* Runtime updates to EFI secure variables
@ 2012-07-13 17:12 James Bottomley
2012-07-13 18:02 ` Matthew Garrett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2012-07-13 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-efi; +Cc: linux-kernel
I finally managed to get runtime updates to the key databases and the
platform keys to work on the Tianocore UEFI emulator. The code is in
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/efitools.git
And a description of how to use the tools is here:
http://blog.hansenpartnership.com/updating-pk-kek-db-and-dbx-in-user-mode/
This means (provided we have access to the relevant keys) we can move
the platform into and out of Setup Mode as well as add signing and other
keys.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Runtime updates to EFI secure variables
2012-07-13 17:12 Runtime updates to EFI secure variables James Bottomley
@ 2012-07-13 18:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2012-07-13 18:26 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2012-07-13 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-efi, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 06:12:26PM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> This means (provided we have access to the relevant keys) we can move
> the platform into and out of Setup Mode as well as add signing and other
> keys.
I'm pretty sure that the expected behaviour is to use
EFI_VARIABLE_APPEND_WRITE for these updates, which means you don't need
to worry about the timestamp.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Runtime updates to EFI secure variables
2012-07-13 18:02 ` Matthew Garrett
@ 2012-07-13 18:26 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2012-07-13 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Garrett; +Cc: linux-efi, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 19:02 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 06:12:26PM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > This means (provided we have access to the relevant keys) we can move
> > the platform into and out of Setup Mode as well as add signing and other
> > keys.
>
> I'm pretty sure that the expected behaviour is to use
> EFI_VARIABLE_APPEND_WRITE for these updates, which means you don't need
> to worry about the timestamp.
Actually, as long as the timestamp is current (as in > previous
timstamp) it updates the private timestamp stored with the variable.
It's minor, and you're right, the timestamp could be zero, but it's best
practice.
As far as moving the platform into setup mode, that can only be done by
clearing PK, which has to be a non append write, so I need to worry
about both modes. It's useful to make sure this works, just in case we
run into some OEM accidentally forgetting to allow a user present reset
to setup mode, because it allows us to create an EFI program for them
that will have the same effect.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-13 18:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-13 17:12 Runtime updates to EFI secure variables James Bottomley
2012-07-13 18:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2012-07-13 18:26 ` James Bottomley
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.