All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
Cc: "Shawn Guo" <shawn.guo-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Detlev Zundel" <dzu-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>,
	"Dong Aisheng" <b29396-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	"Fabio Estevam"
	<fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	"Linux ARM kernel"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Stefano Babic" <sbabic-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König"
	<u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Wolfgang Denk" <wd-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>,
	"Wolfram Sang" <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: MXS i2c PIOQ/DMA mode selection via DT
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:38:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207181438.54721.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201207161605.44379.marek.vasut-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

> Hello,
> 
> There's been this patch going on, which adds DMA mode into MXS i2c driver:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1174051/
> 
> Recent nitpick was about toggling the PIOQUEUE (almost like PIO, only
> transfer mode in current implementation) vs. DMA mode (newly added) on a
> per-bus basis.
> 
> Current implementation in the patch adds a DT property, "fsl,use-pio"
> (shall be changed to "fsl,use-pioqueue", but that's irrelevant) to select
> between the PIOQUEUE and DMA mode on per-bus basis.
> 
> There was now a suggestion to dump this property and use kernel module
> parameter instead. This obviously disallows to configure this behavior on
> per-bus basis. Consider a scenario where small transfers happens on one
> bus (possibly from a sensor) and large transfers on the other bus (eg. i2c
> EEPROM). In such scenario, it's beneficial to enable PIOQUEUE mode for the
> sensor and DMA mode for the EEPROM to minimize the overall overhead.
> 
> The mixed mode (PIOQ for small data and DMA for large data transfers) isn't
> supported yet.
> 
> Please advise.
> 
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut

BUMP?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: MXS i2c PIOQ/DMA mode selection via DT
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:38:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207181438.54721.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201207161605.44379.marek.vasut@gmail.com>

> Hello,
> 
> There's been this patch going on, which adds DMA mode into MXS i2c driver:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1174051/
> 
> Recent nitpick was about toggling the PIOQUEUE (almost like PIO, only
> transfer mode in current implementation) vs. DMA mode (newly added) on a
> per-bus basis.
> 
> Current implementation in the patch adds a DT property, "fsl,use-pio"
> (shall be changed to "fsl,use-pioqueue", but that's irrelevant) to select
> between the PIOQUEUE and DMA mode on per-bus basis.
> 
> There was now a suggestion to dump this property and use kernel module
> parameter instead. This obviously disallows to configure this behavior on
> per-bus basis. Consider a scenario where small transfers happens on one
> bus (possibly from a sensor) and large transfers on the other bus (eg. i2c
> EEPROM). In such scenario, it's beneficial to enable PIOQUEUE mode for the
> sensor and DMA mode for the EEPROM to minimize the overall overhead.
> 
> The mixed mode (PIOQ for small data and DMA for large data transfers) isn't
> supported yet.
> 
> Please advise.
> 
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut

BUMP?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-18 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-16 14:05 MXS i2c PIOQ/DMA mode selection via DT Marek Vasut
2012-07-16 14:05 ` Marek Vasut
     [not found] ` <201207161605.44379.marek.vasut-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-18 12:38   ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-07-18 12:38     ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201207181438.54721.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --to=marek.vasut-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=b29396-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dzu-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sbabic-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wd-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.