All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	hpa@linux.intel.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:17:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621201728.GB4642@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQVECyRBie-kgBETmqxPaMx24kUt1W07qAqoGD4vNus5xQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello, Yinghai.

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:57:45PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> if it is that case, that change could fix other problem problem too.
> --- during the one free reserved.regions could double the array.

Yeah, that sounds much more attractive to me too.  Some comments on
the patch tho.

>  /**
>   * memblock_double_array - double the size of the memblock regions array
>   * @type: memblock type of the regions array being doubled
> @@ -216,7 +204,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_doub
>  
>  	/* Calculate new doubled size */
>  	old_size = type->max * sizeof(struct memblock_region);
> -	new_size = old_size << 1;
> +	new_size = PAGE_ALIGN(old_size << 1);

We definintely can use some comments explaining why we want page
alignment.  It's kinda subtle.

This is a bit confusing here because old_size is the proper size
without padding while new_size is page aligned size with possible
padding.  Maybe discerning {old|new}_alloc_size is clearer?  Also, I
think adding @new_cnt variable which is calculated together would make
the code easier to follow.  So, sth like,

	/* explain why page aligning is necessary */
	old_size = type->max * sizeof(struct memblock_region);
	old_alloc_size = PAGE_ALIGN(old_size);

	new_max = type->max << 1;
	new_size = new_max * sizeof(struct memblock_region);
	new_alloc_size = PAGE_ALIGN(new_size);

and use alloc_sizes for alloc/frees and sizes for everything else.

>  unsigned long __init free_low_memory_core_early(int nodeid)
>  {
>  	unsigned long count = 0;
> -	phys_addr_t start, end;
> +	phys_addr_t start, end, size;
>  	u64 i;
>  
> -	/* free reserved array temporarily so that it's treated as free area */
> -	memblock_free_reserved_regions();
> +	for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL)
> +		count += __free_memory_core(start, end);
>  
> -	for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL) {
> -		unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_UP(start);
> -		unsigned long end_pfn = min_t(unsigned long,
> -					      PFN_DOWN(end), max_low_pfn);
> -		if (start_pfn < end_pfn) {
> -			__free_pages_memory(start_pfn, end_pfn);
> -			count += end_pfn - start_pfn;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	/* free range that is used for reserved array if we allocate it */
> +	size = get_allocated_memblock_reserved_regions_info(&start);
> +	if (size)
> +		count += __free_memory_core(start, start + size);

I'm afraid this is too early.  We don't want the region to be unmapped
yet.  This should only happen after all memblock usages are finished
which I don't think is the case yet.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	hpa@linux.intel.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:17:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120621201728.GB4642@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQVECyRBie-kgBETmqxPaMx24kUt1W07qAqoGD4vNus5xQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello, Yinghai.

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:57:45PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> if it is that case, that change could fix other problem problem too.
> --- during the one free reserved.regions could double the array.

Yeah, that sounds much more attractive to me too.  Some comments on
the patch tho.

>  /**
>   * memblock_double_array - double the size of the memblock regions array
>   * @type: memblock type of the regions array being doubled
> @@ -216,7 +204,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_doub
>  
>  	/* Calculate new doubled size */
>  	old_size = type->max * sizeof(struct memblock_region);
> -	new_size = old_size << 1;
> +	new_size = PAGE_ALIGN(old_size << 1);

We definintely can use some comments explaining why we want page
alignment.  It's kinda subtle.

This is a bit confusing here because old_size is the proper size
without padding while new_size is page aligned size with possible
padding.  Maybe discerning {old|new}_alloc_size is clearer?  Also, I
think adding @new_cnt variable which is calculated together would make
the code easier to follow.  So, sth like,

	/* explain why page aligning is necessary */
	old_size = type->max * sizeof(struct memblock_region);
	old_alloc_size = PAGE_ALIGN(old_size);

	new_max = type->max << 1;
	new_size = new_max * sizeof(struct memblock_region);
	new_alloc_size = PAGE_ALIGN(new_size);

and use alloc_sizes for alloc/frees and sizes for everything else.

>  unsigned long __init free_low_memory_core_early(int nodeid)
>  {
>  	unsigned long count = 0;
> -	phys_addr_t start, end;
> +	phys_addr_t start, end, size;
>  	u64 i;
>  
> -	/* free reserved array temporarily so that it's treated as free area */
> -	memblock_free_reserved_regions();
> +	for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL)
> +		count += __free_memory_core(start, end);
>  
> -	for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL) {
> -		unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_UP(start);
> -		unsigned long end_pfn = min_t(unsigned long,
> -					      PFN_DOWN(end), max_low_pfn);
> -		if (start_pfn < end_pfn) {
> -			__free_pages_memory(start_pfn, end_pfn);
> -			count += end_pfn - start_pfn;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	/* free range that is used for reserved array if we allocate it */
> +	size = get_allocated_memblock_reserved_regions_info(&start);
> +	if (size)
> +		count += __free_memory_core(start, start + size);

I'm afraid this is too early.  We don't want the region to be unmapped
yet.  This should only happen after all memblock usages are finished
which I don't think is the case yet.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-13 21:38 Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory Sasha Levin
2012-06-14  3:20 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-14  3:20   ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-14  9:50   ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-14  9:50     ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-14 20:56     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-14 20:56       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-14 21:34       ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-14 21:34         ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-14 23:57         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-14 23:57           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-15  0:59           ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-15  0:59             ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-15  2:21             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-15  2:21               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-15  7:41               ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-15  7:41                 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-18 22:32     ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-18 22:32       ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-18 22:50       ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-18 22:50         ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-19  4:11         ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-19  4:11           ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-19  5:43           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-19  5:43             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-19  6:09             ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-19  6:09               ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-19 18:12               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-19 18:12                 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-19 21:20           ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 21:20             ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 21:26             ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 21:26               ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-20  2:57               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21 20:17                 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-06-21 20:17                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-22  1:47                   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-22  1:58                     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-22 18:51                     ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-22 18:51                       ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-22 19:23                       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-22 19:23                         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-22 19:29                         ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-22 19:29                           ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-22 20:01                           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-22 20:01                             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-22 20:14                             ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-22 20:14                               ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-22 20:23                               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-22 20:23                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-23  2:14                           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-27 18:13                             ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-27 18:13                               ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-27 19:22                               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-27 19:22                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-27 19:26                                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-27 19:26                                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-27 21:15                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-29 18:27                                     ` [PATCH for -3.5] memblock: free allocated memblock_reserved_regions later Yinghai Lu
2012-06-29 18:27                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-29 18:32                                       ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-29 18:32                                         ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-29 18:38                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-29 18:38                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21 20:19             ` Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory Tejun Heo
2012-06-21 20:19               ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-22 10:29               ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-22 10:29                 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-22 18:15                 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-22 18:15                   ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120621201728.GB4642@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.