From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mmu_notifier: fix inconsistent memory between secondary MMU and host
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:15:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120822121535.8be38858.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120822162955.GT29978@redhat.com>
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:29:55 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:03:41PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > On 08/21/2012 11:06 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > CPU0 CPU1
> > > oldpage[1] == 0 (both guest & host)
> > > oldpage[0] = 1
> > > trigger do_wp_page
> >
> > We always do ptep_clear_flush before set_pte_at_notify(),
> > at this point, we have done:
> > pte = 0 and flush all tlbs
> > > mmu_notifier_change_pte
> > > spte = newpage + writable
> > > guest does newpage[1] = 1
> > > vmexit
> > > host read oldpage[1] == 0
> >
> > It can not happen, at this point pte = 0, host can not
> > access oldpage anymore, host read can generate #PF, it
> > will be blocked on page table lock until CPU 0 release the lock.
>
> Agreed, this is why your fix is safe.
>
> ...
>
> Thanks a lot for fixing this subtle race!
I'll take that as an ack.
Unfortunately we weren't told the user-visible effects of the bug,
which often makes it hard to determine which kernel versions should be
patched. Please do always provide this information when fixing a bug.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mmu_notifier: fix inconsistent memory between secondary MMU and host
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:15:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120822121535.8be38858.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120822162955.GT29978@redhat.com>
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:29:55 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:03:41PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > On 08/21/2012 11:06 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > CPU0 CPU1
> > > oldpage[1] == 0 (both guest & host)
> > > oldpage[0] = 1
> > > trigger do_wp_page
> >
> > We always do ptep_clear_flush before set_pte_at_notify(),
> > at this point, we have done:
> > pte = 0 and flush all tlbs
> > > mmu_notifier_change_pte
> > > spte = newpage + writable
> > > guest does newpage[1] = 1
> > > vmexit
> > > host read oldpage[1] == 0
> >
> > It can not happen, at this point pte = 0, host can not
> > access oldpage anymore, host read can generate #PF, it
> > will be blocked on page table lock until CPU 0 release the lock.
>
> Agreed, this is why your fix is safe.
>
> ...
>
> Thanks a lot for fixing this subtle race!
I'll take that as an ack.
Unfortunately we weren't told the user-visible effects of the bug,
which often makes it hard to determine which kernel versions should be
patched. Please do always provide this information when fixing a bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 9:46 [PATCH] mm: mmu_notifier: fix inconsistent memory between secondary MMU and host Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-21 9:46 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-21 15:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-21 15:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-21 15:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-22 3:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-22 3:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-22 4:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-08-22 4:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-08-22 5:37 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-22 5:37 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-22 16:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-22 16:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-23 7:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-23 7:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-22 6:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-22 6:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-22 16:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-22 16:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-22 19:15 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-08-22 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-22 19:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-22 19:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-22 19:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-22 19:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-22 20:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-22 20:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2012-08-23 7:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-23 7:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120822121535.8be38858.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.