From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>,
Kernel hackers <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ext4 hackers <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
maze@google.com
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:01:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120817060110.GA28786@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120816152513.GA31346@thunk.org>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:25:13AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:10:51PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >
> > Here is the dmesg. BTW, it seems 3.5.0 don't have this issue.
>
> Fengguang,
>
> It sounds like you have a (at least fairly) reliable reproduction for
> this problem? Is it something you can share? It would be good to get
Right, it can be easily reproduced here. I'm running these writeback
performance tests:
https://github.com/fengguang/writeback-tests
Which is basically doing N parallel dd writes to JBOD/RAID arrays on
various filesystems. It seems that the RAID test can reliably trigger
the problem.
> this into our test suites, since it was _not_ something that was
> caught by xfstests, apparently.
>
> Can you see if this patch addresses it? (The first two patch hunks
> are the same debugging additions I had posted before.)
>
> It looks like the responsible commit is 968dee7722: "ext4: fix hole
> punch failure when depth is greater than 0". I had thought this patch
> was low risk if you weren't using the new punch ioctl, but it turns
> out it did make a critical change in the non-punch (i.e., truncate)
> code path, which is what the addition of "i = 0;" in the patch below
> addresses.
Yes, I'm sure the patch fixed the bug. With the fix, the writeback
tests have run flawlessly for a dozen hours without any problem.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-15 18:33 NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Marti Raudsepp
2012-08-16 2:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 11:10 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-16 15:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 20:21 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-16 20:21 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-16 21:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 21:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 21:40 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-16 22:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 22:44 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-17 6:01 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-08-17 13:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 13:22 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 13:50 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix kernel BUG on large-scale rm -rf commands Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 17:48 ` NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-17 20:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 20:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 21:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-17 21:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-17 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-17 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-17 23:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 23:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 6:09 ` ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 13:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 14:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 14:25 ` ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5 Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20120817151318.GA2341@localhost>
2012-08-17 15:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 20:44 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-21 9:42 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-21 12:07 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20120822035702.GF2570@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
2012-08-22 4:07 ` Shaohua Li
2012-08-22 5:39 ` Yuanhan Liu
2012-08-22 6:00 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-22 6:31 ` Yuanhan Liu
2012-08-22 7:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-08-22 20:47 ` Dan Williams
2012-08-22 21:59 ` NeilBrown
2012-09-17 12:21 ` NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-17 13:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-17 14:48 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-08-16 9:00 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120817060110.GA28786@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marti@juffo.org \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.