From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] kernel.h: Introduce IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:20:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120828162016.GA29145@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120828180926.4d64f99a@endymion.delvare>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 06:09:26PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:53:17 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2) = 0
> >
> > Most of the time this does not matter. However, in the hardware monitoring
> > subsystem, it is often used on integers which can be negative (such as
> > temperatures). Introduce new macro IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST which also supports
> > negative dividends.
>
> Good catch. It's been broken for years and I never noticed :(
>
> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > ---
> > I can take this patch through my hwmon tree, but would like to get an Ack first.
> > Alternative would be to put it into include/linux/hwmon.h, but I would prefer
> > to avoid that.
>
> I agree it should sit next to DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST in <linux/kernel.h>.
>
> >
> > Also, if someone has an idea for a simpler implementation, I would really like
> > to know about it.
>
> I can't think of anything better.
>
> Note that your implementation only supports negative dividend not
> divisor. While it won't be a problem for hwmon drivers, and most
> probably not a problem for other drivers either, it might be worth
> putting in a comment so as to prevent false expectations from the
> reader.
>
I noticed. I am not concerned about negative divisors, though, but unsigned
divisor variables are a problem too. I have a new version which also supports
divisors which are declared as unsigned.
Thanks,
Guenter
> >
> > include/linux/kernel.h | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index 6043821..a89483c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -89,6 +89,15 @@
> > } \
> > )
> >
> > +#define IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, divisor)( \
> > +{ \
> > + typeof(x) __x = x; \
> > + typeof(divisor) __d1 = divisor; \
> > + typeof(divisor) __d2 = (__x) < 0 ? -(__d1) : (__d1);\
> > + (((__x) + ((__d2) / 2)) / (__d1)); \
> > +} \
> > +)
> > +
> > /*
> > * Multiplies an integer by a fraction, while avoiding unnecessary
> > * overflow or loss of precision.
>
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Introduce IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:20:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120828162016.GA29145@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120828180926.4d64f99a@endymion.delvare>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 06:09:26PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:53:17 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2) = 0
> >
> > Most of the time this does not matter. However, in the hardware monitoring
> > subsystem, it is often used on integers which can be negative (such as
> > temperatures). Introduce new macro IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST which also supports
> > negative dividends.
>
> Good catch. It's been broken for years and I never noticed :(
>
> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > ---
> > I can take this patch through my hwmon tree, but would like to get an Ack first.
> > Alternative would be to put it into include/linux/hwmon.h, but I would prefer
> > to avoid that.
>
> I agree it should sit next to DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST in <linux/kernel.h>.
>
> >
> > Also, if someone has an idea for a simpler implementation, I would really like
> > to know about it.
>
> I can't think of anything better.
>
> Note that your implementation only supports negative dividend not
> divisor. While it won't be a problem for hwmon drivers, and most
> probably not a problem for other drivers either, it might be worth
> putting in a comment so as to prevent false expectations from the
> reader.
>
I noticed. I am not concerned about negative divisors, though, but unsigned
divisor variables are a problem too. I have a new version which also supports
divisors which are declared as unsigned.
Thanks,
Guenter
> >
> > include/linux/kernel.h | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index 6043821..a89483c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -89,6 +89,15 @@
> > } \
> > )
> >
> > +#define IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, divisor)( \
> > +{ \
> > + typeof(x) __x = x; \
> > + typeof(divisor) __d1 = divisor; \
> > + typeof(divisor) __d2 = (__x) < 0 ? -(__d1) : (__d1);\
> > + (((__x) + ((__d2) / 2)) / (__d1)); \
> > +} \
> > +)
> > +
> > /*
> > * Multiplies an integer by a fraction, while avoiding unnecessary
> > * overflow or loss of precision.
>
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-28 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-25 0:53 [lm-sensors] [PATCH] kernel.h: Introduce IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST Guenter Roeck
2012-08-25 0:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-08-28 16:09 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2012-08-28 16:09 ` Jean Delvare
2012-08-28 16:20 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2012-08-28 16:20 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120828162016.GA29145@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.