From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Joe Landman <joe.landman@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: very slow file deletion on an SSD
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 09:18:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120526231838.GR25351@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBF60D1.80104@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 06:37:05AM -0400, Joe Landman wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> Just ran into this (see posted output at bottom). 3.2.14 kernel,
> MD RAID 5, xfs file system. Not sure (precisely) where the problem
> is, hence posting to both lists.
>
> [root@siFlash ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md22 : active raid5 sdl[0] sds[7] sdx[6] sdu[5] sdk[4] sdz[3] sdw[2] sdr[1]
> 1641009216 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 32k chunk, algorithm 2
> [8/8] [UUUUUUUU]
>
> md20 : active raid5 sdh[0] sdf[7] sdm[6] sdd[5] sdc[4] sde[3] sdi[2] sdg[1]
> 1641009216 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 32k chunk, algorithm 2
> [8/8] [UUUUUUUU]
>
> md21 : active raid5 sdy[0] sdq[7] sdp[6] sdo[5] sdn[4] sdj[3] sdv[2] sdt[1]
> 1641009216 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 32k chunk, algorithm 2
> [8/8] [UUUUUUUU]
>
> md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
> 93775800 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU]
> bitmap: 1/1 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk
>
>
> md2* are SSD RAID5 arrays we are experimenting with. Xfs file
> systems atop them:
>
> [root@siFlash ~]# mount | grep md2
> /dev/md20 on /data/1 type xfs (rw)
> /dev/md21 on /data/2 type xfs (rw)
> /dev/md22 on /data/3 type xfs (rw)
>
> vanilla mount options (following Dave Chinner's long standing advice)
>
> meta-data=/dev/md20 isize=2048 agcount=32,
> agsize=12820392 blks
> = sectsz=512 attr=2
> data = bsize=4096 blocks=410252304, imaxpct=5
> = sunit=8 swidth=56 blks
> naming =version 2 bsize=65536 ascii-ci=0
> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=30720, version=2
> = sectsz=512 sunit=8 blks, lazy-count=1
> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
But you haven't followed my advice when it comes to using default
mkfs options, have you? You're running 2k inodes and 64k directory
block size, which is not exactly a common config
The question is, why do you have these options configured, and are
they responsible for things being slow?
> All this said, deletes from this unit are taking 1-2 seconds per file ...
Sounds like you might be hitting the synchronous xattr removal
problem that was recently fixed (as has been mentioned already), but
even so 2 IOs don't take 1-2s to do, unless the MD RAID5 barrier
implementation is really that bad. If you mount -o nobarrier, what
happens?
CHeers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-26 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-25 10:37 very slow file deletion on an SSD Joe Landman
2012-05-25 10:37 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-25 10:45 ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-25 10:45 ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-25 10:49 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-25 10:49 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-25 14:48 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-25 14:48 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-25 16:57 ` Ben Myers
2012-05-25 16:57 ` Ben Myers
2012-05-25 16:54 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-25 16:54 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-25 16:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-05-25 16:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-05-26 16:00 ` David Brown
2012-05-26 16:00 ` David Brown
2012-05-26 19:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-26 19:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-26 23:18 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-05-26 23:25 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-26 23:25 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-27 0:07 ` Dave Chinner
2012-05-27 0:07 ` Dave Chinner
2012-05-27 0:10 ` joe.landman
2012-05-27 0:10 ` joe.landman
2012-05-27 1:49 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-27 1:49 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-27 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-27 2:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-27 7:34 ` Stefan Ring
2012-05-27 13:15 ` Krzysztof Adamski
2012-05-27 13:15 ` Krzysztof Adamski
2012-05-27 14:59 ` joe.landman
2012-05-27 14:59 ` joe.landman
2012-05-27 16:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-27 16:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-27 17:14 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-27 17:14 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-27 19:24 ` Peter Grandi
2012-05-27 17:17 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-27 17:17 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-26 23:55 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-26 23:55 ` Joe Landman
2012-05-27 0:07 ` Jon Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120526231838.GR25351@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=joe.landman@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.