From: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
PeterZijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page-writeback.c: fix update bandwidth time judgment error
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:54:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120610045300.GA29336@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120610043641.GA10355@localhost>
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:36:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>Wanpeng,
>
>Sorry this I won't take this: it don't really improve anything. Even
>with the changed test, the real intervals are still some random values
>above (and not far away from) 200ms.. We are saying about 200ms
>intervals just for convenience.
>
But some parts like:
__bdi_update_bandwidth which bdi_update_bandwidth will call:
if(elapsed < BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)
return;
or
global_update_bandwidth:
if(time_before(now, update_time + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
return;
You me just ignore this disunion ?
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>
>On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:20:05PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpneg Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Since bdi_update_bandwidth function should estimate write bandwidth at 200ms intervals,
>> so the time is bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL == jiffies, but
>> if use time_is_after_eq_jiffies intervals will be bdi->bw_time_stamp +
>> BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL + 1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
>> index c833bf0..099e225 100644
>> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
>> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
>> @@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static void bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>> unsigned long bdi_dirty,
>> unsigned long start_time)
>> {
>> - if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
>> + if (time_is_after_jiffies(bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
>> return;
>> spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
>> __bdi_update_bandwidth(bdi, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
PeterZijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page-writeback.c: fix update bandwidth time judgment error
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:54:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120610045300.GA29336@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120610043641.GA10355@localhost>
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:36:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>Wanpeng,
>
>Sorry this I won't take this: it don't really improve anything. Even
>with the changed test, the real intervals are still some random values
>above (and not far away from) 200ms.. We are saying about 200ms
>intervals just for convenience.
>
But some parts like:
__bdi_update_bandwidth which bdi_update_bandwidth will call:
if(elapsed < BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)
return;
or
global_update_bandwidth:
if(time_before(now, update_time + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
return;
You me just ignore this disunion ?
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>
>On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:20:05PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpneg Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Since bdi_update_bandwidth function should estimate write bandwidth at 200ms intervals,
>> so the time is bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL == jiffies, but
>> if use time_is_after_eq_jiffies intervals will be bdi->bw_time_stamp +
>> BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL + 1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
>> index c833bf0..099e225 100644
>> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
>> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
>> @@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static void bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>> unsigned long bdi_dirty,
>> unsigned long start_time)
>> {
>> - if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
>> + if (time_is_after_jiffies(bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
>> return;
>> spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
>> __bdi_update_bandwidth(bdi, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-10 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-10 4:20 [PATCH] page-writeback.c: fix update bandwidth time judgment error Wanpeng Li
2012-06-10 4:20 ` Wanpeng Li
2012-06-10 4:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-10 4:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-10 4:54 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2012-06-10 4:54 ` Wanpeng Li
2012-06-10 7:24 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-10 7:24 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-10 7:41 ` Wanpeng Li
2012-06-10 7:41 ` Wanpeng Li
2012-06-10 7:47 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-10 7:47 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120610045300.GA29336@kernel \
--to=liwp.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.