Re: very slow file deletion on an SSD

[Joe Landman <joe.landman@gmail.com>]

On 05/27/2012 12:07 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/27/12 9:59 AM, joe.landman@gmail.com wrote:
>> This is going to be a very fragmented file.  I am guessing that this
>> is the reason for the long duration delete.   I'll do some more
>> measurements before going to 3.4.x as per Eric's note.
>
> filefrag -v should also tell you how many fragments, and because it
> uses fiemap it probably won't run into the same problems.
>
> But it sounds like we can just assume very high fragmentation.
>

[root@siFlash test]# filefrag  1.r.48.0
1.r.48.0: 1364 extents found


> It's not addressing the exact issue, but why are the files so fragmented?
> Are they very hole-y or is it just an issue with how they are written?
> Perhaps preallocation would help you here?

Possibly.  We are testing the system using fio, and doing random reads 
and writes.  I'll see if we can do a preallocation scheme 
(before/during) for the files.

So to summarize, the delete performance will be (at least) in part a 
function of the fragmentation?  A directory full of massively fragmented 
files will take longer to delete than a directory of contiguous and 
larger extents?  And I did some experimentation using xfs_repair, and it 
seems to be the case there as well ... the higher level of 
fragmentation, the longer the repair seems to take.



>
> -Eric