From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] hfsplus: stop using write_supers and s_dirt
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:09:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712160951.74cbb3c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342103191-17406-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:26:27 +0300
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew, here is v3 of the patches, could you please pick them instead of the
> ones you have in your tree?
I really do dislike dropping patches and replacing them. For a whole
bunch of reasons. One of which is that a wholesale replacement
requires a full re-review. Another is that wholesale replacement makes
it hard to see what was changed.
> The differences to v2 are:
>
> 1. checkpatch.pl warnings fixed
> 2. removed 'cancel_delayed_work()' from 'hfsplus_sync_fs()' because it is not
> enough to just cancel the job, we need to set the work_queued flag to zero
> as well. I could do this, but it is simpler to just remove this tiny
> optimization - we do not gain much with it. I caught this bug while doing
> some more testing.
And lo, when I look at "what was changed", I see that this patchset
actually does *not* remove the cancel_delayed_work() call. What's up
with that?
This latest patchset is identical to the code which is presently in -mm.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-12 14:26 [PATCHv3 0/4] hfsplus: stop using write_supers and s_dirt Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] hfsplus: make hfsplus_sync_fs static Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] hfsplus: amend debugging print Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] hfsplus: remove useless check Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] hfsplus: get rid of write_super Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 23:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-07-12 23:17 ` [PATCHv3 0/4] hfsplus: stop using write_supers and s_dirt Andrew Morton
2012-07-13 5:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120712160951.74cbb3c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.