Re: [PATCH 0/4] i2c: tegra: Bug fixes, cleanups and M_NOSTART support

[Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1526 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:37:36PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2012 09:44 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >On 06/05/2012 07:09 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >>This patch series having the:
> >>- Handling of late register write due to Tegra PPSB design.
> >>- support for I2C_M_NOSTART
> >>- Use devm_* for all allocation.
> >The series,
> >
> >Acked-by: Stephen Warren<swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
> >
> >Note that patch 4 touches context adjacent to Prashant's "i2c: tegra:
> >Add clk_prepare/clk_unprepare" patch, which I hope to take through the
> >Tegra tree since it's a requirement for the Tegra common clock
> >conversion. I don't think this will cause any significant conflict, but
> >perhaps it's worth resolving it explicitly.

Is it really a requirement? Just wondering if it will cause problems, if
Prashant's patch goes in via I2C after arm-soc has been merged. I am
fine with simply acking the patch, though.

> >Wolfram, perhaps we should put these 4 patches and Prashan'ts into their
> >own topic branch so that you can merge it into the I2C tree, and I can
> >merge it into the Tegra tree too? Or, I can take everything through
> >Tegra if you want, and ack it.

Laxman's patches should really go via I2C, I think. Can't we just fix
the conflict in arm-soc?

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]