From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] ARM: rpc: Fix building RiscPC
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:03:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208101103.58808.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120809074754.GP18957@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thursday 09 August 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:27:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ARMv3 support was removed in 357c9c1f07 "ARM: Remove support for ARMv3
> > ARM610 and ARM710 CPUs", which explicitly left parts of the CPU32v3
> > support in place for building RiscPC. However, this does not actually
> > build in my test setup.
> >
> > This is probably not the right solution, but maybe someone has a better
> > idea for how to deal with this.
>
> This isn't the right solution. The RiscPC bus does not support half-word
> load/stores, so we must continue to build that target for the 32v3
> architecture (which is why I carefully left that stuff behind.)
>
> The mistake is in what I did with arch/arm/lib - the armv3 code in there
> needs to be resurected instead.
Ok, I'll drop my patch from the series then and wait for you to
fix this properly.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] ARM: rpc: Fix building RiscPC
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:03:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208101103.58808.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120809074754.GP18957@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thursday 09 August 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:27:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ARMv3 support was removed in 357c9c1f07 "ARM: Remove support for ARMv3
> > ARM610 and ARM710 CPUs", which explicitly left parts of the CPU32v3
> > support in place for building RiscPC. However, this does not actually
> > build in my test setup.
> >
> > This is probably not the right solution, but maybe someone has a better
> > idea for how to deal with this.
>
> This isn't the right solution. The RiscPC bus does not support half-word
> load/stores, so we must continue to build that target for the 32v3
> architecture (which is why I carefully left that stuff behind.)
>
> The mistake is in what I did with arch/arm/lib - the armv3 code in there
> needs to be resurected instead.
Ok, I'll drop my patch from the series then and wait for you to
fix this properly.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-10 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-08 21:27 [PATCH 00/10] ARM: interesting warnings from defconfig builds Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 01/10] ARM: footbridge: nw_gpio_lock is raw_spin_lock Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 02/10] ARM: ks8695: __arch_virt_to_dma type handling Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 03/10] ARM: mv78xx0: fix win_cfg_base prototype Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-13 14:59 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-08-13 14:59 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 04/10] ARM: pass -marm to gcc by default Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-09 21:12 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-08-09 21:12 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-08-09 21:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-09 21:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-09 21:22 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-08-09 21:22 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-08-10 9:59 ` Dave Martin
2012-08-10 9:59 ` Dave Martin
2012-08-10 11:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-10 11:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] asm-generic: xor: mark static functions as __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] ARM: davinci: don't use broken ntosd2_init_i2c Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-09 8:00 ` [PATCH v2 " Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-09 8:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-09 18:23 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-08-09 18:23 ` Sekhar Nori
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 07/10] ARM: rpc: check device_register return code in ecard_probe Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 08/10] ARM: s3c24xx: enable CONFIG_BUG for tct_hammer Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-10 6:07 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-08-10 6:07 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 09/10] ARM: rpc: Fix building RiscPC Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-09 7:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-09 7:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-10 11:03 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-08-10 11:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-13 10:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-13 10:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-08 21:27 ` [PATCH 10/10] leds: renesas: fix error handling Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-08 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-09 6:15 ` Bryan Wu
2012-08-09 6:15 ` Bryan Wu
2012-08-09 7:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-09 7:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201208101103.58808.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.