From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, lenb@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:23:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120716152337.GA13540@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50001325.8010500@linaro.org>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 02:23:01PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/13/2012 02:17 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:03:45PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> Remove the power field as it is not used.
> >>
> > It looks to be used in drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c.
> >
> > I could emulate some value and stick it in there.. but I am
> > more curious - what is the intent of this value?
>
> At the first glance, this value is the power consumption of the
> specified state. I am not sure all acpi returns a correct value.
Like in milliwatts?
>
> I can imagine the power should be copied to the cpuidle_state structure
> to the power field where it is used by the governor to choose the better
> C-state. As it is not specified, cpuidle will assume the C-State N
> consumes less than the C-State N-1.
>
> If we want to add the power consumption we should also set the
> 'power_specified' flag for the driver, but that could change the
> behavior of the cpuidle driver.
>
> Anyway, IMO, this field is useless for this structure and should be
> specified later, if that makes sense, directly in the cpuidle_state
> structure like the other drivers do.
>
> If nobody complains, I will remove the field also from Xen and resend
> this patch.
Go for it. Looking at the Xen hypervisor code it just assigns the value
to its own structure and does nothing to it.
>
> Thanks
> -- Daniel
>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 --
> >> include/acpi/processor.h | 1 -
> >> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> >> index d044588..99ba58f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> >> @@ -485,8 +485,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_power_info_cst(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> >> if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> - cx.power = obj->integer.value;
> >> -
> >> current_count++;
> >> memcpy(&(pr->power.states[current_count]), &cx, sizeof(cx));
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
> >> index 0957457..87bb9d7 100644
> >> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
> >> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
> >> @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ struct acpi_processor_cx {
> >> u32 address;
> >> u8 entry_method;
> >> u32 latency;
> >> - u32 power;
> >> u64 time;
> >> u8 bm_sts_skip;
> >> char desc[ACPI_CX_DESC_LEN];
> >> --
> >> 1.7.5.4
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-16 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-12 21:03 [PATCH 1/5] acpi : remove latency_ticks from acpi_processor_cx structure Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-12 21:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] acpi : remove index " Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-12 21:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-12 21:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-13 18:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-17 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-17 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-12 21:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] acpi : remove usage " Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-12 21:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-17 20:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-12 21:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] acpi : remove power " Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-12 21:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-13 0:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-13 7:36 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-13 12:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-13 18:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-16 15:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-07-12 21:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] acpi : remove time " Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-12 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-17 20:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-12 21:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] acpi : remove latency_ticks " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-17 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-12 15:29 Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-12 15:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] acpi : remove power " Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120716152337.GA13540@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.