* AutoNUMA benchmark 0.1
@ 2012-07-16 20:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Arcangeli @ 2012-07-16 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-numa, Petr Holasek
Cc: Hillf Danton, Dan Smith, Peter Zijlstra, Linus Torvalds,
Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Paul Turner,
Suresh Siddha, Mike Galbraith, Paul E. McKenney, Lai Jiangshan,
Bharata B Rao, Lee Schermerhorn, Rik van Riel, Johannes Weiner,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Christoph Lameter, Alex Shi,
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello everyone,
With the collaboration of Petr Holasek we released a first 0.1 version
of the AutoNUMA benchmark.
It's now trivial to run it without the chance of mistakes, and you can
also see how fast the NUMA algorithms in the kernel converge the load
by checking the pdf charts it creates after each benchmark completes.
This benchmark can also setup hard/inverse bindings to benchmark the
hardware and measure the best/worst case (when run with hard bindings
no memory migration will ever happen and it starts computing in the
ideal memory layout, so it'll always be slightly faster than the
non-hard binding case).
To run it you just need numactl, gnuplot and gcc installed. After
cloning this git repo:
git clone git://gitorious.org/autonuma-benchmark/autonuma-benchmark.git
you can simply run it as root (or with sudo prefix):
./start_bench.sh -A
The above command will run all tests including the hard/inverse binds
(which require root privileges).
The first objective of this benchmark is to be able to track
regression in AutoNUMA, but it's also useful to to compare the results
of this benchmark on upstream, tip.git, and aa.git with AutoNUMA
enabled.
If you're only going to compare different NUMA placement algorithms in
different kernels, you can skip the inverse/hard bind tests to speed
up the benchmarking effort (the hard/invers bind tests should result
always the same). To skip the hard/inverse bind tests you can run it
like this:
./start_bench.sh -s -t
For a basic and quick benchmark, you can run it without parameters:
./start_bench.sh
If you encounter any problem or if you're interested to contribute
please CC Petr too.
Thanks,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* AutoNUMA benchmark 0.1
@ 2012-07-16 20:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Arcangeli @ 2012-07-16 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-numa, Petr Holasek
Cc: Hillf Danton, Dan Smith, Peter Zijlstra, Linus Torvalds,
Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Paul Turner,
Suresh Siddha, Mike Galbraith, Paul E. McKenney, Lai Jiangshan,
Bharata B Rao, Lee Schermerhorn, Rik van Riel, Johannes Weiner,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Christoph Lameter, Alex Shi,
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Don Morris,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Hello everyone,
With the collaboration of Petr Holasek we released a first 0.1 version
of the AutoNUMA benchmark.
It's now trivial to run it without the chance of mistakes, and you can
also see how fast the NUMA algorithms in the kernel converge the load
by checking the pdf charts it creates after each benchmark completes.
This benchmark can also setup hard/inverse bindings to benchmark the
hardware and measure the best/worst case (when run with hard bindings
no memory migration will ever happen and it starts computing in the
ideal memory layout, so it'll always be slightly faster than the
non-hard binding case).
To run it you just need numactl, gnuplot and gcc installed. After
cloning this git repo:
git clone git://gitorious.org/autonuma-benchmark/autonuma-benchmark.git
you can simply run it as root (or with sudo prefix):
./start_bench.sh -A
The above command will run all tests including the hard/inverse binds
(which require root privileges).
The first objective of this benchmark is to be able to track
regression in AutoNUMA, but it's also useful to to compare the results
of this benchmark on upstream, tip.git, and aa.git with AutoNUMA
enabled.
If you're only going to compare different NUMA placement algorithms in
different kernels, you can skip the inverse/hard bind tests to speed
up the benchmarking effort (the hard/invers bind tests should result
always the same). To skip the hard/inverse bind tests you can run it
like this:
./start_bench.sh -s -t
For a basic and quick benchmark, you can run it without parameters:
./start_bench.sh
If you encounter any problem or if you're interested to contribute
please CC Petr too.
Thanks,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* AutoNUMA benchmark 0.1
@ 2012-07-16 20:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Arcangeli @ 2012-07-16 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-numa, Petr Holasek
Cc: Hillf Danton, Dan Smith, Peter Zijlstra, Linus Torvalds,
Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Paul Turner,
Suresh Siddha, Mike Galbraith, Paul E. McKenney, Lai Jiangshan,
Bharata B Rao, Lee Schermerhorn, Rik van Riel, Johannes Weiner,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Christoph Lameter, Alex Shi,
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Don Morris,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Hello everyone,
With the collaboration of Petr Holasek we released a first 0.1 version
of the AutoNUMA benchmark.
It's now trivial to run it without the chance of mistakes, and you can
also see how fast the NUMA algorithms in the kernel converge the load
by checking the pdf charts it creates after each benchmark completes.
This benchmark can also setup hard/inverse bindings to benchmark the
hardware and measure the best/worst case (when run with hard bindings
no memory migration will ever happen and it starts computing in the
ideal memory layout, so it'll always be slightly faster than the
non-hard binding case).
To run it you just need numactl, gnuplot and gcc installed. After
cloning this git repo:
git clone git://gitorious.org/autonuma-benchmark/autonuma-benchmark.git
you can simply run it as root (or with sudo prefix):
./start_bench.sh -A
The above command will run all tests including the hard/inverse binds
(which require root privileges).
The first objective of this benchmark is to be able to track
regression in AutoNUMA, but it's also useful to to compare the results
of this benchmark on upstream, tip.git, and aa.git with AutoNUMA
enabled.
If you're only going to compare different NUMA placement algorithms in
different kernels, you can skip the inverse/hard bind tests to speed
up the benchmarking effort (the hard/invers bind tests should result
always the same). To skip the hard/inverse bind tests you can run it
like this:
./start_bench.sh -s -t
For a basic and quick benchmark, you can run it without parameters:
./start_bench.sh
If you encounter any problem or if you're interested to contribute
please CC Petr too.
Thanks,
Andrea
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-16 20:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-16 20:00 AutoNUMA benchmark 0.1 Andrea Arcangeli
2012-07-16 20:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-07-16 20:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.