From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:34:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120814153413.GA18601@localhost> (raw)
Sorry I have no compilers for build testing these changes, however the
risk looks low and it's much better than to leave the arch broken,
considering that Eric will do atomic64_t in the core fs/namespace.c code.
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
Andrew: the arch maintainers have been CCed. Best is the maintainers
respond, test and perhaps take the corresponding change. Let's see how
this will work out..
arch/c6x/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/score/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/unicore32/Kconfig | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- linux.orig/arch/c6x/Kconfig 2012-06-14 22:29:58.187502107 +0800
+++ linux/arch/c6x/Kconfig 2012-08-14 23:23:18.147838692 +0800
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ config C6X
select OF
select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
+ select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
config MMU
def_bool n
--- linux.orig/arch/score/Kconfig 2012-06-14 22:29:58.219502109 +0800
+++ linux/arch/score/Kconfig 2012-08-14 23:23:37.691839156 +0800
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config SCORE
select ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
+ select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
choice
prompt "System type"
--- linux.orig/arch/unicore32/Kconfig 2012-07-25 19:09:37.671358715 +0800
+++ linux/arch/unicore32/Kconfig 2012-08-14 23:23:52.351839505 +0800
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config UNICORE32
select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
select GENERIC_IOMAP
+ select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
help
UniCore-32 is 32-bit Instruction Set Architecture,
including a series of low-power-consumption RISC chip
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-14 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-14 15:34 Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-08-14 16:22 ` [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs Mark Salter
2012-08-15 2:30 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 2:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 13:42 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 14:12 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 14:19 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 5:42 ` guanxuetao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120814153413.GA18601@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a-jacquiot@ti.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.