All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison o
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:29:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208111229.35167.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120811095951.GA8534@localhost>

On Saturday 11 August 2012 11:59:51 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:49:47AM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 August 2012 10:44:04 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Hi Christian,
> > > 
> > > FYI, there are new compile warnings show up in
> > 
> > Thanks for telling me. Are these "normal" gcc's warnings
> > for PPC? Because the usual C=2 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
> > doesn't show anything (on a x86 no cross-compile).
> 
> Yes, I don't use any special flags.
> 
> > > tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git master
> > > head:   0eba6e668abe4e0760d9d5e20921cc6000a77a85
> > > commit: 9bc63816be9bf504414d350e605a4b30f857907d [68/100] p54: parse output power table
> > > config: powerpc-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> > > 
> > > All error/warnings:
> > > 
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c: In function 'p54_get_maxpower':
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:292:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:293:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:294:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > 
> > interesting, rawpower is declared as u16.
> > whereas le16_to_cpu returns a __u16. 
> > (is that all, or is there something I don't see?)
> > 
> > Anyway, since you are currently the only person
> > I know, would you mind telling me if either (or
> > both?) of those patches has/have an effect?
> > 
> > patch 1: make rawpower __u16
> 
> Thanks for the quick fix! It works (build log follows).
> 
> wfg@bee ~/tip/obj-compiletest% make drivers/net/wireless/p54/
> /usr/bin/make -j40 -C source O=/home/wfg/tip/obj-compiletest ARCH=powerpc 
> CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/local/gcc-4.6.3-nolibc/powerpc64-linux/bin/powerpc64-linux- -j32 
> drivers/net/wireless/p54/
OT: why is there a "-j40" (after make) and "-j32" (after CROSS_COMPILE)
in the command line? Isn't one -jXY enough anymore?

>   CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.o
[...]
>   LD [M]  drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.o
> make: Leaving directory `/c/wfg/tip'
> wfg@bee ~/tip/obj-compiletest% ..
> wfg@bee ~/tip% q pop
> Removing patch patches/mutt-wfg-t420-1000-8534-5234451332105763812
> Restoring drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c
> 
Is this patch 1, or patch 2... or both?

Regards,
	Chr

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:29:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208111229.35167.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120811095951.GA8534@localhost>

On Saturday 11 August 2012 11:59:51 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:49:47AM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 August 2012 10:44:04 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Hi Christian,
> > > 
> > > FYI, there are new compile warnings show up in
> > 
> > Thanks for telling me. Are these "normal" gcc's warnings
> > for PPC? Because the usual C=2 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
> > doesn't show anything (on a x86 no cross-compile).
> 
> Yes, I don't use any special flags.
> 
> > > tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git master
> > > head:   0eba6e668abe4e0760d9d5e20921cc6000a77a85
> > > commit: 9bc63816be9bf504414d350e605a4b30f857907d [68/100] p54: parse output power table
> > > config: powerpc-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> > > 
> > > All error/warnings:
> > > 
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c: In function 'p54_get_maxpower':
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:292:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:293:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:294:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > 
> > interesting, rawpower is declared as u16.
> > whereas le16_to_cpu returns a __u16. 
> > (is that all, or is there something I don't see?)
> > 
> > Anyway, since you are currently the only person
> > I know, would you mind telling me if either (or
> > both?) of those patches has/have an effect?
> > 
> > patch 1: make rawpower __u16
> 
> Thanks for the quick fix! It works (build log follows).
> 
> wfg@bee ~/tip/obj-compiletest% make drivers/net/wireless/p54/
> /usr/bin/make -j40 -C source O=/home/wfg/tip/obj-compiletest ARCH=powerpc 
> CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/local/gcc-4.6.3-nolibc/powerpc64-linux/bin/powerpc64-linux- -j32 
> drivers/net/wireless/p54/
OT: why is there a "-j40" (after make) and "-j32" (after CROSS_COMPILE)
in the command line? Isn't one -jXY enough anymore?

>   CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.o
[...]
>   LD [M]  drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.o
> make: Leaving directory `/c/wfg/tip'
> wfg@bee ~/tip/obj-compiletest% ..
> wfg@bee ~/tip% q pop
> Removing patch patches/mutt-wfg-t420-1000-8534-5234451332105763812
> Restoring drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c
> 
Is this patch 1, or patch 2... or both?

Regards,
	Chr

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-11 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-11  8:44 [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Fengguang Wu
2012-08-11  9:49 ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison o Christian Lamparter
2012-08-11  9:49   ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Christian Lamparter
2012-08-11  9:59   ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison o Fengguang Wu
2012-08-11  9:59     ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Fengguang Wu
2012-08-11 10:29     ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2012-08-11 10:29       ` Christian Lamparter
2012-08-11 10:41       ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison o Fengguang Wu
2012-08-11 10:41         ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Fengguang Wu
2012-08-11 10:57         ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison o Christian Lamparter
2012-08-11 10:57           ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Christian Lamparter
2012-08-11 11:05           ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison o Fengguang Wu
2012-08-11 11:05             ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Fengguang Wu
2012-08-11 11:09           ` [PATCH] p54: fix powerpc gcc warnings Christian Lamparter
2012-08-11 11:09             ` Christian Lamparter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201208111229.35167.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
    --to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.