
Message-ID: <20120517183459.ggVuEwiH8tEqd36sSEVHyKDiLp5wvdtpGtJfOkNcx-0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337201394-11431-2-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org>

On Wed, 16 May 2012 22:49:53 +0200, John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> wrote:
> Implements OF support and convert to of_mm_gpio.
> 
> By attaching hardware latches to the External Bus Unit (EBU) on Lantiq SoC, it
> is possible to create output only gpios. This driver configures a special
> memory address, which when written to, outputs 16 bit to the latches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Ummm...

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

... but there are comments below that should be addressed before
merging.

Also this patch conflates a lot of changes that should be in
separate patches.  It's a lot easier to review discrete changes
instead of a bunch of stuff lumped together.  It's just a device
driver and the code is better after the patch so I'm not going to make
a big deal about it.

g.

> ---
> This patch is part of a series moving the mips/lantiq target to OF and clkdev
> support. The patch, once Acked, should go upstream via Ralf's MIPS tree.
> 
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c |  147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c
> index b91c7f1..9296801 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c
> @@ -3,16 +3,18 @@
>   *  under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published
>   *  by the Free Software Foundation.
>   *
> - *  Copyright (C) 2010 John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
> + *  Copyright (C) 2012 John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>

Why is include/gpio.h being dropped?  This file uses that header.
Depending on another include file using it isn't recommended.

> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  #include <lantiq_soc.h>
>  
> @@ -25,102 +27,131 @@
>  #define LTQ_EBU_BUSCON	0x1e7ff		/* 16 bit access, slowest timing */
>  #define LTQ_EBU_WP	0x80000000	/* write protect bit */
>  
> -/* we keep a shadow value of the last value written to the ebu */
> -static int ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow = 0x0;
> -static void __iomem *ltq_ebu_gpio_membase;
> +struct ltq_mm {
> +	struct of_mm_gpio_chip mmchip;
> +	u16 shadow;	/* shadow the latches state */
> +};
>  
> -static void ltq_ebu_apply(void)
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_apply - write the shadow value to the ebu address.

nit: Kerneldoc format should be:

/**
 * ltq_mm_apply() - write the shadow value to the ebu address.

See Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt

> + * @chip:     Pointer to our private data structure.
> + *
> + * Write the shadow value to the EBU to set the gpios. We need to set the
> + * global EBU lock to make sure that PCI/MTD dont break.
> + */
> +static void ltq_mm_apply(struct ltq_mm *chip)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  	ltq_ebu_w32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON, LTQ_EBU_BUSCON1);
> -	*((__u16 *)ltq_ebu_gpio_membase) = ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow;
> +	*((__u16 *)chip->mmchip.regs) = chip->shadow;

Nasty casting.

>  	ltq_ebu_w32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON | LTQ_EBU_WP, LTQ_EBU_BUSCON1);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> -static void ltq_ebu_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_set - gpio_chip->set - set gpios.
> + * @gc:     Pointer to gpio_chip device structure.
> + * @gpio:   GPIO signal number.
> + * @val:    Value to be written to specified signal.
> + *
> + * Set the shadow value and call ltq_mm_apply.
> + */
> +static void ltq_mm_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset, int value)
>  {
> +	struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
> +	struct ltq_mm *chip =
> +		container_of(mm_gc, struct ltq_mm, mmchip);
> +
>  	if (value)
> -		ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow |= (1 << offset);
> +		chip->shadow |= (1 << offset);
>  	else
> -		ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow &= ~(1 << offset);
> -	ltq_ebu_apply();
> +		chip->shadow &= ~(1 << offset);
> +	ltq_mm_apply(chip);
>  }
>  
> -static int ltq_ebu_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
> -	int value)
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_dir_out - gpio_chip->dir_out - set gpio direction.
> + * @gc:     Pointer to gpio_chip device structure.
> + * @gpio:   GPIO signal number.
> + * @val:    Value to be written to specified signal.
> + *
> + * Same as ltq_mm_set, always returns 0.
> + */
> +static int ltq_mm_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset, int value)
>  {
> -	ltq_ebu_set(chip, offset, value);
> +	ltq_mm_set(gc, offset, value);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct gpio_chip ltq_ebu_chip = {
> -	.label = "ltq_ebu",
> -	.direction_output = ltq_ebu_direction_output,
> -	.set = ltq_ebu_set,
> -	.base = 72,
> -	.ngpio = 16,
> -	.can_sleep = 1,
> -	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> -};
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_save_regs - Set initial values of GPIO pins
> + * @mm_gc: pointer to memory mapped GPIO chip structure
> + */
> +static void ltq_mm_save_regs(struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc)
> +{
> +	struct ltq_mm *chip =
> +		container_of(mm_gc, struct ltq_mm, mmchip);
> +
> +	/* tell the ebu controller which memory address we will be using */
> +	ltq_ebu_w32(CPHYSADDR(chip->mmchip.regs) | 0x1, LTQ_EBU_ADDRSEL1);
>  
> -static int ltq_ebu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +	ltq_mm_apply(chip);
> +}
> +
> +static int ltq_mm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> -	int ret = 0;
>  	struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	struct ltq_mm *chip;
> +	const __be32 *shadow;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (!res) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get memory resource\n");
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  
> -	res = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> -		resource_size(res), dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> -	if (!res) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request memory resource\n");
> -		return -EBUSY;
> -	}
> -
> -	ltq_ebu_gpio_membase = devm_ioremap_nocache(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> -		resource_size(res));
> -	if (!ltq_ebu_gpio_membase) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to ioremap mem region\n");
> +	chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!chip)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
>  
> -	/* grab the default shadow value passed form the platform code */
> -	ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow = (unsigned int) pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +	chip->mmchip.gc.ngpio = 16;
> +	chip->mmchip.gc.label = "gpio-mm-ltq";
> +	chip->mmchip.gc.direction_output = ltq_mm_dir_out;
> +	chip->mmchip.gc.set = ltq_mm_set;
> +	chip->mmchip.save_regs = ltq_mm_save_regs;
>  
> -	/* tell the ebu controller which memory address we will be using */
> -	ltq_ebu_w32(pdev->resource->start | 0x1, LTQ_EBU_ADDRSEL1);
> +	/* store the shadow value if one was passed by the devicetree */
> +	shadow = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,shadow", NULL);
> +	if (shadow)
> +		chip->shadow = *shadow;

Device tree properties are big-endian.  You'll need to use
be32_to_cpu() or of_property_read_u32().

>  
> -	/* write protect the region */
> -	ltq_ebu_w32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON | LTQ_EBU_WP, LTQ_EBU_BUSCON1);
> -
> -	ret = gpiochip_add(&ltq_ebu_chip);
> -	if (!ret)
> -		ltq_ebu_apply();
> +	ret = of_mm_gpiochip_add(pdev->dev.of_node, &chip->mmchip);
> +	if (ret)
> +		kfree(chip);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static struct platform_driver ltq_ebu_driver = {
> -	.probe = ltq_ebu_probe,
> +static const struct of_device_id ltq_mm_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "lantiq,gpio-mm" },
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ltq_mm_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver ltq_mm_driver = {
> +	.probe = ltq_mm_probe,
>  	.driver = {
> -		.name = "ltq_ebu",
> +		.name = "gpio-mm-ltq",
>  		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +		.of_match_table = ltq_mm_match,
>  	},
>  };
>  
> -static int __init ltq_ebu_init(void)
> +static int __init ltq_mm_init(void)
>  {
> -	int ret = platform_driver_register(&ltq_ebu_driver);
> -
> -	if (ret)
> -		pr_info("ltq_ebu : Error registering platfom driver!");
> -	return ret;
> +	return platform_driver_register(&ltq_mm_driver);
>  }
>  
> -postcore_initcall(ltq_ebu_init);
> +subsys_initcall(ltq_mm_init);

Why the change of initcall level?

g.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-17 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-16 20:49 [PATCH V3 1/3] GPIO: MIPS: lantiq: move gpio-stp and gpio-ebu to the subsystem folder John Crispin
2012-05-16 20:49 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] GPIO: MIPS: lantiq: convert gpio-mm-lantiq to OF and of_mm_gpio John Crispin
2012-05-17 18:34   ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-05-17 18:34     ` Grant Likely
2012-05-16 20:49 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] GPIO: MIPS: lantiq: convert gpio-stp-xway to OF John Crispin
2012-05-17 18:38   ` Grant Likely
2012-05-17 18:38     ` Grant Likely
2012-05-17 18:25 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] GPIO: MIPS: lantiq: move gpio-stp and gpio-ebu to the subsystem folder Grant Likely
2012-05-17 18:25   ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120517183459.9C9B83E0621@localhost \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=blogic@openwrt.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.