From: William Thompson <wt@electro-mechanical.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: raid 10f2 vs 1 on 2 drives
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:33:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120522193340.GM27769@electro-mechanical.com> (raw)
I understand that raid 10 f2 is slower on writes due to the location of the
2nd copy. My question is, if lots of writes are performed, could this
layout wearout the drives quicker than raid 1?
next reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-22 19:33 William Thompson [this message]
2012-05-22 22:36 ` raid 10f2 vs 1 on 2 drives David Brown
2012-05-23 11:25 ` William Thompson
2012-05-25 19:03 ` Bill Davidsen
2012-05-25 19:40 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-26 16:07 ` David Brown
2012-05-26 23:41 ` Bill Davidsen
2012-05-27 0:46 ` keld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120522193340.GM27769@electro-mechanical.com \
--to=wt@electro-mechanical.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.