All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: mach-pnx4008: Remove architecture
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:41:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208260441.25905.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50378084.3080102@antcom.de>

On Friday 24 August 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 23/08/12 14:22, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > This patch removes the ARM architecture mach-pnx4008. No direct support or user
> > feedback since 2006. Acknowledgements from NXP/Philips and Linux arm-soc
> > maintainers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
> 
> The patch was a bit too big for the mailing list - sorry.
> 
> Now re-proposing via pull request, below.

I think the removal of the frame buffer driver should go separately via the
framebuffer maintainer (Florian Schandinat), I can take the rest through the
arm-soc tree.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Cc: "arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	aletes.xgr@gmail.com, kevin.wells@nxp.com,
	srinivas.bakki@nxp.com,
	Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mach-pnx4008: Remove architecture
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:41:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208260441.25905.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50378084.3080102@antcom.de>

On Friday 24 August 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 23/08/12 14:22, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > This patch removes the ARM architecture mach-pnx4008. No direct support or user
> > feedback since 2006. Acknowledgements from NXP/Philips and Linux arm-soc
> > maintainers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
> 
> The patch was a bit too big for the mailing list - sorry.
> 
> Now re-proposing via pull request, below.

I think the removal of the frame buffer driver should go separately via the
framebuffer maintainer (Florian Schandinat), I can take the rest through the
arm-soc tree.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-26  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-23 12:22 [PATCH] ARM: mach-pnx4008: Remove architecture Roland Stigge
2012-08-23 12:22 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-24 13:24 ` [GIT PULL] " Roland Stigge
2012-08-24 13:24   ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-26  4:41   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2012-08-26  4:41     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-26 14:34     ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-26 14:34       ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-05 23:18       ` Olof Johansson
2012-09-05 23:18         ` Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201208260441.25905.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.