From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>
To: Stany MARCEL <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support to broadcom 5222 PHY
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:02:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120823160255.GA32671@frolo.macqel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+mBkFXnOB9hPoJVf6c92UuemqtLJwc2KW-G-ja6cG8VqLPZdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:21:23PM +0200, Stany MARCEL wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Stany MARCEL
> > <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com> wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel 2.6.25.
> >>
> >> Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m68k head
> >> 2 FEC configured with shared phy
> >>
> >> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 7 +-
> >> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/net/phy/broadcom522x.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > This patch and "[PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver" need to go
> > through the netdev tree, or collect acks there.
> >
> > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> >
> > Geert
> >
>
> Hello Geert,
>
> Please, what is the good process to follow as patch 3 depends on patch 1 ?
Actually, IMHO patch 3 does not depend on patch 1, and I even think that
patch 1 is not needed, except to get a message with "BCM5222" instead
of "Generic PHY" in the kernel log.
AFAIK the phy interface is standardized.
Philippe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>
To: Stany MARCEL <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support to broadcom 5222 PHY
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:02:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120823160255.GA32671@frolo.macqel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+mBkFXnOB9hPoJVf6c92UuemqtLJwc2KW-G-ja6cG8VqLPZdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:21:23PM +0200, Stany MARCEL wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Stany MARCEL
> > <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com> wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel 2.6.25.
> >>
> >> Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m68k head
> >> 2 FEC configured with shared phy
> >>
> >> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 7 +-
> >> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/net/phy/broadcom522x.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > This patch and "[PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver" need to go
> > through the netdev tree, or collect acks there.
> >
> > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> >
> > Geert
> >
>
> Hello Geert,
>
> Please, what is the good process to follow as patch 3 depends on patch 1 ?
Actually, IMHO patch 3 does not depend on patch 1, and I even think that
patch 1 is not needed, except to get a message with "BCM5222" instead
of "Generic PHY" in the kernel log.
AFAIK the phy interface is standardized.
Philippe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 12:18 [PATCH 1/3] Add support to broadcom 5222 PHY Stany MARCEL
2012-08-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add support to Freescale M54xx Multi Channel DMA engine Stany MARCEL
2012-08-21 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver Stany MARCEL
2012-08-21 12:18 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-08-28 5:51 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-08-28 5:51 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-05 9:14 ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-09-05 9:14 ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-09-05 10:48 ` RE : " Stany MARCEL
2012-09-05 10:48 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-09-05 11:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-05 11:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-05 13:50 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-05 22:48 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-08-23 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add support to broadcom 5222 PHY Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-08-23 12:34 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-08-23 12:34 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-08-23 15:25 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-08-23 15:25 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-08-23 15:21 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-08-23 15:21 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-08-23 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-08-23 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-08-23 16:02 ` Philippe De Muyter [this message]
2012-08-23 16:02 ` Philippe De Muyter
2012-08-23 22:01 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-08-23 22:01 ` Stany MARCEL
2012-08-23 10:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-21 12:18 Stany MARCEL
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120823160255.GA32671@frolo.macqel \
--to=phdm@macqel.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.