All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>
Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Li Shaohua <shli@fusionio.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>,
	Kernel hackers <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ext4 hackers <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	maze@google.com, "Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@intel.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:59:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120823075945.4dd02cbd@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA9_cmc4t_P3p-72iZx4UALNe3fupVqBKvvsvCtMH6G3HZUdww@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1367 bytes --]

On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:47:07 -0700 Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:00 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:57:02 +0800 Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> -#define NR_STRIPES           256
> >> +#define NR_STRIPES           1024
> >
> > Changing one magic number into another magic number might help your case, but
> > it not really a general solution.
> >
> > Possibly making sure that max_nr_stripes is at least some multiple of the
> > chunk size might make sense, but I wouldn't want to see a very large multiple.
> >
> > I thing the problems with RAID5 are deeper than that.  Hopefully I'll figure
> > out exactly what the best fix is soon - I'm trying to look into it.
> >
> > I don't think the size of the cache is a big part of the solution.  I think
> > correct scheduling of IO is the real answer.
> 
> Not sure if this is what we are seeing here, but we still have the
> unresolved fast parity effect whereby slower parity calculation gives
> a larger time to coalesce writes.  I saw this effect when playing with
> xor offload.

I did find a case where inserting a printk made it go faster again.
Replacing that with msleep(2) worked as well. :-)

I'm looking for a most robust solution though.
Thanks for the reminder.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-22 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-15 18:33 NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Marti Raudsepp
2012-08-16  2:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 11:10   ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-16 15:25     ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 20:21       ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-16 20:21         ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-16 21:19         ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 21:19           ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 21:40           ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-16 22:26             ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 22:44               ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-17  6:01       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 13:15         ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 13:22           ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 13:50           ` [PATCH] ext4: fix kernel BUG on large-scale rm -rf commands Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 17:48           ` NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-17 20:34             ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 20:34               ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 21:05               ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-17 21:05                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-17 22:55                 ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-17 22:55                   ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-17 23:11                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 23:11                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17  6:09       ` ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 13:40         ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 14:13           ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 14:25           ` ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5 Fengguang Wu
     [not found]             ` <20120817151318.GA2341@localhost>
2012-08-17 15:37               ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 20:44             ` NeilBrown
2012-08-21  9:42               ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-21 12:07                 ` Fengguang Wu
     [not found]             ` <20120822035702.GF2570@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
2012-08-22  4:07               ` Shaohua Li
2012-08-22  5:39                 ` Yuanhan Liu
2012-08-22  6:00               ` NeilBrown
2012-08-22  6:31                 ` Yuanhan Liu
2012-08-22  7:14                 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-08-22 20:47                 ` Dan Williams
2012-08-22 21:59                   ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-09-17 12:21   ` NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-17 13:52     ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-17 14:48       ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-08-16  9:00 ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120823075945.4dd02cbd@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=djbw@fb.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marti@juffo.org \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=shli@fusionio.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.