From: Oliver <olipro@8.c.9.b.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] death_by_event() does not check IPS_DYING_BIT - race condition against ctnetlink_del_conntrack
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 02:19:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2118331.Ka640JXjym@gentoovm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120830183950.GB13190@1984>
On Thursday 30 August 2012 20:39:50 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Interesting, how are those assumptions fulfilled?
Well, timing of course ;) - essentially, traffic paths are ensured longer than
the actual time for replication of conntrack state.
> Agreed. But I don't come with any netfilter change that may result in
> that problem you're reporting. You'll have to debug this and get back
> to me with more information.
You can disregard this, turned out to be due to the unfortunate fact that
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_tcp_be_liberal is of course replaced by
net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_tcp_be_liberal under 3.4
Please feel free to send me your latest rework of the patch and I will be
happy to test it out.
Kind Regards,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-31 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-27 9:33 [PATCH] death_by_event() does not check IPS_DYING_BIT - race condition against ctnetlink_del_conntrack Oliver
2012-08-28 10:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-28 17:16 ` Oliver
2012-08-28 23:10 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 0:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-30 2:05 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 2:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
[not found] ` <5427975.6moJlq4F9d@gentoovm>
[not found] ` <20120830025009.GA16782@1984>
2012-08-30 3:09 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 10:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-30 12:28 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 12:39 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 16:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-30 17:49 ` Oliver
2012-08-30 18:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-08-31 0:19 ` Oliver [this message]
2012-08-31 9:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2118331.Ka640JXjym@gentoovm \
--to=olipro@8.c.9.b.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.