From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>
Cc: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch -resend] drbd: fix resync_dump_detail() output
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:31:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608123128.GA18293@elgon.mountain> (raw)
The tests here aren't correct. It should be doing a shift before doing
the bitwise AND. (bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES) is always false and
(bme->flags & BME_LOCKED) checks for BME_NO_WRITES instead of checking
for locked.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
I sent this to the drbd-user list in March, but never recieved a
response.
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
index 2959cdf..ffe1ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
@@ -187,8 +187,10 @@ static void resync_dump_detail(struct seq_file *seq, struct lc_element *e)
struct bm_extent *bme = lc_entry(e, struct bm_extent, lce);
seq_printf(seq, "%5d %s %s\n", bme->rs_left,
- bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES ? "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
- bme->flags & BME_LOCKED ? "LOCKED" : "------"
+ test_bit(BME_NO_WRITES, &bme->flags) ?
+ "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
+ test_bit(BME_LOCKED, &bme->flags) ?
+ "LOCKED" : "------"
);
}
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Subject: [Drbd-dev] [patch -resend] drbd: fix resync_dump_detail() output
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:31:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608123128.GA18293@elgon.mountain> (raw)
The tests here aren't correct. It should be doing a shift before doing
the bitwise AND. (bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES) is always false and
(bme->flags & BME_LOCKED) checks for BME_NO_WRITES instead of checking
for locked.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
I sent this to the drbd-user list in March, but never recieved a
response.
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
index 2959cdf..ffe1ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
@@ -187,8 +187,10 @@ static void resync_dump_detail(struct seq_file *seq, struct lc_element *e)
struct bm_extent *bme = lc_entry(e, struct bm_extent, lce);
seq_printf(seq, "%5d %s %s\n", bme->rs_left,
- bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES ? "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
- bme->flags & BME_LOCKED ? "LOCKED" : "------"
+ test_bit(BME_NO_WRITES, &bme->flags) ?
+ "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
+ test_bit(BME_LOCKED, &bme->flags) ?
+ "LOCKED" : "------"
);
}
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>
Cc: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch -resend] drbd: fix resync_dump_detail() output
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:31:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608123128.GA18293@elgon.mountain> (raw)
The tests here aren't correct. It should be doing a shift before doing
the bitwise AND. (bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES) is always false and
(bme->flags & BME_LOCKED) checks for BME_NO_WRITES instead of checking
for locked.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
I sent this to the drbd-user list in March, but never recieved a
response.
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
index 2959cdf..ffe1ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
@@ -187,8 +187,10 @@ static void resync_dump_detail(struct seq_file *seq, struct lc_element *e)
struct bm_extent *bme = lc_entry(e, struct bm_extent, lce);
seq_printf(seq, "%5d %s %s\n", bme->rs_left,
- bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES ? "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
- bme->flags & BME_LOCKED ? "LOCKED" : "------"
+ test_bit(BME_NO_WRITES, &bme->flags) ?
+ "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
+ test_bit(BME_LOCKED, &bme->flags) ?
+ "LOCKED" : "------"
);
}
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-08 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-08 12:31 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2012-06-08 12:31 ` [patch -resend] drbd: fix resync_dump_detail() output Dan Carpenter
2012-06-08 12:31 ` [Drbd-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2012-06-08 18:50 ` [DRBD-user] " Lars Ellenberg
2012-06-08 18:50 ` Lars Ellenberg
2012-06-08 18:50 ` [Drbd-dev] " Lars Ellenberg
2014-02-17 19:43 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-17 19:43 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-17 19:43 ` [Drbd-dev] " Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120608123128.GA18293@elgon.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=drbd-user@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.