From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Cc: "lrg@ti.com" <lrg@ti.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: use correct device for device supply lookup
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 00:13:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120519231347.GD16590@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB80CEE.4050201@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1809 bytes --]
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 02:43:18AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> For mapping, the node should start from "regulators", not from pmu
> on this example.
What makes you say this? I'm really not even sure what it means.
How does a node "start" from something? Supply mappings are direct
links between consumers and regulators.
> Here my understanding is that config->of_node should contain the
> node information of the regulator being registered only. In DT case,
> it should not be null.
Right, but this is unrelated to what we're doing when the regulator is a
consumer. Then we just do the same thing as regulator_get(dev, name).
> >I still don't see any change needed here, from the above it simply looks
> >like the supplies aren't set up.
> Unfortunately,
> My regulator_get is failing if I dont correct the above logic to
> have proper config.of_node.
But this seems like it is unrelated to the patch we're discussing! Your
patch does nothing to config.of_node, it changes the device used to look
up the supply. To repeat yet again:
| context of the class device we create. I can't think of any situation
| where I'd expect that to make matters any better - the class device
| should certainly never appear in the device tree and isn't going to have
| a stable name for non-DT systems either.
*Please* engage with this, especially the non-DT part. You need to
explain how what you're saying is related to the patch you posted, you
keep talking about a "proper" config.of_node and saying this happens to
make your system work but this isn't visibily related to the patch you
posted.
What is not "proper" about the of_node that was supplied for the
regulator being registered? In what way is this related to the device
used by the regulator functioning as a consumer to request a supply?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-19 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-19 14:14 [PATCH] regulator: core: use correct device for device supply lookup Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 16:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 17:14 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 17:20 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 17:40 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 17:56 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 18:26 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 19:03 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 20:50 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 21:13 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 23:13 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-05-20 7:34 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-20 9:01 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <4FB8C9EF.7010400@nvidia.com>
2012-05-20 12:06 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-20 12:14 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-20 12:10 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 17:28 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120519231347.GD16590@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.