From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mm: fix faulty initialization in vmalloc_init()
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:12:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120524151231.e3a18ac5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001c01cd3987$d1a71a50$74f54ef0$%cho@samsung.com>
On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:32:56 +0900
KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com> wrote:
> vmalloc_init() adds 'vmap_area's for early 'vm_struct's.
> This patch fixes vmalloc_init() to correctly initialize
> vmap_area for the given vm_struct.
>
<daily message>
Insufficient information. When fixing a bug please always always
always describe the user-visible effects of the bug. Does the kernel
instantly crash? Is it a comestic cleanliness thing which has no
effect? Something in between? I have simply no idea, and am dependent
upon you to tell me.
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1185,9 +1185,10 @@ void __init vmalloc_init(void)
> /* Import existing vmlist entries. */
> for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
> va = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vmap_area), GFP_NOWAIT);
> - va->flags = tmp->flags | VM_VM_AREA;
> + va->flags = VM_VM_AREA;
This change is a mystery. Why do we no longer transfer ->flags?
> va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr;
> va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size;
> + va->vm = tmp;
OK, I can see how this might be important. But why did you find it
necessary? Why was this change actually needed?
> __insert_vmap_area(va);
> }
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: mm: fix faulty initialization in vmalloc_init()
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:12:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120524151231.e3a18ac5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001c01cd3987$d1a71a50$74f54ef0$%cho@samsung.com>
On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:32:56 +0900
KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com> wrote:
> vmalloc_init() adds 'vmap_area's for early 'vm_struct's.
> This patch fixes vmalloc_init() to correctly initialize
> vmap_area for the given vm_struct.
>
<daily message>
Insufficient information. When fixing a bug please always always
always describe the user-visible effects of the bug. Does the kernel
instantly crash? Is it a comestic cleanliness thing which has no
effect? Something in between? I have simply no idea, and am dependent
upon you to tell me.
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1185,9 +1185,10 @@ void __init vmalloc_init(void)
> /* Import existing vmlist entries. */
> for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
> va = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vmap_area), GFP_NOWAIT);
> - va->flags = tmp->flags | VM_VM_AREA;
> + va->flags = VM_VM_AREA;
This change is a mystery. Why do we no longer transfer ->flags?
> va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr;
> va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size;
> + va->vm = tmp;
OK, I can see how this might be important. But why did you find it
necessary? Why was this change actually needed?
> __insert_vmap_area(va);
> }
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mm: fix faulty initialization in vmalloc_init()
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:12:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120524151231.e3a18ac5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001c01cd3987$d1a71a50$74f54ef0$%cho@samsung.com>
On Thu, 24 May 2012 17:32:56 +0900
KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com> wrote:
> vmalloc_init() adds 'vmap_area's for early 'vm_struct's.
> This patch fixes vmalloc_init() to correctly initialize
> vmap_area for the given vm_struct.
>
<daily message>
Insufficient information. When fixing a bug please always always
always describe the user-visible effects of the bug. Does the kernel
instantly crash? Is it a comestic cleanliness thing which has no
effect? Something in between? I have simply no idea, and am dependent
upon you to tell me.
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1185,9 +1185,10 @@ void __init vmalloc_init(void)
> /* Import existing vmlist entries. */
> for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
> va = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vmap_area), GFP_NOWAIT);
> - va->flags = tmp->flags | VM_VM_AREA;
> + va->flags = VM_VM_AREA;
This change is a mystery. Why do we no longer transfer ->flags?
> va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr;
> va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size;
> + va->vm = tmp;
OK, I can see how this might be important. But why did you find it
necessary? Why was this change actually needed?
> __insert_vmap_area(va);
> }
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-24 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-24 8:32 mm: fix faulty initialization in vmalloc_init() KyongHo
2012-05-24 8:32 ` KyongHo
2012-05-24 8:32 ` KyongHo
2012-05-24 8:32 ` KyongHo
2012-05-24 22:12 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-05-24 22:12 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-24 22:12 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-25 0:24 ` Olav Haugan
2012-05-25 0:24 ` Olav Haugan
2012-05-25 0:24 ` Olav Haugan
2012-05-25 11:12 ` KyongHo Cho
2012-05-25 11:12 ` KyongHo Cho
2012-05-25 12:39 ` KyongHo Cho
2012-05-25 12:39 ` KyongHo Cho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120524151231.e3a18ac5.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pullip.cho@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.