[lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
@ 2012-06-03 17:50 geve001
  2012-06-03 23:16 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: geve001 @ 2012-06-03 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2477 bytes --]

On slackware, sensors produce a wrong value for CPU temperature for the MB
"Point of View ION-MB330-1"

 

It is off at least 20 degrees.

CPU-0 and CPU-1 differ 10 degrees which is odd. CPU-0 has more load and
lower temp (see mpstat)

Critical temperature should be 125 according to datasheets

 

Some Google topics suggest to add 20 degrees, but in those cases the cpu’s
have the same low temp.

 

==> How to tackle this problem??

 

------------- Linux kernel 2.6.37.6

root@atom:~# uname -a

Linux atom 2.6.37.6-smp #2 SMP Sat Apr 9 23:39:07 CDT 2011 i686 Intel(R)
Atom(TM) CPU  330   @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

 

 

------------- lm-sensors version 3.3.2

root@atom:/etc# sensors -v

sensors version 3.3.2 with libsensors version 3.3.2

 

 

------------- detect coretemp

root@atom:~# sensors-detect

# sensors-detect revision 6057 (2012-06-01 17:47:27 +0200)

# System: Point of View ION-MB330-1 [Ver. 1.0]

…

Intel digital thermal sensor...                             Success!

    (driver `coretemp')

…

Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.

Just press ENTER to continue:

 

Driver `coretemp':

  * Chip `Intel digital thermal sensor' (confidence: 9)

 

 

------------- sensor values

root@atom:~# sensors

coretemp-isa-0000

Adapter: ISA adapter

Core0:         +2.0°C  (crit = +90.0°C)

 

coretemp-isa-0001

Adapter: ISA adapter

Core1:        +12.0°C  (crit = +90.0°C)

 

------------ CPU load

root@atom:/usr/local/gvs_cron# mpstat  -P 0,1 3 3

Linux 2.6.37.6-smp (atom)       06/03/2012      _i686_  (2 CPU)

 

05:56:11 PM  CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal
%guest   %idle

05:56:14 PM    0    5.02    0.00    1.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
0.00   93.98

05:56:14 PM    1    0.33    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
0.00   99.67

05:56:17 PM    0    5.33    0.00    1.33    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
0.00   93.33

05:56:17 PM    1    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
0.00  100.00

05:56:20 PM    0    4.68    0.00    1.34    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
0.00   93.98

05:56:20 PM    1    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
0.00  100.00

Average:       0    5.01    0.00    1.22    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
0.00   93.76

Average:       1    0.11    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
0.00   99.89


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 11237 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
@ 2012-06-03 23:16 ` Guenter Roeck
  2012-06-04 16:46 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2012-06-03 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors
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^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
  2012-06-03 23:16 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2012-06-04 16:46 ` Guenter Roeck
  2012-06-04 19:23 ` Ger vermeulen
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2012-06-04 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 20:18 -0400, Ben Kamen wrote:
> I'm using a Supermicro X7SPA D510 and it's like 10'C different btween coretemp readings and what the IPMI reports for its CPU sensor...
> 
> For what it's worth, /proc/cpuinfo reads:
> 
> > processor       : 0
> > vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family      : 6
> > model           : 28
> > model name      : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D510   @ 1.66GHz
> > stepping        : 10
> > cpu MHz         : 1666.670
> > cache size      : 512 KB
> > physical id     : 0
> > siblings        : 4
> > core id         : 0
> > cpu cores       : 2
> > apicid          : 0
> > initial apicid  : 0
> > fpu             : yes
> > fpu_exception   : yes
> > cpuid level     : 10
> > wp              : yes
> > flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts ac                                 pi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmpe                                 rf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm dts
> > bogomips        : 3334.02
> > clflush size    : 64
> > cache_alignment : 64
> > address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> > power management:
> >
> > processor       : 1
> > vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family      : 6
> > model           : 28
> > model name      : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D510   @ 1.66GHz
> > stepping        : 10
> > cpu MHz         : 1666.670
> > cache size      : 512 KB
> > physical id     : 0
> > siblings        : 4
> > core id         : 1
> > cpu cores       : 2
> > apicid          : 2
> > initial apicid  : 2
> > fpu             : yes
> > fpu_exception   : yes
> > cpuid level     : 10
> > wp              : yes
> > flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts ac                                 pi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dt                                 es64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm dts
> > bogomips        : 3399.83
> > clflush size    : 64
> > cache_alignment : 64
> > address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> > power management:
> >
> > processor       : 2
> > vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family      : 6
> > model           : 28
> > model name      : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D510   @ 1.66GHz
> > stepping        : 10
> > cpu MHz         : 1666.670
> > cache size      : 512 KB
> > physical id     : 0
> > siblings        : 4
> > core id         : 0
> > cpu cores       : 2
> > apicid          : 1
> > initial apicid  : 1
> > fpu             : yes
> > fpu_exception   : yes
> > cpuid level     : 10
> > wp              : yes
> > flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts ac                                 pi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dt                                 es64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm dts
> > bogomips        : 3333.13
> > clflush size    : 64
> > cache_alignment : 64
> > address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> > power management:
> >
> > processor       : 3
> > vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family      : 6
> > model           : 28
> > model name      : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D510   @ 1.66GHz
> > stepping        : 10
> > cpu MHz         : 1666.670
> > cache size      : 512 KB
> > physical id     : 0
> > siblings        : 4
> > core id         : 1
> > cpu cores       : 2
> > apicid          : 3
> > initial apicid  : 3
> > fpu             : yes
> > fpu_exception   : yes
> > cpuid level     : 10
> > wp              : yes
> > flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts ac                                 pi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dt                                 es64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm dts
> > bogomips        : 3333.24
> > clflush size    : 64
> > cache_alignment : 64
> > address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> > power management:
> 
TjMax detection for Atom CPUs is at best marginal today. It should be
100 degrees C for your CPU, but is probably detected as 90.

I submitted an RFC patch a minute ago, trying to improve it. Maybe you
can give it a try.

Thanks,
Guenter



_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
  2012-06-03 23:16 ` Guenter Roeck
  2012-06-04 16:46 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2012-06-04 19:23 ` Ger vermeulen
  2012-06-04 20:51 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ger vermeulen @ 2012-06-04 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Added requested cpuinfo at the bottom

I also noticed a logging in the syslog "Unable to read TjMax from CPU",
Maybe gives a hint to reason.

root@atom:~# rmmod coretemp
root@atom:~# modprobe coretemp

Jun  4 21:06:48 atom kernel: [88459.638772] coretemp coretemp.0: Unable to
read TjMax from CPU.
Jun  4 21:06:48 atom kernel: [88459.640633] coretemp coretemp.1: Unable to
read TjMax from CPU.

root@atom:~# sensors
coretemp-isa-0000
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core0:         -1.0°C  (crit = +90.0°C)

coretemp-isa-0001
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core1:        +10.0°C  (crit = +90.0°C)

root@atom:~# cat /sys/devices/platform/coretemp.0/temp1_input
-1000
root@atom:~# cat /sys/devices/platform/coretemp.1/temp1_input
10000


root@atom:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 28
model name      : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU  330   @ 1.60GHz
stepping        : 2
cpu MHz         : 1599.991
cache size      : 512 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 2
apicid          : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc
arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3 cx16
xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm dts
bogomips        : 3199.98
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 32 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 28
model name      : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU  330   @ 1.60GHz
stepping        : 2
cpu MHz         : 1599.991
cache size      : 512 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
core id         : 1
cpu cores       : 2
apicid          : 2
initial apicid  : 2
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc
arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3 cx16
xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm dts
bogomips        : 3199.56
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 32 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:guenter.roeck@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Monday, 04 June, 2012 01:17
> To: geve002@casema.nl
> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces
> wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
> 
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 01:50:14PM -0400, geve001@casema.nl wrote:
> > On slackware, sensors produce a wrong value for CPU temperature for the
> MB
> > "Point of View ION-MB330-1"
> >
> >
> >
> > It is off at least 20 degrees.
> >
> > CPU-0 and CPU-1 differ 10 degrees which is odd. CPU-0 has more load and
> lower
> > temp (see mpstat)
> >
> > Critical temperature should be 125 according to datasheets
> >
> >
> >
> > Some Google topics suggest to add 20 degrees, but in those cases the
> cpu’s have
> > the same low temp.
> >
> >
> >
> > ==> How to tackle this problem??
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------- Linux kernel 2.6.37.6
> >
> > root@atom:~# uname -a
> >
> > Linux atom 2.6.37.6-smp #2 SMP Sat Apr 9 23:39:07 CDT 2011 i686 Intel(R)
> Atom
> > (TM) CPU  330   @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
> >
> >
> >
> Looks like the CPU does not provide a value for TjMax itself, and we don't
> detect
> the CPU type correctly to adjust it.
> 
> Can you provide the output of /proc/cpuinfo ?
> 
> As workaround, you can set the module parameter force_tjmax to 125.
> 
> Thanks,
> Guenter


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-04 19:23 ` Ger vermeulen
@ 2012-06-04 20:51 ` Guenter Roeck
  2012-06-05 19:10 ` Ger vermeulen
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2012-06-04 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors
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^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-04 20:51 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2012-06-05 19:10 ` Ger vermeulen
  2012-06-05 20:33 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ger vermeulen @ 2012-06-05 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:guenter.roeck@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Monday, 04 June, 2012 22:52
> To: geve002@casema.nl
> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> Subject: RE: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces
> wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
> 
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 15:23 -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:
> > Added requested cpuinfo at the bottom
> >
> Hi,
> 
> Please don't top-post.
> 
> > I also noticed a logging in the syslog "Unable to read TjMax from CPU",
> > Maybe gives a hint to reason.
> >
> > root@atom:~# rmmod coretemp
> > root@atom:~# modprobe coretemp
> >
> > Jun  4 21:06:48 atom kernel: [88459.638772] coretemp coretemp.0: Unable
> to
> > read TjMax from CPU.
> > Jun  4 21:06:48 atom kernel: [88459.640633] coretemp coretemp.1: Unable
> to
> > read TjMax from CPU.
> >
> This is "normal" for Atom CPUs.
> 
> > root@atom:~# sensors
> > coretemp-isa-0000
> > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > Core0:         -1.0°C  (crit = +90.0°C)
> >
> > coretemp-isa-0001
> > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > Core1:        +10.0°C  (crit = +90.0°C)
> >
> > root@atom:~# cat /sys/devices/platform/coretemp.0/temp1_input
> > -1000
> > root@atom:~# cat /sys/devices/platform/coretemp.1/temp1_input
> > 10000
> >
> Problem is that TjMax is not correctly detected. I submitted an RFC
> patch to see if we can improve on it. That won't be made available in
> your version of the kernel, though, so you would either have to import
> the coretemp module from a later version of the kernel, or use the
> workaround I suggested below. TjMax for the Atom 330 CPU is 125 degrees
> C, so the real temperatures are 34 degrees C and 45 degrees C.
> 
> I can not explain the differences in the reported temperatures vs. the
> work load. Maybe Core0 and Core1 are getting swapped somewhere. Overall,
> though, keep in mind that the reported temperatures are very unreliable
> for temperatures as far below TjMax as you experience in your system.
> 
> Guenter
> 
> > root@atom:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
> > processor       : 0
> > vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family      : 6
> > model           : 28
> > model name      : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU  330   @ 1.60GHz
> > stepping        : 2
> > cpu MHz         : 1599.991
> > cache size      : 512 KB
> > physical id     : 0
> > siblings        : 2
> > core id         : 0
> > cpu cores       : 2
> > apicid          : 0
> > initial apicid  : 0
> > fdiv_bug        : no
> > hlt_bug         : no
> > f00f_bug        : no
> > coma_bug        : no
> > fpu             : yes
> > fpu_exception   : yes
> > cpuid level     : 10
> > wp              : yes
> > flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca
> > cmov pat clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm
> constant_tsc
> > arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3
> cx16
> > xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm dts
> > bogomips        : 3199.98
> > clflush size    : 64
> > cache_alignment : 64
> > address sizes   : 32 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> > power management:
> >
> > processor       : 1
> > vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family      : 6
> > model           : 28
> > model name      : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU  330   @ 1.60GHz
> > stepping        : 2
> > cpu MHz         : 1599.991
> > cache size      : 512 KB
> > physical id     : 0
> > siblings        : 2
> > core id         : 1
> > cpu cores       : 2
> > apicid          : 2
> > initial apicid  : 2
> > fdiv_bug        : no
> > hlt_bug         : no
> > f00f_bug        : no
> > coma_bug        : no
> > fpu             : yes
> > fpu_exception   : yes
> > cpuid level     : 10
> > wp              : yes
> > flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca
> > cmov pat clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm
> constant_tsc
> > arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3
> cx16
> > xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm dts
> > bogomips        : 3199.56
> > clflush size    : 64
> > cache_alignment : 64
> > address sizes   : 32 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> > power management:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:guenter.roeck@ericsson.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, 04 June, 2012 01:17
> > > To: geve002@casema.nl
> > > Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> > > Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces
> > > wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 01:50:14PM -0400, geve001@casema.nl wrote:
> > > > On slackware, sensors produce a wrong value for CPU temperature for
> the
> > > MB
> > > > "Point of View ION-MB330-1"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It is off at least 20 degrees.
> > > >
> > > > CPU-0 and CPU-1 differ 10 degrees which is odd. CPU-0 has more load
> and
> > > lower
> > > > temp (see mpstat)
> > > >
> > > > Critical temperature should be 125 according to datasheets
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Some Google topics suggest to add 20 degrees, but in those cases the
> > > cpu’s have
> > > > the same low temp.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ==> How to tackle this problem??
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------- Linux kernel 2.6.37.6
> > > >
> > > > root@atom:~# uname -a
> > > >
> > > > Linux atom 2.6.37.6-smp #2 SMP Sat Apr 9 23:39:07 CDT 2011 i686
> Intel(R)
> > > Atom
> > > > (TM) CPU  330   @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Looks like the CPU does not provide a value for TjMax itself, and we
> don't
> > > detect
> > > the CPU type correctly to adjust it.
> > >
> > > Can you provide the output of /proc/cpuinfo ?
> > >
> > > As workaround, you can set the module parameter force_tjmax to 125.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Guenter
> >


The workaround you suggested to change the tjmax is not possible for my
coretemp.ko unknown symbol.

So a work around can be adding to /etc/sensors3.conf

chip "coretemp-isa-0000"
     label temp1 "Core0"
     compute temp1 @+35,@-35

chip "coretemp-isa-0001"
     label temp1 "Core1"
     compute temp1 @+35,@-35

Is this correct?

Thanks, Ger


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-05 19:10 ` Ger vermeulen
@ 2012-06-05 20:33 ` Guenter Roeck
  2012-06-05 21:05 ` Ger vermeulen
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2012-06-05 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 15:10 -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:

[ ... ]

> 
> The workaround you suggested to change the tjmax is not possible for my
> coretemp.ko unknown symbol.
> 
Not sure I understand. What command do you execute, and what exactly is
the output ?

> So a work around can be adding to /etc/sensors3.conf
> 
> chip "coretemp-isa-0000"
>      label temp1 "Core0"
>      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> 
> chip "coretemp-isa-0001"
>      label temp1 "Core1"
>      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> 
> Is this correct?
> 
It shows you the correct temperature. So, yes, it is one way to solve
the problem. Do you really need the "label" line ?

Thanks,
Guenter



_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-05 20:33 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2012-06-05 21:05 ` Ger vermeulen
  2012-06-05 21:21 ` Guenter Roeck
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ger vermeulen @ 2012-06-05 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors



> -----Original Message-----
> From: lm-sensors-bounces@lm-sensors.org [mailto:lm-sensors-bounces@lm-
> sensors.org] On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2012 22:34
> To: geve002@casema.nl
> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces
> wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
> 
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 15:10 -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> >
> > The workaround you suggested to change the tjmax is not possible for my
> > coretemp.ko unknown symbol.
> >
> Not sure I understand. What command do you execute, and what exactly is
> the output ?
> 
> > So a work around can be adding to /etc/sensors3.conf
> >
> > chip "coretemp-isa-0000"
> >      label temp1 "Core0"
> >      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> >
> > chip "coretemp-isa-0001"
> >      label temp1 "Core1"
> >      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> >
> > Is this correct?
> >
> It shows you the correct temperature. So, yes, it is one way to solve
> the problem. Do you really need the "label" line ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Guenter
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lm-sensors mailing list
> lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors



root@atom:~# insmod
/lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko tjmax=125
insmod: error inserting
'/lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko': -1 Unknown
symbol in module

The "label" line I copied from another example, not knowing what the exact
syntax should be. I assumed a kind of definition of the temp object.
Without the "label" line it works as well, so don't need it.

After removal of label it looks like this:

root@atom:/etc# sensors
coretemp-isa-0000
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core 0:       +38.0°C  (crit = +125.0°C)

coretemp-isa-0001
Adapter: ISA adapter
Core 1:       +49.0°C  (crit = +125.0°C)

Thanks, Ger


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-05 21:05 ` Ger vermeulen
@ 2012-06-05 21:21 ` Guenter Roeck
  2012-06-05 21:38 ` Ger vermeulen
  2012-06-05 21:42 ` Guenter Roeck
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2012-06-05 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:05:23PM -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lm-sensors-bounces@lm-sensors.org [mailto:lm-sensors-bounces@lm-
> > sensors.org] On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> > Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2012 22:34
> > To: geve002@casema.nl
> > Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> > Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces
> > wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
> > 
> > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 15:10 -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:
> > 
> > [ ... ]
> > 
> > >
> > > The workaround you suggested to change the tjmax is not possible for my
> > > coretemp.ko unknown symbol.
> > >
> > Not sure I understand. What command do you execute, and what exactly is
> > the output ?
> > 
> > > So a work around can be adding to /etc/sensors3.conf
> > >
> > > chip "coretemp-isa-0000"
> > >      label temp1 "Core0"
> > >      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> > >
> > > chip "coretemp-isa-0001"
> > >      label temp1 "Core1"
> > >      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> > >
> > > Is this correct?
> > >
> > It shows you the correct temperature. So, yes, it is one way to solve
> > the problem. Do you really need the "label" line ?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Guenter
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > lm-sensors mailing list
> > lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
> 
> 
> 
> root@atom:~# insmod
> /lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko tjmax\x125
> insmod: error inserting
> '/lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko': -1 Unknown
> symbol in module
> 
Try "modprobe coretemp force_tjmax\x125" instead.

Guenter


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-05 21:21 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2012-06-05 21:38 ` Ger vermeulen
  2012-06-05 21:42 ` Guenter Roeck
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ger vermeulen @ 2012-06-05 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors



> -----Original Message-----
> From: lm-sensors-bounces@lm-sensors.org [mailto:lm-sensors-bounces@lm-
> sensors.org] On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2012 23:22
> To: Ger vermeulen
> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces
> wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
> 
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:05:23PM -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: lm-sensors-bounces@lm-sensors.org [mailto:lm-sensors-bounces@lm-
> > > sensors.org] On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2012 22:34
> > > To: geve002@casema.nl
> > > Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> > > Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces
> > > wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 15:10 -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:
> > >
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The workaround you suggested to change the tjmax is not possible for
> my
> > > > coretemp.ko unknown symbol.
> > > >
> > > Not sure I understand. What command do you execute, and what exactly
> is
> > > the output ?
> > >
> > > > So a work around can be adding to /etc/sensors3.conf
> > > >
> > > > chip "coretemp-isa-0000"
> > > >      label temp1 "Core0"
> > > >      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> > > >
> > > > chip "coretemp-isa-0001"
> > > >      label temp1 "Core1"
> > > >      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> > > >
> > > > Is this correct?
> > > >
> > > It shows you the correct temperature. So, yes, it is one way to solve
> > > the problem. Do you really need the "label" line ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Guenter
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > lm-sensors mailing list
> > > lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
> >
> >
> >
> > root@atom:~# insmod
> > /lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko tjmax\x125
> > insmod: error inserting
> > '/lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko': -1 Unknown
> > symbol in module
> >
> Try "modprobe coretemp force_tjmax\x125" instead.
> 
> Guenter
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lm-sensors mailing list
> lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

root@atom:/etc# modprobe coretemp force_tjmax\x125
FATAL: Error inserting coretemp
(/lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Unknown symbol
in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)

Thanks, Ger


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
  2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-06-05 21:38 ` Ger vermeulen
@ 2012-06-05 21:42 ` Guenter Roeck
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2012-06-05 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:38:31PM -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lm-sensors-bounces@lm-sensors.org [mailto:lm-sensors-bounces@lm-
> > sensors.org] On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> > Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2012 23:22
> > To: Ger vermeulen
> > Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> > Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces
> > wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:05:23PM -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: lm-sensors-bounces@lm-sensors.org [mailto:lm-sensors-bounces@lm-
> > > > sensors.org] On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2012 22:34
> > > > To: geve002@casema.nl
> > > > Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces
> > > > wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 15:10 -0400, Ger vermeulen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [ ... ]
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The workaround you suggested to change the tjmax is not possible for
> > my
> > > > > coretemp.ko unknown symbol.
> > > > >
> > > > Not sure I understand. What command do you execute, and what exactly
> > is
> > > > the output ?
> > > >
> > > > > So a work around can be adding to /etc/sensors3.conf
> > > > >
> > > > > chip "coretemp-isa-0000"
> > > > >      label temp1 "Core0"
> > > > >      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> > > > >
> > > > > chip "coretemp-isa-0001"
> > > > >      label temp1 "Core1"
> > > > >      compute temp1 @+35,@-35
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this correct?
> > > > >
> > > > It shows you the correct temperature. So, yes, it is one way to solve
> > > > the problem. Do you really need the "label" line ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Guenter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > lm-sensors mailing list
> > > > lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> > > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > root@atom:~# insmod
> > > /lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko tjmax\x125
> > > insmod: error inserting
> > > '/lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko': -1 Unknown
> > > symbol in module
> > >
> > Try "modprobe coretemp force_tjmax\x125" instead.
> > 
> > Guenter
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > lm-sensors mailing list
> > lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
> 
> root@atom:/etc# modprobe coretemp force_tjmax\x125
> FATAL: Error inserting coretemp
> (/lib/modules/2.6.37.6-smp/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): Unknown symbol
> in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
> 
Sorry, I just noticed that the parameter was added in a later kernel version.

Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-05 21:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-03 17:50 [lm-sensors] System: "Point of View ION-MB330-1" produces wrong values with lm-sensors 3.3.2 geve001
2012-06-03 23:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-06-04 16:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-06-04 19:23 ` Ger vermeulen
2012-06-04 20:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-06-05 19:10 ` Ger vermeulen
2012-06-05 20:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-06-05 21:05 ` Ger vermeulen
2012-06-05 21:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-06-05 21:38 ` Ger vermeulen
2012-06-05 21:42 ` Guenter Roeck

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.