Re: [PATCH 00/10] perf, x86: Add northbridge counter support for AMD family 15h

[Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>]

On 20.06.12 11:38:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:29 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > Second, since nb perfctr are implemented the same way as core
> > counters, the same code would have been used. Thus multiple (two) x86
> > pmus (struct x86_pmu) would reside in parallel in the kernel. 
> 
> Well, no. The I take it the uncore counters are nb wide, thus you need
> special goo to make counter rotation work properly, x86_pmu is unsuited
> for that.

The code for nb and core counters is identical. There would be the
same nmi handler, same code to setup the event, same code to
start/stop cpus. The only difference are per-node msrs, even the msr
offset calculation is the same as for core counters on family 15h. It
would not make sense to duplicate all this code. And, as said, current
design does not fit to use x86_pmus in parallel or to easy reuse x86
functions. Separating nb counters would make the same sense as
implementing a separate pmu for fixed counters.

And wrt counter rotation, this only affects code to assign counters.
You don't need a separate pmu for this.

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center