From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:15:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120802161556.GA25572@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501A7AD3.7000008@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:04:19PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 01:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> #define DEFINE_HASH_TABLE(name, length) struct hash_table name = { .count = length, .buckets = { [0 ... (length - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
> > The limitation of this approach is that the struct hash_table variable must be 'static', which is a bit limiting - see for example the use of hashtable in 'struct user_namespace'.
> >
>
> What if we just use two possible decelerations? One of static structs and one for regular ones.
>
> struct hash_table {
> size_t bits;
> struct hlist_head buckets[];
> };
>
> #define DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) \
> union { \
> struct hash_table name; \
> struct { \
> size_t bits; \
This shouldn't use "bits", since it'll get expanded to the macro
argument.
> struct hlist_head buckets[1 << bits]; \
> } __name; \
__##name
> }
>
> #define DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(name, bit) \
> static struct hash_table name = { .bits = bit, \
> .buckets = { [0 ... (bit - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
You probably wanted to change that to [0 ... ((1 << bit) - 1)] , to
match DEFINE_HASHTABLE.
Since your definition of DEFINE_HASHTABLE would also work fine when used
statically, why not just always use that?
#define DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(name, bits) static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) = { .name.bits = bits }
One downside: you can't use this to define a global non-static hash
table, because you can't have a global non-static anonymous union.
Using the non-union form would actually allow a global non-static hash
table:
#define DEFINE_HASHTABLE_INIT(name, bits) struct hash_table name = { .bits = bits, .buckets = { [0 ... ((1 << bits) - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
/* elsewhere */
extern struct hash_table name;
I don't know if that seems like a good idea or not.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:15:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120802161556.GA25572@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501A7AD3.7000008@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:04:19PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 01:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> #define DEFINE_HASH_TABLE(name, length) struct hash_table name = { .count = length, .buckets = { [0 ... (length - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
> > The limitation of this approach is that the struct hash_table variable must be 'static', which is a bit limiting - see for example the use of hashtable in 'struct user_namespace'.
> >
>
> What if we just use two possible decelerations? One of static structs and one for regular ones.
>
> struct hash_table {
> size_t bits;
> struct hlist_head buckets[];
> };
>
> #define DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) \
> union { \
> struct hash_table name; \
> struct { \
> size_t bits; \
This shouldn't use "bits", since it'll get expanded to the macro
argument.
> struct hlist_head buckets[1 << bits]; \
> } __name; \
__##name
> }
>
> #define DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(name, bit) \
> static struct hash_table name = { .bits = bit, \
> .buckets = { [0 ... (bit - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
You probably wanted to change that to [0 ... ((1 << bit) - 1)] , to
match DEFINE_HASHTABLE.
Since your definition of DEFINE_HASHTABLE would also work fine when used
statically, why not just always use that?
#define DEFINE_STATIC_HASHTABLE(name, bits) static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(name, bits) = { .name.bits = bits }
One downside: you can't use this to define a global non-static hash
table, because you can't have a global non-static anonymous union.
Using the non-union form would actually allow a global non-static hash
table:
#define DEFINE_HASHTABLE_INIT(name, bits) struct hash_table name = { .bits = bits, .buckets = { [0 ... ((1 << bits) - 1)] = HLIST_HEAD_INIT } }
/* elsewhere */
extern struct hash_table name;
I don't know if that seems like a good idea or not.
- Josh Triplett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-02 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-31 18:05 [RFC 0/4] generic hashtable implementation Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-31 18:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-31 20:31 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 20:31 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:19 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:19 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 18:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 18:24 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:24 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 19:06 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 19:06 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 20:24 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 20:24 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 22:41 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 22:41 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-01 22:45 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-01 22:45 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-02 10:00 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 10:00 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 10:32 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 10:32 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 11:23 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 11:23 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 13:04 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 13:04 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 16:15 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-08-02 16:15 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 16:48 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 16:48 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 17:44 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 17:44 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 17:54 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 17:54 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 20:41 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 20:41 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 21:47 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 21:47 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-03 17:59 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-03 17:59 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 16:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-02 16:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-02 16:34 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 16:34 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-02 16:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-02 16:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-02 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 17:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-02 17:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-02 17:59 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 17:59 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 20:25 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 20:25 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 21:21 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 21:21 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-02 9:35 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-02 9:35 ` Josh Triplett
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 2/4] user_ns: use new hashtable implementation Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 3/4] mm,ksm: " Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` [RFC 4/4] workqueue: " Sasha Levin
2012-07-31 18:05 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120802161556.GA25572@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.