All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Oliver <olipro@8.c.9.b.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] death_by_event() does not check IPS_DYING_BIT - race condition against ctnetlink_del_conntrack
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:34:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120830103437.GA13756@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5239380.eElFyXbOPg@gentoovm>

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:09:01AM +0200, Oliver wrote:
> On Thursday 30 August 2012 04:50:09 you wrote:
> > Not sure what you mean, you're still crashing with the patch below,
> > right?
> > 
> > My proposal is to give a try to the ecache patch, that requires
> > removing the previous patch.
> 
> Apologies for the confusion;  the patch quoted is essentially the first patch 
> you provided me, with my changes to make it work in 3.4.10 *plus* the deletion 
> of the change to nf_conntrack_ecache.h where your patch deleted the 
> nf_ct_is_dying() check (i.e I have this check left in) - with this 
> modification, I find that conntrackd is well-behaved and I have thus far not 
> successfully caused a kernel panic.
> 
> Having tested your latest patch, I can also confirm that it also does not 
> crash, including at exhaustion of the conntrack table.
>
> In terms of overall stability, I would presume your latest patch is superior 
> to the previous (i.e. what I attached most recently) ?

Yes, I prefer the second patch. There is still races in the first
patch I sent you, harder to trigger, but still there.

There are several cleanups I'd like to recover from the first patch
though. Would you help testing them?

Thanks a lot for testing.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-30 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-27  9:33 [PATCH] death_by_event() does not check IPS_DYING_BIT - race condition against ctnetlink_del_conntrack Oliver
2012-08-28 10:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-28 17:16   ` Oliver
2012-08-28 23:10     ` Oliver
2012-08-30  0:52       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-30  2:05         ` Oliver
2012-08-30  2:25           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
     [not found] ` <5427975.6moJlq4F9d@gentoovm>
     [not found]   ` <20120830025009.GA16782@1984>
2012-08-30  3:09     ` Oliver
2012-08-30 10:34       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2012-08-30 12:28         ` Oliver
2012-08-30 12:39           ` Oliver
2012-08-30 16:22           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-30 17:49             ` Oliver
2012-08-30 18:39               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-31  0:19                 ` Oliver
2012-08-31  9:27                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120830103437.GA13756@1984 \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olipro@8.c.9.b.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.