All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: konrad.wilk@oracle.com (Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:35:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120801143551.GI7227@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343381305.6812.116.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
> > > original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
> > 
> > So why can't the code be changed to use that? Is it that
> > the _set_bit, _clear_bit, etc are not available with !CONFIG_SMP?
> 
> _set_bit etc are not SMP safe if !CONFIG_SMP. But under Xen you might be
> communicating with a completely external entity who might be on another
> CPU (e.g. two uniprocessor guests communicating via event channels and
> grant tables). So we need a variant of the bit ops which are SMP safe
> even on a UP kernel.
> 
> The users are common code and the sync_foo vs foo distinction matters on
> some platforms (e.g. x86 where a UP kernel would omit the LOCK prefix
> for the normal ones).

OK, that makes sense. Stefano can you include that comment in the git
commit description and in the sync_bitops.h file please?
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h |   17 +++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..d975092903
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > > +#ifndef __ASM_SYNC_BITOPS_H__
> > > +#define __ASM_SYNC_BITOPS_H__
> > > +
> > > +#include <asm/bitops.h>
> > > +#include <asm/system.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define sync_set_bit(nr, p)		_set_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_clear_bit(nr, p)		_clear_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_change_bit(nr, p)		_change_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_and_set_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_set_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_bit(nr, addr)		test_bit(nr, addr)
> > > +#define sync_cmpxchg			cmpxchg
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > -- 
> > > 1.7.2.5
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel at lists.xen.org
> > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:35:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120801143551.GI7227@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343381305.6812.116.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
> > > original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
> > 
> > So why can't the code be changed to use that? Is it that
> > the _set_bit, _clear_bit, etc are not available with !CONFIG_SMP?
> 
> _set_bit etc are not SMP safe if !CONFIG_SMP. But under Xen you might be
> communicating with a completely external entity who might be on another
> CPU (e.g. two uniprocessor guests communicating via event channels and
> grant tables). So we need a variant of the bit ops which are SMP safe
> even on a UP kernel.
> 
> The users are common code and the sync_foo vs foo distinction matters on
> some platforms (e.g. x86 where a UP kernel would omit the LOCK prefix
> for the normal ones).

OK, that makes sense. Stefano can you include that comment in the git
commit description and in the sync_bitops.h file please?
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h |   17 +++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..d975092903
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > > +#ifndef __ASM_SYNC_BITOPS_H__
> > > +#define __ASM_SYNC_BITOPS_H__
> > > +
> > > +#include <asm/bitops.h>
> > > +#include <asm/system.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define sync_set_bit(nr, p)		_set_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_clear_bit(nr, p)		_clear_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_change_bit(nr, p)		_change_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_and_set_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_set_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_bit(nr, addr)		test_bit(nr, addr)
> > > +#define sync_cmpxchg			cmpxchg
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > -- 
> > > 1.7.2.5
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "xen-devel-GuqFBffKawuULHF6PoxzQEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org"
	<xen-devel-GuqFBffKawuULHF6PoxzQEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>,
	"linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org"
	<linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org>,
	"arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org"
	<arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
	"catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org"
	<catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim-LM2mM/qkH7s@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:35:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120801143551.GI7227@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343381305.6812.116.camel-o4Be2W7LfRlXesXXhkcM7miJhflN2719@public.gmane.org>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:37 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:33:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > sync_bitops functions are equivalent to the SMP implementation of the
> > > original functions, independently from CONFIG_SMP being defined.
> > 
> > So why can't the code be changed to use that? Is it that
> > the _set_bit, _clear_bit, etc are not available with !CONFIG_SMP?
> 
> _set_bit etc are not SMP safe if !CONFIG_SMP. But under Xen you might be
> communicating with a completely external entity who might be on another
> CPU (e.g. two uniprocessor guests communicating via event channels and
> grant tables). So we need a variant of the bit ops which are SMP safe
> even on a UP kernel.
> 
> The users are common code and the sync_foo vs foo distinction matters on
> some platforms (e.g. x86 where a UP kernel would omit the LOCK prefix
> for the normal ones).

OK, that makes sense. Stefano can you include that comment in the git
commit description and in the sync_bitops.h file please?
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini-mvvWK6WmYclDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h |   17 +++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..d975092903
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/sync_bitops.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > > +#ifndef __ASM_SYNC_BITOPS_H__
> > > +#define __ASM_SYNC_BITOPS_H__
> > > +
> > > +#include <asm/bitops.h>
> > > +#include <asm/system.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define sync_set_bit(nr, p)		_set_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_clear_bit(nr, p)		_clear_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_change_bit(nr, p)		_change_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_and_set_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_set_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_clear_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)	_test_and_change_bit(nr, p)
> > > +#define sync_test_bit(nr, addr)		test_bit(nr, addr)
> > > +#define sync_cmpxchg			cmpxchg
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > -- 
> > > 1.7.2.5
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel-GuqFBffKawuEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org
> > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-01 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 251+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-26 15:33 [PATCH 00/24] Introduce Xen support on ARM Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 01/24] arm: initial Xen support Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 16:30   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-26 16:30     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-27 11:56     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 11:56       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 10:42       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 10:42         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-06 10:55         ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-06 10:55           ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-06 10:55           ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 18:27   ` Rob Herring
2012-08-01 18:27     ` Rob Herring
2012-08-02  7:35     ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-02  7:35       ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-02  7:35       ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-02 14:13       ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-02 14:13         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-02 14:13         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-06 10:46         ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-06 10:46           ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 02/24] xen/arm: hypercalls Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 16:33   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-26 16:33     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-27  9:17     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27  9:17       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 13:02       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 13:02         ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 13:02         ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 13:18         ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 13:18           ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 13:41           ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 13:41             ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 14:21         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-27 14:21           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-27 14:21           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-27 14:36           ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 14:36             ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 14:39           ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 14:39             ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 14:59             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-27 14:59               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-26 16:56   ` David Vrabel
2012-07-26 16:56     ` David Vrabel
2012-07-26 17:19     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 17:19       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 17:19       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27  9:00     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27  9:00       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-26 19:19   ` Christopher Covington
2012-07-26 19:19     ` Christopher Covington
2012-07-27  9:19     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27  9:19       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 12:56       ` Christopher Covington
2012-07-27 12:56         ` Christopher Covington
2012-07-27 13:57         ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 13:57           ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 03/24] xen/arm: page.h definitions Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 16:36   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-26 16:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-27 13:47     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 13:47       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 13:47       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 04/24] xen/arm: sync_bitops Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 16:37   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-26 16:37     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-27  9:28     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27  9:28       ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-01 14:35       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-08-01 14:35         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:35         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 16:07         ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 16:07           ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 16:07           ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 05/24] xen/arm: empty implementation of grant_table arch specific functions Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:16   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:16     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 15:46     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 15:46       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 15:46       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 06/24] xen: missing includes Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27  6:57   ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-07-27  6:57     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-27  6:57     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-27 16:47     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 16:47       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 07/24] xen/arm: Xen detection and shared_info page mapping Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27  9:36   ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27  9:36     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 14:48     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 14:48       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 14:51       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 14:51         ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-01 14:19   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:19     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 15:45     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 15:45       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 08/24] xen/arm: Introduce xen_pfn_t for pfn and mfn types Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:22   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:22     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:22     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 15:50     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 15:50       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 09/24] xen/arm: compile and run xenbus Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:28   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:28     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:28     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-06 11:17     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-06 11:17       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 10/24] xen: do not compile manage, balloon, pci, acpi and cpu_hotplug on ARM Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27  7:01   ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-07-27  7:01     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-27  7:01     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-27 16:51     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 16:51       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 11/24] xen/arm: introduce CONFIG_XEN " Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:34   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:34     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 12/24] xen/arm: Introduce xen_guest_init Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27  9:42   ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27  9:42     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 15:54     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 15:54       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 16:11       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 16:11         ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 16:11         ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-01 14:38   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:38     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 13/24] xen/arm: get privilege status Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27  9:44   ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27  9:44     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 14:25     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 14:25       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 14:33       ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 14:33         ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-01 14:39         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:39           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:39           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 16:21           ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 16:21             ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 14/24] xen/arm: initialize grant_table on ARM Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:40   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:40     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 17:08     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 17:08       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 17:08       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 15/24] xen/arm: receive Xen events " Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:44   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:44     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:44     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-06 10:31     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-06 10:31       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 16/24] xen/arm: implement alloc/free_xenballooned_pages with alloc_pages/kfree Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33 ` [PATCH 17/24] xen: allow privcmd for HVM guests Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:33   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27  7:04   ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-07-27  7:04     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-27  7:04     ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-27 14:10     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 14:10       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 14:10       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:47       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:47         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:47         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-26 15:34 ` [PATCH 18/24] xen/arm: compile blkfront and blkback Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27  9:48   ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27  9:48     ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-27 16:25     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 16:25       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-27 16:25       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:48   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:48     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:48     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 16:19     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 16:19       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34 ` [PATCH 19/24] xen/arm: compile netback Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34 ` [PATCH 20/24] xen: update xen_add_to_physmap interface Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:52   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:52     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 16:18     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 16:18       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 18:19     ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-08-01 18:19       ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-08-01 18:19       ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-07-26 15:34 ` [PATCH 21/24] arm/v2m: initialize arch_timers even if v2m_timer is not present Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:52   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:52     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:52     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 16:06     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 16:06       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 16:06       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34 ` [PATCH 22/24] ARM: enable earlyprintk=xen Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34 ` [PATCH 23/24] hvc_xen: allow dom0_write_console for HVM guests Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:54   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:54     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 16:04     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 16:04       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 16:04       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34 ` [PATCH 24/24] [HACK] xen/arm: implement xen_remap_domain_mfn_range Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-26 15:34   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 14:56   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:56     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 14:56     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120801143551.GI7227@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.