From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:12:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120815141233.GA32389@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345038181.2750.20.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:42:58AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 10:36 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > -#define L1_CACHE_BYTES L2_CACHE_BYTES
> > > +#define L1_CACHE_SHIFT L2_CACHE_SHIFT
> > > +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L2_CACHE_SHIFT)
> >
> > Nitpick: the last line could better be:
> >
> > +#define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> Yes, I noticed that after sending the patch.
>
> Should I push this through the c6x tree?
That'd be good. For consistency, will you also include the
GENERIC_ATOMIC64 chunk in the titled patch?
I can send Andrew an updated series (reducing the c6x changes, and
possibly the score/unicore32 bits) later on.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-15 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-14 15:34 [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs Fengguang Wu
2012-08-14 16:22 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 2:30 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 2:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 13:42 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 14:12 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-08-15 14:19 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 5:42 ` guanxuetao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120815141233.GA32389@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a-jacquiot@ti.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.