From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujtisu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -mm] memcg: prevent from OOM with too many dirty pages
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:13:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712141343.e1cb7776.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120712070501.GB21013@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:05:01 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> When we are back to the patch. Is it going into 3.5? I hope so and I
> think it is really worth stable as well. Andrew?
What patch. "memcg: prevent OOM with too many dirty pages"?
I wasn't planning on 3.5, given the way it's been churning around. How
about we put it into 3.6 and tag it for a -stable backport, so it gets
a bit of a run in mainline before we inflict it upon -stable users?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujtisu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -mm] memcg: prevent from OOM with too many dirty pages
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:13:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712141343.e1cb7776.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120712070501.GB21013@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:05:01 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> When we are back to the patch. Is it going into 3.5? I hope so and I
> think it is really worth stable as well. Andrew?
What patch. "memcg: prevent OOM with too many dirty pages"?
I wasn't planning on 3.5, given the way it's been churning around. How
about we put it into 3.6 and tag it for a -stable backport, so it gets
a bit of a run in mainline before we inflict it upon -stable users?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-19 14:50 [PATCH -mm] memcg: prevent from OOM with too many dirty pages Michal Hocko
2012-06-19 14:50 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-19 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-19 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-20 8:27 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-20 8:27 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-20 9:20 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 9:20 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-20 9:55 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-20 9:55 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-20 9:59 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-20 9:59 ` Michal Hocko
2012-06-20 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 " Michal Hocko
2012-06-20 10:11 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12 1:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-12 1:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-12 2:21 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-12 2:21 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-12 3:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-12 3:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-12 7:05 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12 7:05 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-12 21:13 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-07-12 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-12 22:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-12 22:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-13 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-13 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-16 8:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-16 8:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-16 8:35 ` [PATCH mmotm] memcg: further prevent " Hugh Dickins
2012-07-16 8:35 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-16 9:26 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-16 9:26 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-17 4:52 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-17 4:52 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-17 6:33 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-17 6:33 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-16 21:08 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-16 21:08 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-16 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 -mm] memcg: prevent from " Hugh Dickins
2012-07-16 8:10 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-16 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-16 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120712141343.e1cb7776.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujtisu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.