From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Shubhrajyoti Datta <omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
tony@atomide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:52:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712125229.GG2194@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM=Q2ct0PUisYGcaX6EAPWT-SmZAgRV_O8mAOodH-V4Q0O-Vww@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1354 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:17:07PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com> wrote:
> > This is a minimal cleanup series.
>
> If there are no further comments can this series be queued?
I just applied a few of them. BTW I get a build warning when compiling the
kernel, maybe someone is interested. It is not related to the patches, though.
===
WARNING: arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o(.data+0x2b5c0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable rx51_si4713_dev to the (unknown reference) .init.data:(unknown)
The variable rx51_si4713_dev references
the (unknown reference) __initdata (unknown)
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console
===
I think this is what I'll pull in for the next merge window. The big OMAP
cleanup (latest version from 3. July) would then go in early into -next for
3.7. Is that OK with the omap-people?
Also, thanks to Shubhrajyoti Datta for reviewing other patches on the
i2c-list, much appreciated.
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:52:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712125229.GG2194@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM=Q2ct0PUisYGcaX6EAPWT-SmZAgRV_O8mAOodH-V4Q0O-Vww@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:17:07PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com> wrote:
> > This is a minimal cleanup series.
>
> If there are no further comments can this series be queued?
I just applied a few of them. BTW I get a build warning when compiling the
kernel, maybe someone is interested. It is not related to the patches, though.
===
WARNING: arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o(.data+0x2b5c0): Section mismatch in reference from the variable rx51_si4713_dev to the (unknown reference) .init.data:(unknown)
The variable rx51_si4713_dev references
the (unknown reference) __initdata (unknown)
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console
===
I think this is what I'll pull in for the next merge window. The big OMAP
cleanup (latest version from 3. July) would then go in early into -next for
3.7. Is that OK with the omap-people?
Also, thanks to Shubhrajyoti Datta for reviewing other patches on the
i2c-list, much appreciated.
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120712/7065ea3b/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-28 15:11 [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 1/6] i2c: omap: Optimise the remove code Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-2-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 12:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 12:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-13 11:21 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-13 11:21 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 2/6] i2c: omap: Use SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-07-12 12:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 12:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 3/6] i2c: omap: Do not initialise the completion everytime Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-4-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-28 16:03 ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
2012-06-28 16:03 ` ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
[not found] ` <CAAe_U6Jtoj3mixvp+vqNmkr-RC28AfNqZ0syEE5voEr+Odv3zg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-29 1:34 ` Zhang, Shijie
2012-06-29 1:34 ` Zhang, Shijie
2012-07-12 12:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 12:19 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120712121928.GC2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-13 11:05 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-13 11:05 ` Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 4/6] i2c: omap: Remove the definition of SYSS_RESETDONE_MASK Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-5-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 12:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 12:20 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120712122053.GD2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-13 11:05 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-13 11:05 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 6/6] i2c: omap: Recover from Bus Busy condition Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-7-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 12:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 12:22 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120712122208.GF2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-13 11:04 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-13 11:04 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCHv11 5/6] i2c: omap: Correct I2C revision for OMAP3 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-28 15:11 ` Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1340896292-12112-6-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-12 12:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 12:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-13 11:04 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-13 11:04 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-09 11:47 ` [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-07-09 11:47 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-07-12 12:52 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-07-12 12:52 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120712125229.GG2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-13 11:25 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-07-13 11:25 ` Shubhrajyoti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120712125229.GG2194@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com \
--cc=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.