From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc
<linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij-0IS4wlFg1OjSUeElwK9/Pw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:41:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208290941.32071.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503D4FB1.1020206-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2012, 01:09:37 schrieb Kukjin Kim:
> On 08/28/12 14:55, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Until now the Exynos-SoC was the only Samsung-SoC supporting the GPIOs
> > via the device tree. This patch implements dt-support for the
> > s3c24xx arches.
> >
> > The controllers contain only 3 cells, as the underlying gpio controller
> > does not support controlling the drive strength on a gpio level.
> >
> > Tested with the gpio-keys driver on a s3c2416 based machine.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner<heiko@sntech.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Abraham<thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>
> Yeah, looks good to me...
>
> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>
> BTW, I'm not sure when we can support device tree for S3C24XX :-)
As you might've guessed, I'm working on it :-) .
Thanks to some engineers of yours at least the s3c2416/s3c2450 SoCs share a
lot of components with all the newer ones and their drivers already contain
the dt bindings - mostly thanks to Thomas I think.
So the only real hard part I need to figure out for now is, how to implement
the interrupt bindings. Then I'll already have sdhci, rtc, watchdog, serial
and i2c available.
And if I also manage to get the dma into dt, I'll also have the s3c64xx-spi
available.
So, all in all, this does sound solvable :-)
Heiko
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
> > ---
> > changes since v1:
> > update bindings documentation to address SoC specific issues
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt | 43 +++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 63
> > ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 0
> > deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt index
> > 5375625..f1e5dfe 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
> >
> > @@ -39,3 +39,46 @@ Example:
> > #gpio-cells =<4>;
> > gpio-controller;
> >
> > };
> >
> > +
> > +
> > +Samsung S3C24XX GPIO Controller
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: Compatible property value should be
> > "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio". +
> > +- reg: Physical base address of the controller and length of memory
> > mapped + region.
> > +
> > +- #gpio-cells: Should be 3. The syntax of the gpio specifier used by
> > client nodes + should be the following with values derived from the SoC
> > user manual. +<[phandle of the gpio controller node]
> > + [pin number within the gpio controller]
> > + [mux function]
> > + [flags and pull up/down]
> > +
> > + Values for gpio specifier:
> > + - Pin number: depending on the controller a number from 0 up to 15.
> > + - Mux function: Depending on the SoC and the gpio bank the gpio can be
> > set + as input, output or a special function
> > + - Flags and Pull Up/Down: the values to use differ for the individual
> > SoCs + example S3C2416/S3C2450:
> > + 0 - Pull Up/Down Disabled.
> > + 1 - Pull Down Enabled.
> > + 2 - Pull Up Enabled.
> > + Bit 16 (0x00010000) - Input is active low.
> > + Consult the user manual for the correct values of Mux and Pull
> > Up/Down. +
> > +- gpio-controller: Specifies that the node is a gpio controller.
> > +- #address-cells: should be 1.
> > +- #size-cells: should be 1.
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > + gpa: gpio-controller@56000000 {
> > + #address-cells =<1>;
> > + #size-cells =<1>;
> > + compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio";
> > + reg =<0x56000000 0x10>;
> > + #gpio-cells =<3>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + };
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> > index ba126cc..54f6663 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> > @@ -938,6 +938,67 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct
> > samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
> >
> > s3c_gpiolib_track(chip);
> >
> > }
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX)&& defined(CONFIG_OF)
> > +static int s3c24xx_gpio_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > + const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int pin;
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON(gc->of_gpio_n_cells< 3))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON(gpiospec->args_count< gc->of_gpio_n_cells))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (gpiospec->args[0]> gc->ngpio)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + pin = gc->base + gpiospec->args[0];
> > +
> > + if (s3c_gpio_cfgpin(pin, S3C_GPIO_SFN(gpiospec->args[1])))
> > + pr_warn("gpio_xlate: failed to set pin function\n");
> > + if (s3c_gpio_setpull(pin, gpiospec->args[2]& 0xffff))
> > + pr_warn("gpio_xlate: failed to set pin pull up/down\n");
> > +
> > + if (flags)
> > + *flags = gpiospec->args[2]>> 16;
> > +
> > + return gpiospec->args[0];
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id s3c24xx_gpio_dt_match[] __initdata = {
> > + { .compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio", },
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +
> > +static __init void s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(struct
> > samsung_gpio_chip *chip, + u64 base, u64 offset)
> > +{
> > + struct gpio_chip *gc =&chip->chip;
> > + u64 address;
> > +
> > + if (!of_have_populated_dt())
> > + return;
> > +
> > + address = chip->base ? base + ((u32)chip->base& 0xfff) : base +
> > offset; + gc->of_node = of_find_matching_node_by_address(NULL,
> > + s3c24xx_gpio_dt_match, address);
> > + if (!gc->of_node) {
> > + pr_info("gpio: device tree node not found for gpio controller"
> > + " with base address %08llx\n", address);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + gc->of_gpio_n_cells = 3;
> > + gc->of_xlate = s3c24xx_gpio_xlate;
> > +}
> > +#elif defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX)
> > +static __init void s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(struct
> > samsung_gpio_chip *chip, + u64 base, u64 offset)
> > +{
> > + return;
> > +}
> > +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX)&& defined(CONFIG_OF) */
> > +
> >
> > static void __init s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips(struct samsung_gpio_chip
> > *chip,
> >
> > int nr_chips, void __iomem *base)
> >
> > {
> >
> > @@ -962,6 +1023,8 @@ static void __init s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips(struct
> > samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
> >
> > gc->direction_output = samsung_gpiolib_2bit_output;
> >
> > samsung_gpiolib_add(chip);
> >
> > +
> > + s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(chip, S3C24XX_PA_GPIO, i * 0x10);
> >
> > }
> >
> > }
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:41:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208290941.32071.heiko@sntech.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503D4FB1.1020206@samsung.com>
Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2012, 01:09:37 schrieb Kukjin Kim:
> On 08/28/12 14:55, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> > Until now the Exynos-SoC was the only Samsung-SoC supporting the GPIOs
> > via the device tree. This patch implements dt-support for the
> > s3c24xx arches.
> >
> > The controllers contain only 3 cells, as the underlying gpio controller
> > does not support controlling the drive strength on a gpio level.
> >
> > Tested with the gpio-keys driver on a s3c2416 based machine.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner<heiko@sntech.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Abraham<thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>
> Yeah, looks good to me...
>
> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>
> BTW, I'm not sure when we can support device tree for S3C24XX :-)
As you might've guessed, I'm working on it :-) .
Thanks to some engineers of yours at least the s3c2416/s3c2450 SoCs share a
lot of components with all the newer ones and their drivers already contain
the dt bindings - mostly thanks to Thomas I think.
So the only real hard part I need to figure out for now is, how to implement
the interrupt bindings. Then I'll already have sdhci, rtc, watchdog, serial
and i2c available.
And if I also manage to get the dma into dt, I'll also have the s3c64xx-spi
available.
So, all in all, this does sound solvable :-)
Heiko
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Kgene.
> --
> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>
> > ---
> > changes since v1:
> > update bindings documentation to address SoC specific issues
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt | 43 +++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 63
> > ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 0
> > deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt index
> > 5375625..f1e5dfe 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-samsung.txt
> >
> > @@ -39,3 +39,46 @@ Example:
> > #gpio-cells =<4>;
> > gpio-controller;
> >
> > };
> >
> > +
> > +
> > +Samsung S3C24XX GPIO Controller
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: Compatible property value should be
> > "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio". +
> > +- reg: Physical base address of the controller and length of memory
> > mapped + region.
> > +
> > +- #gpio-cells: Should be 3. The syntax of the gpio specifier used by
> > client nodes + should be the following with values derived from the SoC
> > user manual. +<[phandle of the gpio controller node]
> > + [pin number within the gpio controller]
> > + [mux function]
> > + [flags and pull up/down]
> > +
> > + Values for gpio specifier:
> > + - Pin number: depending on the controller a number from 0 up to 15.
> > + - Mux function: Depending on the SoC and the gpio bank the gpio can be
> > set + as input, output or a special function
> > + - Flags and Pull Up/Down: the values to use differ for the individual
> > SoCs + example S3C2416/S3C2450:
> > + 0 - Pull Up/Down Disabled.
> > + 1 - Pull Down Enabled.
> > + 2 - Pull Up Enabled.
> > + Bit 16 (0x00010000) - Input is active low.
> > + Consult the user manual for the correct values of Mux and Pull
> > Up/Down. +
> > +- gpio-controller: Specifies that the node is a gpio controller.
> > +- #address-cells: should be 1.
> > +- #size-cells: should be 1.
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > + gpa: gpio-controller at 56000000 {
> > + #address-cells =<1>;
> > + #size-cells =<1>;
> > + compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio";
> > + reg =<0x56000000 0x10>;
> > + #gpio-cells =<3>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + };
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> > index ba126cc..54f6663 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> > @@ -938,6 +938,67 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct
> > samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
> >
> > s3c_gpiolib_track(chip);
> >
> > }
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX)&& defined(CONFIG_OF)
> > +static int s3c24xx_gpio_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > + const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int pin;
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON(gc->of_gpio_n_cells< 3))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON(gpiospec->args_count< gc->of_gpio_n_cells))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (gpiospec->args[0]> gc->ngpio)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + pin = gc->base + gpiospec->args[0];
> > +
> > + if (s3c_gpio_cfgpin(pin, S3C_GPIO_SFN(gpiospec->args[1])))
> > + pr_warn("gpio_xlate: failed to set pin function\n");
> > + if (s3c_gpio_setpull(pin, gpiospec->args[2]& 0xffff))
> > + pr_warn("gpio_xlate: failed to set pin pull up/down\n");
> > +
> > + if (flags)
> > + *flags = gpiospec->args[2]>> 16;
> > +
> > + return gpiospec->args[0];
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id s3c24xx_gpio_dt_match[] __initdata = {
> > + { .compatible = "samsung,s3c24xx-gpio", },
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +
> > +static __init void s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(struct
> > samsung_gpio_chip *chip, + u64 base, u64 offset)
> > +{
> > + struct gpio_chip *gc =&chip->chip;
> > + u64 address;
> > +
> > + if (!of_have_populated_dt())
> > + return;
> > +
> > + address = chip->base ? base + ((u32)chip->base& 0xfff) : base +
> > offset; + gc->of_node = of_find_matching_node_by_address(NULL,
> > + s3c24xx_gpio_dt_match, address);
> > + if (!gc->of_node) {
> > + pr_info("gpio: device tree node not found for gpio controller"
> > + " with base address %08llx\n", address);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + gc->of_gpio_n_cells = 3;
> > + gc->of_xlate = s3c24xx_gpio_xlate;
> > +}
> > +#elif defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX)
> > +static __init void s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(struct
> > samsung_gpio_chip *chip, + u64 base, u64 offset)
> > +{
> > + return;
> > +}
> > +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX)&& defined(CONFIG_OF) */
> > +
> >
> > static void __init s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips(struct samsung_gpio_chip
> > *chip,
> >
> > int nr_chips, void __iomem *base)
> >
> > {
> >
> > @@ -962,6 +1023,8 @@ static void __init s3c24xx_gpiolib_add_chips(struct
> > samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
> >
> > gc->direction_output = samsung_gpiolib_2bit_output;
> >
> > samsung_gpiolib_add(chip);
> >
> > +
> > + s3c24xx_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(chip, S3C24XX_PA_GPIO, i * 0x10);
> >
> > }
> >
> > }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-29 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-28 21:55 [PATCH v2] gpio: samsung: add devicetree init for s3c24xx arches Heiko Stübner
2012-08-28 21:55 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-28 23:09 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-08-28 23:09 ` Kukjin Kim
[not found] ` <503D4FB1.1020206-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-29 7:41 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2012-08-29 7:41 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-08-31 23:07 ` Linus Walleij
2012-08-31 23:07 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-06 22:25 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-09-06 22:25 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-09-07 5:38 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-09-07 5:38 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-09-07 7:27 ` Heiko Stübner
2012-09-07 7:27 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201208290941.32071.heiko@sntech.de \
--to=heiko-4mtyjxux2i+zqb+pc5nmwq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linus.walleij-0IS4wlFg1OjSUeElwK9/Pw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.